Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
1.) Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, is seen in this video claiming that Flight 93 had been shot down by someone on 9/11/2001. This completely contradicts the official story of our Government, which was that hijackers took over the plane in an attempt to fly it into the White House in Washington D.C., but their plan was foiled due to a group of passengers over-taking the hijackers and instead crash landing the plane in Shanksville, PA.
Why would Donald Rumsfeld claim that Flight 93 was shot down when in fact, "we know" that it crash landed in Shanksville?
2.) NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity". They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".
How can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason. They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.
NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):
"The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."
So essentially: Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite. NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.
Hmm. "Security detection". Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we Eric?
Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001.
Dulles just so happened to be the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it hit the Pentagon after being hijacked en route to San Francisco.
3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.
Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation? According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms. So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.
Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right smiddyo?
ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months. It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.
We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.
Now, I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?
Before you come back and start saying the ignorant rhetoric like last time, please take a moment to respond to my previous post, quoted above, and shed some light on us "oh so degenerate" conspiracy theorists, will you please?
Hot Forum Topics
