My question is if tax dollars are supposed to pay for our Policeman and Fireman as a public service then why would an area be allowed or want to charge a service fee on top of the taxes paid for this to each resident when it is already supposed to be funded by the taxpayers.
And to boot the service fee was only charged to residents outside the city, but not those inside the city. If the Fire Department covers that area, which obviously it does, then his tax dollars should of covered this. If not, what is his and his neighbors tax dollars paying for in that community.
The bottom line here is really an ethics question. Do you do the right thing or the correct thing. The right thing is to put out the fire. The correct thing is to uphold the service fee and not offer services. The $75 is not insurance, but a service fee. Much different then trying to obtain insurance after an incident has already happened.
The other issue here no one is talking about is the man stated to the firefighters when they were on the premises that he would pay whatever he needed for them to put the fire out. How does a human being not respond to that while the firefighters sit there with a hose in hand making sure the flames from his house don't catch the tree on fire.....Fucking brutal...
. Beat the shit out of the guy after, fine him tens of thousands of dollars, take all of his possessions. Do what ever you want just do it after you address the fire. 
Hot Forum Topics
