Everyones betting on Michigan State, thats why i like Michigan +3 (which by the way is a very good and competitive team)
Same as 2 weeks before when everyone liked Georgia Tech and didnt cover.
How do you figure that? the line went from 3 to 1 and now is at 2?
This is downright laughable. If you choose to use this as a way to determine who to bet on...............dude, you're gonna lose a lot of money in your lifetime. 
No doubt that Western Michigan is very solid. I dont know what this guy is talking about. I was going to comment on that point but you beat me to it.
Witness. Did somebody shoot your puppy? Damn bro, you're a bit harsh. First of all, the turnovers in the redzone by ND the game vs Michigan where not the coaches fault. Resse actually checked out of two running plays that were called by the coaches. The play when he tried to throw the fade to Floyd on the 10 yard line was actually called a run. Reese checked out of it and then lost the ball in his throwing motion.
Second. As I have said on this board before, those passes Drob throws up are pre-determined. You can call them prayers, but Al Borges has been doing this a long, long time. He knows more football than this board combined. I'm sure he doesn't tell Drob, "Hey, how about we just throw the ball up and cross our fingers..." It's all about watching film. If you have Roy Roundtree and Hemmingway, and you think your guys can out jump the defenders, then you give them the chance. The first "prayer" in the ND game was caught for a touchdown. The second one was also caught for a 50 yard gain at midfield.. So the proof was in the pudding. Michigan kept going back to their "prayers" b/c ND couldn't stop it. Had ND been able to make a fucking play on the ball, maybe Michigan would have stopped doing it.
Lastly, I love how everybody thinks Michigan just runs Denard and because of that, they suck... First off, they have about 7 different combinations of him running the ball. And why wouldn't you? He is only the one of the most dynamic players on the field every game. They can run QB trap, QB counter, QB sweep, QB Draw. They are all out of different formations, with different blocking schemes up front. It's no different than doing it will a lead back like Edwin Baker or Marcus Lattimore. Yet, when a team does it with a tailback they are considered to have a "stout run game". When Michigan does it, all they have is Denard. It's such a laughable arguement.
Witness. Did somebody shoot your puppy? Damn bro, you're a bit harsh. First of all, the turnovers in the redzone by ND the game vs Michigan where not the coaches fault. Resse actually checked out of two running plays that were called by the coaches. The play when he tried to throw the fade to Floyd on the 10 yard line was actually called a run. Reese checked out of it and then lost the ball in his throwing motion.
So it isnt on the coaches that they allow him to audible there or ever? Would a good coach let this happen?
Second. As I have said on this board before, those passes Drob throws up are pre-determined. You can call them prayers, but Al Borges has been doing this a long, long time. He knows more football than this board combined. I'm sure he doesn't tell Drob, "Hey, how about we just throw the ball up and cross our fingers..." It's all about watching film. If you have Roy Roundtree and Hemmingway, and you think your guys can out jump the defenders, then you give them the chance. The first "prayer" in the ND game was caught for a touchdown. The second one was also caught for a 50 yard gain at midfield.. So the proof was in the pudding. Michigan kept going back to their "prayers" b/c ND couldn't stop it. Had ND been able to make a fucking play on the ball, maybe Michigan would have stopped doing it.
What else was Michigan to do? they were getting worked! If ND had been coached better the outcome is alot diffrent imo.
Lastly, I love how everybody thinks Michigan just runs Denard and because of that, they suck... First off, they have about 7 different combinations of him running the ball. And why wouldn't you? He is only the one of the most dynamic players on the field every game. They can run QB trap, QB counter, QB sweep, QB Draw. They are all out of different formations, with different blocking schemes up front. It's no different than doing it will a lead back like Edwin Baker or Marcus Lattimore. Yet, when a team does it with a tailback they are considered to have a "stout run game". When Michigan does it, all they have is Denard. It's such a laughable arguement.
So running with a lead fullback with a TB and 2 TE is the same as the wildcat? If your wondering why people say, all they have is denard, its because its all they do have. If not, then explain the other stud runner or big playmaker is on thier offense.
Im not saying Michigan cant win i just think they are going to have a hard time with a physical team, which is exactly what happened last year with the same players. went undefeated, state routed them at home and then they went on to lose almost all of the rest of thier games to b10 teams that play physical.
PS my dog didnt die, im trying to save you kncukleheads some money by betting on Michigan.. And make you some by betting on Bronze and Black. 
Did you eat alot of paint chips as a kid?
Second. As I have said on this board before, those passes Drob throws up are pre-determined. You can call them prayers, but Al Borges has been doing this a long, long time. He knows more football than this board combined. I'm sure he doesn't tell Drob, "Hey, how about we just throw the ball up and cross our fingers..." It's all about watching film. If you have Roy Roundtree and Hemmingway, and you think your guys can out jump the defenders, then you give them the chance. The first "prayer" in the ND game was caught for a touchdown. The second one was also caught for a 50 yard gain at midfield.. So the proof was in the pudding. Michigan kept going back to their "prayers" b/c ND couldn't stop it. Had ND been able to make a fucking play on the ball, maybe Michigan would have stopped doing it.
Lastly, I love how everybody thinks Michigan just runs Denard and because of that, they suck... First off, they have about 7 different combinations of him running the ball. And why wouldn't you? He is only the one of the most dynamic players on the field every game. They can run QB trap, QB counter, QB sweep, QB Draw. They are all out of different formations, with different blocking schemes up front. It's no different than doing it will a lead back like Edwin Baker or Marcus Lattimore. Yet, when a team does it with a tailback they are considered to have a "stout run game". When Michigan does it, all they have is Denard. It's such a laughable arguement.
This game is incredibly difficult to cap. Michigan is overrated but they are a good football team. They are explosive on offense (hate DR all you want, but even jahova witness will admit he can score at any time from anywhere on the field) and have been very solid on defense (and GREAT at forcing turnovers). MSU is solid on both sides of the ball and are playing at home.
However, I believe Michigan finally has a good coach and he has changed the attitude of this team. They arn't a joke on defense anymore and the players actually have someone they can believe in (Rodriguez was a joke).
Ultimately, I believe Michigan will win because this senior class which has endured 3 years of embarrassment under RichRod will have to much pride to be swept by MSU. You can't cap something like that but that is my belief.
Good luck.
This game is incredibly difficult to cap. Michigan is overrated but they are a good football team. They are explosive on offense (hate DR all you want, but even jahova witness will admit he can score at any time from anywhere on the field) and have been very solid on defense (and GREAT at forcing turnovers). MSU is solid on both sides of the ball and are playing at home.
However, I believe Michigan finally has a good coach and he has changed the attitude of this team. They arn't a joke on defense anymore and the players actually have someone they can believe in (Rodriguez was a joke).
Ultimately, I believe Michigan will win because this senior class which has endured 3 years of embarrassment under RichRod will have to much pride to be swept by MSU. You can't cap something like that but that is my belief.
Good luck.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
