• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | General Discussion

    September 11, 2001 (long read)

    «First Previous 343536 ... 616263 Next Last»
    smdio
    tillyo
    HutchEmAll
    coldsnap55
    nuggins
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 50324
    Posts: 1555
    «First Previous 343536 ... 616263 Next Last»
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 3:53 PM ET #826

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:

    Eric Pizzella

    You've been talking quite a bit in this thread, while giving absolutely nothing but insults and childish bashing (while using improper grammar and sounding like a 5th grade student if anyone were to read your sentences out loud). I'm about to make you look rather foolish, I think

    I'm going to ask you a series of questions, maybe 2-3 as I don't want to overwhelm you.  If you would, please answer those questions for me to the best of your ability.  When you've done that (and try to make the arguements pertinent to the discussion, please), you can then ask me any series of questions you would like, regarding anything you would like.  This is called a debate. I'm sure you are unaware of this type of formal atmosphere, but I'm going to do my best to sink down to your intelligence level.  Here goes:

    1.)  Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, is seen in this video claiming that Flight 93 had been shot down by someone on 9/11/2001.  This completely contradicts the official story of our Government, which was that hijackers took over the plane in an attempt to fly it into the White House in Washington D.C., but their plan was foiled due to a group of passengers over-taking the hijackers and instead crash landing the plane in Shanksville, PA.

    Why would Donald Rumsfeld claim that Flight 93 was shot down when in fact, "we know" that it crash landed in Shanksville? 

     

    2.)  NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity".  They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".

    I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason.  They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.

    NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):

    "The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."

    So essentially:  Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite. NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.

    Hmm.  "Security detection".  Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we Eric?

    Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001. 

    Dulles just so happened to be the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it hit the Pentagon after being hijacked en route to San Francisco.

    3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.

    Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation?  According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms.  So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.

    Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right smiddyo?

    ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months.  It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.

    We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.

    Now, I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?


    Hutch

    Are you trying to avoid answering the above questions?  I'm not going to stop asking them until you answer me.  

    Are you purposely ignoring me?  I've given an answer to every single one of your questions and/or links that you posted, but you've not given me the same luxury.  

    Can you please dive into the above contradictions and tell me your stance on each?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:

    Eric Pizzella

    You've been talking quite a bit in this thread, while giving absolutely nothing but insults and childish bashing (while using improper grammar and sounding like a 5th grade student if anyone were to read your sentences out loud). I'm about to make you look rather foolish, I think

    I'm going to ask you a series of questions, maybe 2-3 as I don't want to overwhelm you.  If you would, please answer those questions for me to the best of your ability.  When you've done that (and try to make the arguements pertinent to the discussion, please), you can then ask me any series of questions you would like, regarding anything you would like.  This is called a debate. I'm sure you are unaware of this type of formal atmosphere, but I'm going to do my best to sink down to your intelligence level.  Here goes:

    1.)  Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, is seen in this video claiming that Flight 93 had been shot down by someone on 9/11/2001.  This completely contradicts the official story of our Government, which was that hijackers took over the plane in an attempt to fly it into the White House in Washington D.C., but their plan was foiled due to a group of passengers over-taking the hijackers and instead crash landing the plane in Shanksville, PA.

    Why would Donald Rumsfeld claim that Flight 93 was shot down when in fact, "we know" that it crash landed in Shanksville? 

     

    2.)  NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity".  They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".

    I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason.  They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.

    NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):

    "The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."

    So essentially:  Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite. NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.

    Hmm.  "Security detection".  Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we Eric?

    Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001. 

    Dulles just so happened to be the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it hit the Pentagon after being hijacked en route to San Francisco.

    3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.

    Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation?  According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms.  So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.

    Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right smiddyo?

    ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months.  It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.

    We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.

    Now, I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?


    Hutch

    Are you trying to avoid answering the above questions?  I'm not going to stop asking them until you answer me.  

    Are you purposely ignoring me?  I've given an answer to every single one of your questions and/or links that you posted, but you've not given me the same luxury.  

    Can you please dive into the above contradictions and tell me your stance on each?
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:03 PM ET #827

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    A cruise missle

    In this video, shot from the Double Tree hotel across the highway from the Pentagon, it shows a low flying object come into the screen, then the explosion, then the low flying object exits the screen on the right.  Follow the "pointer finger" to track the low flying object.

    To me, this is the clearest video that the government released that shows NO PLANE hit the Pentagon.  It has yet to be explained what this "low flying object" could be.

    I believe it's a fighter jet, flying extremely low to avoid radar detection, firing a cruise missile into the Pentagon and then flying away, unnoticed, as people focus in on the explosion. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    A cruise missle

    In this video, shot from the Double Tree hotel across the highway from the Pentagon, it shows a low flying object come into the screen, then the explosion, then the low flying object exits the screen on the right.  Follow the "pointer finger" to track the low flying object.

    To me, this is the clearest video that the government released that shows NO PLANE hit the Pentagon.  It has yet to be explained what this "low flying object" could be.

    I believe it's a fighter jet, flying extremely low to avoid radar detection, firing a cruise missile into the Pentagon and then flying away, unnoticed, as people focus in on the explosion. 
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:11 PM ET #828

    Furthermore, does this look like the nose of a 757 Boeing aircraft to you, or the nose of a cruise missile ?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Furthermore, does this look like the nose of a 757 Boeing aircraft to you, or the nose of a cruise missile ?
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:12 PM ET #829

    IF A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON, WHY WON'T THEY JUST SHOW US A VIDEO ?!?!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    IF A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON, WHY WON'T THEY JUST SHOW US A VIDEO ?!?!
     
    tillyo
    tillyo
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2010
    Posts: 154
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:34 PM ET #830

    So the terrorist cant use it to further their attacks on us.  Also their is the national secrity reason moron. That was easy!!!!!!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So the terrorist cant use it to further their attacks on us.  Also their is the national secrity reason moron. That was easy!!!!!!!!
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:39 PM ET #831

    The terrorists would be able to use a video to better attack us??? 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    The terrorists would be able to use a video to better attack us??? 
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:47 PM ET #832

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    A cruise missle

    Then explain all of the eyewitness accounts who said it was a plane.  Tell me how this "missile" took out the lamp posts.  Tell me why there were 757 airplane parts ALL over the crash site.  Tell me how they identified all but a couple of the bodies.

    I know.  The emergency responders were in on it.  So was the coroner....and all the medical personnel....and all of the eyewitnesses including a priest AND another pilot.  How come they all tell basically the same story?  How come many of them say the speed was increasing as the plane came toward the building?

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    A cruise missle

    Then explain all of the eyewitness accounts who said it was a plane.  Tell me how this "missile" took out the lamp posts.  Tell me why there were 757 airplane parts ALL over the crash site.  Tell me how they identified all but a couple of the bodies.

    I know.  The emergency responders were in on it.  So was the coroner....and all the medical personnel....and all of the eyewitnesses including a priest AND another pilot.  How come they all tell basically the same story?  How come many of them say the speed was increasing as the plane came toward the building?

     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:49 PM ET #833

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Then explain all of the eyewitness accounts who said it was a plane.  Tell me how this "missile" took out the lamp posts.  Tell me why there were 757 airplane parts ALL over the crash site.  Tell me how they identified all but a couple of the bodies.

    I know.  The emergency responders were in on it.  So was the coroner....and all the medical personnel....and all of the eyewitnesses including a priest AND another pilot.  How come they all tell basically the same story?  How come many of them say the speed was increasing as the plane came toward the building?


    I'm actually not going to answer a single question of yours until you start answering MY questions.  

    Look above.  There's a big long post I quoted from 3 pages ago that you've been ignoring.  Answer and/or respond to my claims, and then we'll continue to debate.  Until then, you're proving that you are nothing but afraid of the truth Hutch
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Then explain all of the eyewitness accounts who said it was a plane.  Tell me how this "missile" took out the lamp posts.  Tell me why there were 757 airplane parts ALL over the crash site.  Tell me how they identified all but a couple of the bodies.

    I know.  The emergency responders were in on it.  So was the coroner....and all the medical personnel....and all of the eyewitnesses including a priest AND another pilot.  How come they all tell basically the same story?  How come many of them say the speed was increasing as the plane came toward the building?


    I'm actually not going to answer a single question of yours until you start answering MY questions.  

    Look above.  There's a big long post I quoted from 3 pages ago that you've been ignoring.  Answer and/or respond to my claims, and then we'll continue to debate.  Until then, you're proving that you are nothing but afraid of the truth Hutch
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:53 PM ET #834

    I'm going to ask you a series of questions, maybe 2-3 as I don't want to overwhelm you.  If you would, please answer those questions for me to the best of your ability.  When you've done that (and try to make the arguements pertinent to the discussion, please), you can then ask me any series of questions you would like, regarding anything you would like.  This is called a debate. I'm sure you are unaware of this type of formal atmosphere, but I'm going to do my best to sink down to your intelligence level.  Here goes:

    1.)  Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, is seen in this video claiming that Flight 93 had been shot down by someone on 9/11/2001.  This completely contradicts the official story of our Government, which was that hijackers took over the plane in an attempt to fly it into the White House in Washington D.C., but their plan was foiled due to a group of passengers over-taking the hijackers and instead crash landing the plane in Shanksville, PA.

    Why would Donald Rumsfeld claim that Flight 93 was shot down when in fact, "we know" that it crash landed in Shanksville? 

     

    2.)  NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity".  They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".

    I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason.  They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.

    NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):

    "The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."

    So essentially:  Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite. NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.

    Hmm.  "Security detection".  Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we Eric?

    Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001. 

    Dulles just so happened to be the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it hit the Pentagon after being hijacked en route to San Francisco.

    3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.

    Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation?  According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms.  So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.

    Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right smiddyo?

    ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months.  It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.

    We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.

    Now, I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    _________

    Have you heard that dipshit Rumsfeld talk before?  He's a bumbling idiot.  So he misspoke. 

    The thermite argument has been shown to be COMPLETE bullshit.  The main guy proposing that argument was basically told to by his employer (and all his collegues) that he was full of shit.    He was even suspended because of his incompetence.

    I have also shown you that WTC 1 and 2 did NOT free fall.  You're making this up. 

    Yeah, they hit the pentagon with a cruise missile and quickly planted the mangled bodies of a bunch of people as well as the wreckage from a 757 jet liner.

    You crack me up. 

     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    I'm going to ask you a series of questions, maybe 2-3 as I don't want to overwhelm you.  If you would, please answer those questions for me to the best of your ability.  When you've done that (and try to make the arguements pertinent to the discussion, please), you can then ask me any series of questions you would like, regarding anything you would like.  This is called a debate. I'm sure you are unaware of this type of formal atmosphere, but I'm going to do my best to sink down to your intelligence level.  Here goes:

    1.)  Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defense of the United States of America, is seen in this video claiming that Flight 93 had been shot down by someone on 9/11/2001.  This completely contradicts the official story of our Government, which was that hijackers took over the plane in an attempt to fly it into the White House in Washington D.C., but their plan was foiled due to a group of passengers over-taking the hijackers and instead crash landing the plane in Shanksville, PA.

    Why would Donald Rumsfeld claim that Flight 93 was shot down when in fact, "we know" that it crash landed in Shanksville? 

     

    2.)  NIST, the Government-assigned agency to investigate the events of 9/11/2001 pertaining to the WTC complex in New York, released a revised report in 2008 which contained a few sections relating to the collapse of WTC7. According to the report that I just linked you to, NIST, who recorded an operating budget of $992 Million in 2009 and employs 2900 scientists, structural engineers, and technicians, claims that WTC7 collapsed upon itself in just over 5 seconds, with 2.25 second of that time "accelerating at the rate of gravity".  They further claim that "Freefall speed stopped as a result of the building collapsing on itself".

    I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    Before you answer, you should know that FEMA initally did an investigation as to why WTC7 collapsed, but could not determine a reason.  They did however note the presense of the military-grade chemical Nano-Thermite in the rubble of the WTC complex.

    NIST immediately dismissed the potential of Thermite to be used, stating (this is always gives me a laugh, btw):

    "The use of thermite instead of explosives is discarded by NIST on the basis that it is unlikely the necessary 100 pounds of thermate for each steel column could have been planted without being discovered."

    So essentially:  Thermite is found in the rubble of WTC7. Upon further investigation of the Thermite by FEMA, they determine that it is a military-grade form of the chemical, called Nano-Thermite. NIST quickly discredits FEMA's findings as false, claiming that it would be "impossible" to get the 20+ tons of thermite into the WTC complex without security detection.

    Hmm.  "Security detection".  Lets take a quick look at the Security of the WTC complex on 9/11/2001, shall we Eric?

    Stratesec, also known as Securacom, was responsible for the security of the entire WTC complex, as well as Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines on the morning of 9/11/2001. 

    Dulles just so happened to be the same airport that Flight 77 took off from, before it hit the Pentagon after being hijacked en route to San Francisco.

    3 United Airlines aircraft were used on the morning of 9/11 to execute the hijackings.

    Who exactly was in control of this entire "Securacom" operation?  According to the Wikipedia link that I just sent you to, this agency was pretty much run by a single person, instead of "delegated authority" as are many other security forms.  So then, who was the person in charge of everything-Securacom on 9/11/2001? Marvin P. Bush.

    Well, surely, you'll say, even if security might have been comprimised on 9/11 at the WTC complex, the "bad guys" still would have needed plenty of time to get the 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the buildings.... Right smiddyo?

    ACE Elevator "WTC modernization project", dated 3/1/2001 and lasted nearly 5 months.  It was finished roughly 10 days before the events of 9/11/2001.

    We now have a breach of security (Securacom), a false-flag elevator moderization (ACE), and a way to get 20+ tons of Nano-Thermite into the WTC complex over a 5+ month period before the events of 9/11/2001.

    Now, I have to ask you Eric, how can a building made of sevreal thousand tons of steel and reinforced concrete suddenly collapse at the rate of gravity upon itself without the aid of some sort of explosive device?

    _________

    Have you heard that dipshit Rumsfeld talk before?  He's a bumbling idiot.  So he misspoke. 

    The thermite argument has been shown to be COMPLETE bullshit.  The main guy proposing that argument was basically told to by his employer (and all his collegues) that he was full of shit.    He was even suspended because of his incompetence.

    I have also shown you that WTC 1 and 2 did NOT free fall.  You're making this up. 

    Yeah, they hit the pentagon with a cruise missile and quickly planted the mangled bodies of a bunch of people as well as the wreckage from a 757 jet liner.

    You crack me up. 

     

     
    coldsnap55
    coldsnap55
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 9818
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 4:54 PM ET #835

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    I'm actually not going to answer a single question of yours until you start answering MY questions.  

    Look above.  There's a big long post I quoted from 3 pages ago that you've been ignoring.  Answer and/or respond to my claims, and then we'll continue to debate.  Until then, you're proving that you are nothing but afraid of the truth Hutch

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:


    I'm actually not going to answer a single question of yours until you start answering MY questions.  

    Look above.  There's a big long post I quoted from 3 pages ago that you've been ignoring.  Answer and/or respond to my claims, and then we'll continue to debate.  Until then, you're proving that you are nothing but afraid of the truth Hutch

     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:04 PM ET #836

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Have you heard that dipshit Rumsfeld talk before?  He's a bumbling idiot.  So he misspoke. 

    The thermite argument has been shown to be COMPLETE bullshit.  The main guy proposing that argument was basically told to by his employer (and all his collegues) that he was full of shit.    He was even suspended because of his incompetence.

    I have also shown you that WTC 1 and 2 did NOT free fall.  You're making this up. 

    Yeah, they hit the pentagon with a cruise missile and quickly planted the mangled bodies of a bunch of people as well as the wreckage from a 757 jet liner.

    You crack me up. 

     


    He misspoke?  You're kidding me..  That's your response?

    How is the thermite argument bullshit?  FEMA found thermite at in the rubble, and later concluded that it was Nano-thermite.  I don't even know who you're referring to with this "main guy was fired yada yada".  I'm quoting FEMA, who are you quoting?

    And I did not say WTC1 or WTC2, I was referring to WTC7 that NIST admitted fell in free-fall speed.  Why are you avoiding my question?

    Please re-read my post.  And read it ALL, not just skim through and half-read things.  


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Have you heard that dipshit Rumsfeld talk before?  He's a bumbling idiot.  So he misspoke. 

    The thermite argument has been shown to be COMPLETE bullshit.  The main guy proposing that argument was basically told to by his employer (and all his collegues) that he was full of shit.    He was even suspended because of his incompetence.

    I have also shown you that WTC 1 and 2 did NOT free fall.  You're making this up. 

    Yeah, they hit the pentagon with a cruise missile and quickly planted the mangled bodies of a bunch of people as well as the wreckage from a 757 jet liner.

    You crack me up. 

     


    He misspoke?  You're kidding me..  That's your response?

    How is the thermite argument bullshit?  FEMA found thermite at in the rubble, and later concluded that it was Nano-thermite.  I don't even know who you're referring to with this "main guy was fired yada yada".  I'm quoting FEMA, who are you quoting?

    And I did not say WTC1 or WTC2, I was referring to WTC7 that NIST admitted fell in free-fall speed.  Why are you avoiding my question?

    Please re-read my post.  And read it ALL, not just skim through and half-read things.  


     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:10 PM ET #837

    Also, why haven't you commented on the ACE elevator project and Securacom/Stratesec?

    I love how you only respond to the parts of the argument that you WANT to respond to.  That's not how a debate works.  If we were being graded, you would have received a overwhelming "F" for your performance so far.  You're addressing absolutely NONE of my arguments and instead calling me an "idiot" to satisfy your own concerns, stemmed because you have NO ANSWERS to my claims.

    1.)  NIST said WTC7 fell at free-fall speed

    2.)  Rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down

    3.)  FEMA found Nano-Thermite in the WTC7 wreckage

    4.)  Out of 158 cameras that keep 24/7 surveillance of the Pentagon, 80 of them would have had a clear shot of Flight 77 striking the building.  The Government released 4 of the 80 tapes and NONE of the 4 show a Boeing 757 striking the building.  Instead, an argument can be made that an Exodus 2006 Cruise Missile can be seen in the video I quoted above striking the lawn of the Pentagon, and later the building.

    Please refute ?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Also, why haven't you commented on the ACE elevator project and Securacom/Stratesec?

    I love how you only respond to the parts of the argument that you WANT to respond to.  That's not how a debate works.  If we were being graded, you would have received a overwhelming "F" for your performance so far.  You're addressing absolutely NONE of my arguments and instead calling me an "idiot" to satisfy your own concerns, stemmed because you have NO ANSWERS to my claims.

    1.)  NIST said WTC7 fell at free-fall speed

    2.)  Rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down

    3.)  FEMA found Nano-Thermite in the WTC7 wreckage

    4.)  Out of 158 cameras that keep 24/7 surveillance of the Pentagon, 80 of them would have had a clear shot of Flight 77 striking the building.  The Government released 4 of the 80 tapes and NONE of the 4 show a Boeing 757 striking the building.  Instead, an argument can be made that an Exodus 2006 Cruise Missile can be seen in the video I quoted above striking the lawn of the Pentagon, and later the building.

    Please refute ?
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:13 PM ET #838

    Arthur Rosati, another security officer and an army reservist : You could smell the jet fuel, it was unbearable"

    LTC Brian Birdwell. He was just heading back down the hall to his office when the building exploded in front of him. He was transferred to George Washington Hospital, where [he was treated by] the best, cutting edge burn doctor in the U.S. The doctor told him that had he not gone to Georgetown first, he probably would not have survived because of the jet fuel in his lungs.

    According to Matt Hahr, Kirlin's senior project manager at the Pentagon, the employee "was thrown about 80 ft down the hall through the air. As he was traveling through the air, he says the ceiling was coming down from the concussion. He got thrown into a closet, the door slammed shut and the fireball went past him," recounts Hahr. "Jet fuel was on him and it irritated his eyes, but he didn't get burned.

    Jarvis Will
    From time spent on military aircraft, Will Jarvis knows what aviation fuel smells like. That smell was his only clue that a plane had crashed into the Pentagon, where he works as an operations research analyst for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

    Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (R-Ill.), a Naval Reserve intelligence officer. The first thing you smell is the burning. And then you can smell the aviation fuel. And then you can smell this sickly, rotten-meat smell, he said.

    ___________

    All mention jet fuel.  Missiles do NOT run on jet fuel, you moron.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Arthur Rosati, another security officer and an army reservist : You could smell the jet fuel, it was unbearable"

    LTC Brian Birdwell. He was just heading back down the hall to his office when the building exploded in front of him. He was transferred to George Washington Hospital, where [he was treated by] the best, cutting edge burn doctor in the U.S. The doctor told him that had he not gone to Georgetown first, he probably would not have survived because of the jet fuel in his lungs.

    According to Matt Hahr, Kirlin's senior project manager at the Pentagon, the employee "was thrown about 80 ft down the hall through the air. As he was traveling through the air, he says the ceiling was coming down from the concussion. He got thrown into a closet, the door slammed shut and the fireball went past him," recounts Hahr. "Jet fuel was on him and it irritated his eyes, but he didn't get burned.

    Jarvis Will
    From time spent on military aircraft, Will Jarvis knows what aviation fuel smells like. That smell was his only clue that a plane had crashed into the Pentagon, where he works as an operations research analyst for the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

    Rep. Mark Steven Kirk (R-Ill.), a Naval Reserve intelligence officer. The first thing you smell is the burning. And then you can smell the aviation fuel. And then you can smell this sickly, rotten-meat smell, he said.

    ___________

    All mention jet fuel.  Missiles do NOT run on jet fuel, you moron.

     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:14 PM ET #839

    Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:

    You're not even worth my time.  

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by coldsnap55:

    You're not even worth my time.  

     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:21 PM ET #840

    1.)  NIST said WTC7 fell at free-fall speed
     
    For PART of its collapse.  Once again, selective fact reporting by you. 

    2.)  Rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down
     
    So you've never heard this jackass mis-speak before?  Maybe he meant to say it went down and he screwed it up. 

    3.)  FEMA found Nano-Thermite in the WTC7 wreckage
     
    Thermite example already proven to be bullshit...I'm not going through that all again.  Even the guy you posted as proof of your argument was shown to be a fraud....by his employer and his colleagues.  Why do you believe that jackass, no one else does.
    4.)  Out of 158 cameras that keep 24/7 surveillance of the Pentagon, 80 of them would have had a clear shot of Flight 77 striking the building.  The Government released 4 of the 80 tapes and NONE of the 4 show a Boeing 757 striking the building.  Instead, an argument can be made that an Exodus 2006 Cruise Missile can be seen in the video I quoted above striking the lawn of the Pentagon, and later the building.
     
    Please refute.
     
    You THINK you see a video in that picture.  How you can come to that conclusion beyond any doubt is a joke in and of itself.

    Personally, I believe the eyewitness testimony of everyone that was there as well as the physical evidence over some blurry picture.  But you can believe in whatever fairy tale you like.
     
    ___________

    Now it is your turn.  Explain to me why the eyewitnesses said it was a plane, why many reported jet fuel, why they were able to recover much wreckage from a 757, and how they identified almost all of the bodies. 

    And how did that cruise missile take down those lamp posts???????
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    1.)  NIST said WTC7 fell at free-fall speed
     
    For PART of its collapse.  Once again, selective fact reporting by you. 

    2.)  Rumsfeld said Flight 93 was shot down
     
    So you've never heard this jackass mis-speak before?  Maybe he meant to say it went down and he screwed it up. 

    3.)  FEMA found Nano-Thermite in the WTC7 wreckage
     
    Thermite example already proven to be bullshit...I'm not going through that all again.  Even the guy you posted as proof of your argument was shown to be a fraud....by his employer and his colleagues.  Why do you believe that jackass, no one else does.
    4.)  Out of 158 cameras that keep 24/7 surveillance of the Pentagon, 80 of them would have had a clear shot of Flight 77 striking the building.  The Government released 4 of the 80 tapes and NONE of the 4 show a Boeing 757 striking the building.  Instead, an argument can be made that an Exodus 2006 Cruise Missile can be seen in the video I quoted above striking the lawn of the Pentagon, and later the building.
     
    Please refute.
     
    You THINK you see a video in that picture.  How you can come to that conclusion beyond any doubt is a joke in and of itself.

    Personally, I believe the eyewitness testimony of everyone that was there as well as the physical evidence over some blurry picture.  But you can believe in whatever fairy tale you like.
     
    ___________

    Now it is your turn.  Explain to me why the eyewitnesses said it was a plane, why many reported jet fuel, why they were able to recover much wreckage from a 757, and how they identified almost all of the bodies. 

    And how did that cruise missile take down those lamp posts???????
     
    coldsnap55
    coldsnap55
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2004
    Posts: 9818
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:30 PM ET #841

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    You're not even worth my time.  

    That's because you either don't have an answer or call people MORONS when they don't agree with you.

    Same Hutch....Different thread.  

     

    You and tillyo have the same style....His quote.....

     

     So the terrorist cant use it to further their attacks on us.  Also their is the national secrity reason moron. That was easy!!!!!!!!

     

     

    Like I have said before .....If you can't answer the question....Don't say anything and walk away.

    OOPS.....You already did that. 

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    You're not even worth my time.  

    That's because you either don't have an answer or call people MORONS when they don't agree with you.

    Same Hutch....Different thread.  

     

    You and tillyo have the same style....His quote.....

     

     So the terrorist cant use it to further their attacks on us.  Also their is the national secrity reason moron. That was easy!!!!!!!!

     

     

    Like I have said before .....If you can't answer the question....Don't say anything and walk away.

    OOPS.....You already did that. 

     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:34 PM ET #842

    I can't get over your "Rumsfeld is a bumbling idiot" statement...

    Let's look at Donald Henry Rumsfeld, shall we?

    Institutional affiliations
    Center for Security Policy: Longtime associate; winner of the CSP's 1998 "Keeper of the Flame" award (5)
    Hoover Institution: Member, board of trustees
    Project for the New American Century: Signed PNAC's founding statement of principles as well as two policy letters on Iraq
    Freedom House: Board member
    RAND Corporation: Board member
    Committee for the Free World: Former chairman
    Bohemian Club: Member



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I can't get over your "Rumsfeld is a bumbling idiot" statement...

    Let's look at Donald Henry Rumsfeld, shall we?

    Institutional affiliations
    Center for Security Policy: Longtime associate; winner of the CSP's 1998 "Keeper of the Flame" award (5)
    Hoover Institution: Member, board of trustees
    Project for the New American Century: Signed PNAC's founding statement of principles as well as two policy letters on Iraq
    Freedom House: Board member
    RAND Corporation: Board member
    Committee for the Free World: Former chairman
    Bohemian Club: Member



     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:35 PM ET #843

    (continued)

    Government posts, panels, and commissions
    Secretary of Defense (2001–06)
    U.S. Commission to Assess National Security Space Management and Organization: Chairman (2000)
    U.S. Ballistic Missile Threat Commission: Chairman (1998)
    Secretary of Defense (1975–77)
    White House Chief of Staff in Ford administration (1974–75)
    U.S. Ambassador to NATO (1973–74)
    U.S. Congress: Representative from Illinois (1962–69)
    United States Navy: Various posts, including aviator (1954–57); reserves (1957–1975) Retired as a Navy Captain (1989)



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    (continued)

    Government posts, panels, and commissions
    Secretary of Defense (2001–06)
    U.S. Commission to Assess National Security Space Management and Organization: Chairman (2000)
    U.S. Ballistic Missile Threat Commission: Chairman (1998)
    Secretary of Defense (1975–77)
    White House Chief of Staff in Ford administration (1974–75)
    U.S. Ambassador to NATO (1973–74)
    U.S. Congress: Representative from Illinois (1962–69)
    United States Navy: Various posts, including aviator (1954–57); reserves (1957–1975) Retired as a Navy Captain (1989)



     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:35 PM ET #844

    (continued)

    Corporate connections and business interests
    Gilead Sciences: joined Gilead as a director in 1988 Chairman (1997–2001)
    General Instrument Corporation: Chairman and CEO (1990–93)
    G.D. Searle pharmaceutical company: CEO/Chairman/President (1977–1985)
    Bechtel Corporation: Was involved in Iraq-Bechtel negotiations in the 1980s on a pipeline project
    Gulfstream Aerospace: Former director
    Tribune Company: Former director
    Metricom, Inc.: Former director
    Sears, Roebuck and Co.: Former director
    ABB AB: Former director
    Kellogg Company: director 1985–199? while Carlos Gutierrez (x Cuba 1960) president CEO and chairman Kellogg until named Secretary Commerce under Bush from 2005
    RAND Corporation: Chairman of Board from 1981–1986; 1995–1996
    Bilderberg Group: Member
    Amylin Pharmaceuticals: Former director

    Education
    Princeton University: A.B. (1954)

    Intellectual heritage
    John Boyd of OODA Loop fame.


    Yep... Total idiot... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    (continued)

    Corporate connections and business interests
    Gilead Sciences: joined Gilead as a director in 1988 Chairman (1997–2001)
    General Instrument Corporation: Chairman and CEO (1990–93)
    G.D. Searle pharmaceutical company: CEO/Chairman/President (1977–1985)
    Bechtel Corporation: Was involved in Iraq-Bechtel negotiations in the 1980s on a pipeline project
    Gulfstream Aerospace: Former director
    Tribune Company: Former director
    Metricom, Inc.: Former director
    Sears, Roebuck and Co.: Former director
    ABB AB: Former director
    Kellogg Company: director 1985–199? while Carlos Gutierrez (x Cuba 1960) president CEO and chairman Kellogg until named Secretary Commerce under Bush from 2005
    RAND Corporation: Chairman of Board from 1981–1986; 1995–1996
    Bilderberg Group: Member
    Amylin Pharmaceuticals: Former director

    Education
    Princeton University: A.B. (1954)

    Intellectual heritage
    John Boyd of OODA Loop fame.


    Yep... Total idiot... 
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:46 PM ET #845

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:


    Now it is your turn.  Explain to me why the eyewitnesses said it was a plane, why many reported jet fuel, why they were able to recover much wreckage from a 757, and how they identified almost all of the bodies. 

    And how did that cruise missile take down those lamp posts???????



    Your arguments are HORRIBLE but I'll entertain your questions anyway.

    Read this entire webpage.  When you're done, let me know what questions you want answered that they haven't already answered for you.  

    A cruise missile hit the Pentagon.  Case closed.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:


    Now it is your turn.  Explain to me why the eyewitnesses said it was a plane, why many reported jet fuel, why they were able to recover much wreckage from a 757, and how they identified almost all of the bodies. 

    And how did that cruise missile take down those lamp posts???????



    Your arguments are HORRIBLE but I'll entertain your questions anyway.

    Read this entire webpage.  When you're done, let me know what questions you want answered that they haven't already answered for you.  

    A cruise missile hit the Pentagon.  Case closed.
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 5:50 PM ET #846

    "Never has any physical evidence been presented at or to any commission or other official inquiry. As with all the video tapes from CCTV cameras surrounding the Pentagon, whose existence prior to their seizure by the FBI can at least be independently verified, this claimed evidence — allegedly including the remains of a crashed Boeing 757 — has been classified and removed to a secret storage facility."


    In other words, Hutch, no one has ever seen your so called "evidence" of wreckage and/or bodily remains.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    "Never has any physical evidence been presented at or to any commission or other official inquiry. As with all the video tapes from CCTV cameras surrounding the Pentagon, whose existence prior to their seizure by the FBI can at least be independently verified, this claimed evidence — allegedly including the remains of a crashed Boeing 757 — has been classified and removed to a secret storage facility."


    In other words, Hutch, no one has ever seen your so called "evidence" of wreckage and/or bodily remains.  
     
    nuggins
    nuggins
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 4544
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 6:06 PM ET #847

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:




    Your arguments are HORRIBLE but I'll entertain your questions anyway.

    Read this entire webpage.  When you're done, let me know what questions you want answered that they haven't already answered for you.  

    A cruise missile hit the Pentagon.  Case closed.


    case closed?? umm...ok? in your mind i guess...so...one (or more) of america's finest... said "yes sir. i will fire upon our DOD HQ, and kill innocent people including perhaps kill some of my fellow airmen, navy, Marines whatever."...ummm...yeeeeeah...and we'll make sure to tell the ordinance personnel that "it just fell off" and do the same for every accounting system that goes into firing ANYTHING (outside a theater of actual war) esp. a missile... whateva...puff puff pass man...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:




    Your arguments are HORRIBLE but I'll entertain your questions anyway.

    Read this entire webpage.  When you're done, let me know what questions you want answered that they haven't already answered for you.  

    A cruise missile hit the Pentagon.  Case closed.


    case closed?? umm...ok? in your mind i guess...so...one (or more) of america's finest... said "yes sir. i will fire upon our DOD HQ, and kill innocent people including perhaps kill some of my fellow airmen, navy, Marines whatever."...ummm...yeeeeeah...and we'll make sure to tell the ordinance personnel that "it just fell off" and do the same for every accounting system that goes into firing ANYTHING (outside a theater of actual war) esp. a missile... whateva...puff puff pass man...
     
    nuggins
    nuggins
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 4544
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 6:10 PM ET #848

    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:

    If there were 150+ cameras focused on your/your son's birth, and none of them showed him coming out of the womb?  Then yes, I would question whether or not your son was a test tube baby, or was born naturally.  Wouldn't you?

    Please don't attempt to compare 2 issues without keeping all of the facts in line.  Your son's birth didn't have 150 cameras focused on it.  The Pentagon did.  You cannot compare the two situations.  Period.



    where can i find the fact that the gov't has to release ANY of their surveillance findings to the public?...150 camera's? point me to where that info is.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by smdio:

    If there were 150+ cameras focused on your/your son's birth, and none of them showed him coming out of the womb?  Then yes, I would question whether or not your son was a test tube baby, or was born naturally.  Wouldn't you?

    Please don't attempt to compare 2 issues without keeping all of the facts in line.  Your son's birth didn't have 150 cameras focused on it.  The Pentagon did.  You cannot compare the two situations.  Period.



    where can i find the fact that the gov't has to release ANY of their surveillance findings to the public?...150 camera's? point me to where that info is.


     
    nuggins
    nuggins
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2007
    Posts: 4544
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 6:12 PM ET #849

    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

     

    Son, i hate to burst your bubble, but yes our govt does indeed have satellites that can read the date on a dime.  Take a look at the satellites google uses for their maps, which gets you pretty close.  Go install google earth and see what that can do.

     



    yeah, been to google earth...so what...cool but grainy as all hell...read the date on a dime...lol... shit...i think one of those black op helo's just flew over my house...gonna log off and smash my computer now!!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

     

    Son, i hate to burst your bubble, but yes our govt does indeed have satellites that can read the date on a dime.  Take a look at the satellites google uses for their maps, which gets you pretty close.  Go install google earth and see what that can do.

     



    yeah, been to google earth...so what...cool but grainy as all hell...read the date on a dime...lol... shit...i think one of those black op helo's just flew over my house...gonna log off and smash my computer now!!!
     
     
    smdio
    smdio
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2010
    Posts: 1094
    Posted: Nov. 17, 2010 - 6:13 PM ET #850

    Seems your boy Rumsfeld slipped up again:

    Parade: “This is a question that's been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?”

    Rumsfeld: “There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing — the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues.

    the missile to damage this building [the Pentagon] and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Seems your boy Rumsfeld slipped up again:

    Parade: “This is a question that's been asked by many Americans, but especially by the widows of September 11th. How were we so asleep at the switch? How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?”

    Rumsfeld: “There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands. And the task is to sort through it and see what you can find. And as you find things, the law enforcement officials who have the responsibility to deal with that type of thing — the FBI at the federal level, and although it is not, it's an investigative service as opposed to a police force, it's not a federal police force, as you know. But the state and local law enforcement officials have the responsibility for dealing with those kinds of issues.

    the missile to damage this building [the Pentagon] and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them.”

    All Forums | General Discussion
    «First Previous 343536 ... 616263 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 445,784 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 09/08/2026 977 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 253,244 Covers arrow
    • Couple thoughts 3,953 Covers arrow
    • 9/8 POD 🔥🔥???? 3,448 Covers arrow
    • Tuesday 2,830 Covers arrow
    • Breathtaking ....truly 20,479 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 26,699 Covers arrow
    • Obviously the true face of the republican party 30,558 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 215 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.