To shut up all the conspiracy theorists

I have a feeling Oliver Stone is going to make a movie about this in 15 years, starring Kevin Costner

For all the geniuses that think they disposed of the body quickly as a means to cover up whether he is dead or not...it is because Muslim religion calls for a body to be "taken care of" within 24 hours.

On another note, not getting to see the pictures is the most f'ed up thing of it all.

really? so why did we leave 3 muslims there to rot?  we've killed thousands of muslims since 9-11 how many of them did we bury "within 24 hrs"?

binladin   has been dead for 8 to10 years wake up pepole  go on prison planet .com  americans are be lied to all the time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude shut the hell up you just sound dumb trying to repeat the bullshit they told you say on the news. It was fake and most people know it. Id say between 65 and 75% of people know this is bullshit.

All you conspiracy nuts....just give me a more logical explanation of what DID happen.  I don't care about the details, I just think he was killed on Sunday.  Tell me why you think different and back it up. 

And why would GW go on the record praising the fact that they finally got him?  Yeah, I'm sure it's a sneaky way to help the Republicans win the next election. 

Even Fox News hasn't reported that the story that Bin Laden is dead is BS. 

65-70%

Show me an article that supports this. 

I have no way to back that up and you know it. Everyone I know doesnt believe it. Most of the people that ive heard call into talk radio dont believe it. Most of the comment sections of all the mainstream news sites are filled with people who dont beieve it. Thats reality. Can you prove to me he was killed a few days ago? No.

i don't doubt hes dead (well maybe a little) and i don't doubt we stormed his compound, the problem is NOBODY knows what happened (except for the S.E.A.L.S and their targets and neither of them are going to tell us) not even the group we see in the now famous "situation room" photo their version of the events change with every click of the clock, all we are doing is discussing the "facts" the put forward, the problem with that is by the time i'm done typing this, those "facts" will change again, a cover-up is described as omitting, altering or denying the facts or evidence, if they had nothing to hide they would have no reason to omit alter or deny ANY part of what happened sunday, they did so we speculate as to why

Just give me a more LOGICAL alternative explanation that makes sense from the US and Al Quaida perspective. 

Is he alive?  And if so, who does that benefit based on what has happened?  Was he already dead?  If so, who benefited from keeping that secret?  And if it was a secret, why wouldn't Al Quaida tell the true story and prevent the US from all the credit?

You don't have any alternative explanations that make any sense.  All you have is a distrust of the government.  That's not evidence to me.

how about all you puppets that keep bashing the 'consipracy nuts' here, you answer these questions instead of vise versa..stop telling us to answer you answer us first

1. in the aftermatch of the wtc collapse,  why was there thermite found at ground zero leading to volunteer workers dying from being poisoned to death? was it being fed to the passengers in their airplane food?

2. why do engineers and scholars of the world who are smarter than your dumbasses claim that it is scientifically and physically impossible for a plane to cause a massive steel structured building to collapse at rocket speed?

3.  why the hell did building 7 collapse, it wasn't touched by any airplane?

4. why did the debris of the fallens wtc towers turn into dust when in science logic, there should have been a mountain formed of glass and steel...how did all that material turn into dust?

5. why did dickhead cheney claim bin laden had nothing to do with 911?

6. why did your brilliant and beloved president not react when he was in the classroom reading to kids, told that a wtc building was flown into by a plane? he just sat there like he passed gas and hoped nobody would know about it... i want to hear this one

7. why is the white house all of a sudden respecting and honoring the "worlds worst scum alive"?

8. why did rumsfeld encourage the torturing of prisoners at quantanamo bay? god bless your america indeed

9. how can nasa spot a skid mark on your underwear from space but can't find bin laden in a decades time?

fuk it i'm tired just answer these questions 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjtNiTm99e8 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1TsCZUbGfY 

This is to big a story for me to type. So Im going to direct you someone more credable of me. These two interviews from the past two days totalling 3 hours break it all down from the perspective of Steve pieczenik the real life Jack Ryan. A career top government man who demands respect and at least must be heard out.

Heres his bio.

https://www.stevepieczenik.com/bio.htm 

This guy will show you everything you need to know about the other side of the story in these interviews. If you not willing to hear him out then your just blowing smoke and just want to argue for the sake of arguing.

how long befor they (the govmt.) say "what we thought was osama bin laden turned out to be nothing more than a weather balloon?

And you actually get to vote. 

I'm offering 2:1 if someone wants to put their money where their mouth is.  And I will raise my bet to $5K.  Funny how all I heard was crickets after I asked someone if they wanted to lay some cash on the line. 

Spare me the hour and a half of boredom and tell me briefly how the US and/or Al Quaida would benefit from an alternative explanation of what happened.  It's a pretty simple question. 

Guys quit talking to hutch hes just blowing smoke. He wont even hear out the other side from a man whos still works with the Department of Defense.

I explained to you why I believe Bin Laden was killed in that raid in one short paragraph.  You send me an FN video that is an hour and a half long. 

Summarize it for me using logic.  I actually work for a living. 

actually, you didnt get crickets, you got exposed as an ass, you're proposition is assinine the only way you could determine a winner would be to get the unedited version of events start to finish from the helmet cameras from the S.E.A.L.S, and i doubt you have that kinda juice, you asked for "logical alternatives" to the events of sunday, well your puppet masters in the white house give you one every hour, take your pick, if what they said happened on monday morning was true, accurate and "LOGICAL" why do they keep changing it? now YOU give me a "logical" reason for that question....."IT'S A PRETTY SIMPLE ONE"

There are 2 sides to every argument........

1]  Hutches opinion. 

2]  Any other opinion and you are an idiot.  

 

Bowman....Good luck on getting him to answer your questions. He's never answered mine about the pentagon or building 7....And I only asked 2 or 3. 

Another selective reader.  I already said that they very possibly fudged the details.  My contention is that they killed Bin Laden in that raid.  That's it.  The White House has never waivered in that regard. 

And yet another person who can't provide a logical alternative.....just changes the subject to the fact that the White House can't get their story straight re. the details....which I said was probably going to be the case anyway.  

if what they said happened on monday morning was true, accurate and "LOGICAL" why do they keep changing it?

___________

They have changed the details.....not the fact that they killed Bin Laden in that raid.  Moron.