All Forums | College Football

Why MSU beats Michigan

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 3174
Posts: 55
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted: #1
With Saturday's game being an almost pick em game I think you can reasonable take MSU and be very happy with the post game results.  I think the betting public has no idea how bad UofM really is on offense and defense. They see a 6-0 record and start to drool over a very over rated MSU team.  While MSU has not lived up to it's 1 loss season of last year, the team is very much improved on defense and will be able to cause more than the average UofM turnover.  D.R.'s interception stats show games with 3,1,2,3, no interceptions in a rout of a BAD Minnesota team, and an even less talented Western MIch team.  Michigan will not get a bunch of chances to make up for those turnovers as MSU will run a much more contained and slower offense.  Good Luck to MSU -2
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 852
Posted: #2
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 156
Posted: #3
Very bad Western michgan team??? Shows how much you know about football. They have won every game and covered every game since the Michigan game. Not saying Michigan going win but you are wrong about that part.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 3011
Posted: #4
really bad on offense and defense? 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 524
Posted: #5
Michigan is the play
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 368
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by vibo:

Michigan is the play
this.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 151
Posted: #7

Books wouldnt post this at -3 for a reason. This is a trap game for the betting public. MSU wins by 6-10. Denard is in serious trouble.

 

Quote Originally Posted by mooselucky:

With Saturday's game being an almost pick em game I think you can reasonable take MSU and be very happy with the post game results.  I think the betting public has no idea how bad UofM really is on offense and defense. They see a 6-0 record and start to drool over a very over rated MSU team.  While MSU has not lived up to it's 1 loss season of last year, the team is very much improved on defense and will be able to cause more than the average UofM turnover.  D.R.'s interception stats show games with 3,1,2,3, no interceptions in a rout of a BAD Minnesota team, and an even less talented Western MIch team.  Michigan will not get a bunch of chances to make up for those turnovers as MSU will run a much more contained and slower offense.  Good Luck to MSU -2

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 151
Posted: #8

Quote Originally Posted by DynastyOne:

really bad on offense and defense? 

YES REALLY BAD. Is it even called an offense when all you do is snap it to denard and he runs or just throws up a prayer? HA! your a slapdick. As far as defense goes, theres a reason Mattison blitzes every time. THEY STINK.Denard is in for a long day. Either he beats MSU with the pass or they lose. We know how he is at passing.. see last 3 years....  

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 524
Posted: #9
State lost 31-13 to Notre Dame and Michigan beat Notre Dame 35-31. I f you use logic Michigan should beat State to a suspect offense who only scored 10 against a garbage OSU TEAM.....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3689
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by vibo:

State lost 31-13 to Notre Dame and Michigan beat Notre Dame 35-31. I f you use logic Michigan should beat State to a suspect offense who only scored 10 against a garbage OSU TEAM.....


who would ever use that logic??    
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3284
Posted: #11
the est play in this situation is a no play.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 524
Posted: #12

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 173
Posted: #13
Dennard does it ALONE. MICHIGAN all the way boys
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 3965
Posted: #14

Quote Originally Posted by vibo:

State lost 31-13 to Notre Dame and Michigan beat Notre Dame 35-31. I f you use logic Michigan should beat State to a suspect offense who only scored 10 against a garbage OSU TEAM.....

If it were this easy, we'd all be millionaires and the books would be broke.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 156
Posted: #15
Jahovawitness u should been coach if it that easy to stop them. Notre Dame and Northwestern could used you.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3484
Posted: #16
MSU  
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 113
Posted: #17
Both bad teams, UofM way overrated State has more talent on Def., the cover going away.    
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 624
Posted: #18

I'll go with the team with the better defense and is playing at home. Denard is good, but he is gonna make some costly mistakes.
Michigan St 44 Michigan 31.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 54
Posted: #19

Everyones betting on Michigan State, thats why i like Michigan +3 (which by the way is a very good and competitive team)

Same as 2 weeks before when everyone liked Georgia Tech and didnt cover.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 54
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by vibo:

Michigan is the play

i second that motion bro

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 83
Posted: #21
michigan so overrated msu SU here
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 9147
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by rarafromphilly:

the est play in this situation is a no play.



 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 151
Posted: #23

Quote Originally Posted by vibo:

State lost 31-13 to Notre Dame and Michigan beat Notre Dame 35-31. I f you use logic Michigan should beat State to a suspect offense who only scored 10 against a garbage OSU TEAM.....

LOGIC? How bout how badly coached ND was that game? how bout the 2 str8 drives they drove down running the ball and threw 2 ints in the red zone? How bout the prayers for passes caught? Or the fumble on the goalline that bounced in denards hands.?. If thats logic to you then your retarded. MSU also played on the road and M has had 1 road game against NW. Its obvious you dont follow either team or know anything about logic.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 151
Posted: #24

[Quote: Originally Posted by SatNightFever05]

who would ever use that logic??    
[/

Not someone who lives in California and follows the most OVERRATED TEAM in the last 10 years.

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 151
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by BravesFan1984:

If it were this easy, we'd all be millionaires and the books would be broke.

 

BAM

All Forums | College Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.