• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Big Pirate
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • ROLR Promo Code
      • FanDuel Predicts Promo Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    What do you want? Another ROCK BOTTOM SURPRISE pick.One more time!Another ROCK BOTTOM SURPRISE pick!

    «First Previous 234 ... 111213 Next Last»
    Jason497
    slomotion
    DanCarcillo
    scalabrine
    jcl77
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 30077
    Posts: 314
    «First Previous 234 ... 111213 Next Last»
     
    Jason497
    Jason497
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 250
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 11:05 PM ET #26

    It opened on Bovada at -210 Rousey and been bet all the way down to -155. Either that or a ridiculous amount of reverse line movement is going on.

    I absolutely want Rousey to win but my brain thinks this ends tragically for her.

    Nunes is a blackbelt in Jiu-jitsu and a brown belt in Judo, so her being able to stuff the takedowns and defend Ronda if it does get to the ground is a distinct possibility, she hasn't been submitted since her first fight in 2008.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    It opened on Bovada at -210 Rousey and been bet all the way down to -155. Either that or a ridiculous amount of reverse line movement is going on.

    I absolutely want Rousey to win but my brain thinks this ends tragically for her.

    Nunes is a blackbelt in Jiu-jitsu and a brown belt in Judo, so her being able to stuff the takedowns and defend Ronda if it does get to the ground is a distinct possibility, she hasn't been submitted since her first fight in 2008.
     
    slomotion
    slomotion
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 2852
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 11:12 PM ET #27

    I will say this much..... if Rousey get through this fight, she'll be steered carefully to be in only cupcake fights after that to keep her on top. It's all about the money. Hence why she got an immediate title shot in the first place. If not, it'll be a cyborg or Holm fight right away for big cash for Dana to line his pockets with. Not caring about Rousey anymore due to McGregor being his new cash cow.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I will say this much..... if Rousey get through this fight, she'll be steered carefully to be in only cupcake fights after that to keep her on top. It's all about the money. Hence why she got an immediate title shot in the first place. If not, it'll be a cyborg or Holm fight right away for big cash for Dana to line his pockets with. Not caring about Rousey anymore due to McGregor being his new cash cow.
     
    DanCarcillo
    DanCarcillo
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2013
    Posts: 451
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 11:13 PM ET #28

    I know nothing about MMA and even less about womens MMA but if I know one thing it's that the white mamba can show the versatility. Let's fire it up fellas
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I know nothing about MMA and even less about womens MMA but if I know one thing it's that the white mamba can show the versatility. Let's fire it up fellas
     
    slomotion
    slomotion
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 2852
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 11:14 PM ET #29

    Scal.... any college pick some on the horizon?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Scal.... any college pick some on the horizon?
     
    Jason497
    Jason497
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 250
    Posted: Dec. 20, 2016 - 11:34 PM ET #30

    I don't see Ronda facing Cyborg anytime soon whatsoever. If Ronda losses this fight it will probably be in devastating fashion and she's done.

    If she wins, I think there's definitely some merit to slomotion said in regards to her being protected.

    Case in point? Holly Holm. Dana White is keeping her FAR away from Ronda by putting her...and not Cyborg...in the upcoming title fight for the newly minted UFC Womens Featherweight Championship. If she wins, she will be defending the 145lb title instead of rematching Ronda at 135lbs.

    Cyborg absolutely cannot get to 135. She almost dies getting to 140-145. That fight with Ronda isn't happening and if it does, it will be in a long time, at 145, for a supercard like 200/205 for HUGE money. Cyborg is going to be busy in the immediate future facing the winner of the 145 lb title fight also.

    Looking at the rankings, my guess is her next fight would either be against Juliana Peña, Raquel Pennington or Valentina Shevchenko. She's defeated the #6, #7, #8, #9 ranked fighters and #4 and #10 are fighting for the new 145 belt. Shevchenko and Peña are actually set to face each other next so that could actually be used as an eliminator fight for the next title shot.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I don't see Ronda facing Cyborg anytime soon whatsoever. If Ronda losses this fight it will probably be in devastating fashion and she's done.

    If she wins, I think there's definitely some merit to slomotion said in regards to her being protected.

    Case in point? Holly Holm. Dana White is keeping her FAR away from Ronda by putting her...and not Cyborg...in the upcoming title fight for the newly minted UFC Womens Featherweight Championship. If she wins, she will be defending the 145lb title instead of rematching Ronda at 135lbs.

    Cyborg absolutely cannot get to 135. She almost dies getting to 140-145. That fight with Ronda isn't happening and if it does, it will be in a long time, at 145, for a supercard like 200/205 for HUGE money. Cyborg is going to be busy in the immediate future facing the winner of the 145 lb title fight also.

    Looking at the rankings, my guess is her next fight would either be against Juliana Peña, Raquel Pennington or Valentina Shevchenko. She's defeated the #6, #7, #8, #9 ranked fighters and #4 and #10 are fighting for the new 145 belt. Shevchenko and Peña are actually set to face each other next so that could actually be used as an eliminator fight for the next title shot.
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 12:12 AM ET #31

    Quote Originally Posted by slomotion:

    Scal.... any college pick some on the horizon?

    Yes, in due time. Currently scouting the teams. Caps get much more solid in conference play.

    Carcillo
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by slomotion:

    Scal.... any college pick some on the horizon?

    Yes, in due time. Currently scouting the teams. Caps get much more solid in conference play.

    Carcillo
     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 12:17 AM ET #32

    Quote Originally Posted by Jason497:

    I don't see Ronda facing Cyborg anytime soon whatsoever. If Ronda losses this fight it will probably be in devastating fashion and she's done.

    If she wins, I think there's definitely some merit to slomotion said in regards to her being protected.

    Case in point? Holly Holm. Dana White is keeping her FAR away from Ronda by putting her...and not Cyborg...in the upcoming title fight for the newly minted UFC Womens Featherweight Championship. If she wins, she will be defending the 145lb title instead of rematching Ronda at 135lbs.

    Cyborg absolutely cannot get to 135. She almost dies getting to 140-145. That fight with Ronda isn't happening and if it does, it will be in a long time, at 145, for a supercard like 200/205 for HUGE money. Cyborg is going to be busy in the immediate future facing the winner of the 145 lb title fight also.

    Looking at the rankings, my guess is her next fight would either be against Juliana Peña, Raquel Pennington or Valentina Shevchenko. She's defeated the #6, #7, #8, #9 ranked fighters and #4 and #10 are fighting for the new 145 belt. Shevchenko and Peña are actually set to face each other next so that could actually be used as an eliminator fight for the next title shot.

    Agreed. Cyborg will cripple her and Holm would beat her again. Bigger longer taller boxer. Ronda won't be able to get inside and Holm will know exactly what to do if Ronda goes for a takedown. Holm will punish her again. I really don't think ronda wants to fight Holm again.

    That is why Ronda has said this will be one of her last fights. The current roster can rock her. It's very scary for her. I think she should take the money earned from this fight and then go to the WWe who would reward her handsomely. She wouldn't even have to wrestle all that much and still would get paid a ton.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Jason497:

    I don't see Ronda facing Cyborg anytime soon whatsoever. If Ronda losses this fight it will probably be in devastating fashion and she's done.

    If she wins, I think there's definitely some merit to slomotion said in regards to her being protected.

    Case in point? Holly Holm. Dana White is keeping her FAR away from Ronda by putting her...and not Cyborg...in the upcoming title fight for the newly minted UFC Womens Featherweight Championship. If she wins, she will be defending the 145lb title instead of rematching Ronda at 135lbs.

    Cyborg absolutely cannot get to 135. She almost dies getting to 140-145. That fight with Ronda isn't happening and if it does, it will be in a long time, at 145, for a supercard like 200/205 for HUGE money. Cyborg is going to be busy in the immediate future facing the winner of the 145 lb title fight also.

    Looking at the rankings, my guess is her next fight would either be against Juliana Peña, Raquel Pennington or Valentina Shevchenko. She's defeated the #6, #7, #8, #9 ranked fighters and #4 and #10 are fighting for the new 145 belt. Shevchenko and Peña are actually set to face each other next so that could actually be used as an eliminator fight for the next title shot.

    Agreed. Cyborg will cripple her and Holm would beat her again. Bigger longer taller boxer. Ronda won't be able to get inside and Holm will know exactly what to do if Ronda goes for a takedown. Holm will punish her again. I really don't think ronda wants to fight Holm again.

    That is why Ronda has said this will be one of her last fights. The current roster can rock her. It's very scary for her. I think she should take the money earned from this fight and then go to the WWe who would reward her handsomely. She wouldn't even have to wrestle all that much and still would get paid a ton.
     
    Jason497
    Jason497
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 250
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 12:51 AM ET #33

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


    Agreed. Cyborg will cripple her and Holm would beat her again. Bigger longer taller boxer. Ronda won't be able to get inside and Holm will know exactly what to do if Ronda goes for a takedown. Holm will punish her again. I really don't think ronda wants to fight Holm again.

    That is why Ronda has said this will be one of her last fights. The current roster can rock her. It's very scary for her. I think she should take the money earned from this fight and then go to the WWe who would reward her handsomely. She wouldn't even have to wrestle all that much and still would get paid a ton.


    What you say about the current roster passing her by could be true. I think Johny Hendricks is in a similar boat, Neil Magny (-120) is a real live dog on the undercard of 207 imo.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


    Agreed. Cyborg will cripple her and Holm would beat her again. Bigger longer taller boxer. Ronda won't be able to get inside and Holm will know exactly what to do if Ronda goes for a takedown. Holm will punish her again. I really don't think ronda wants to fight Holm again.

    That is why Ronda has said this will be one of her last fights. The current roster can rock her. It's very scary for her. I think she should take the money earned from this fight and then go to the WWe who would reward her handsomely. She wouldn't even have to wrestle all that much and still would get paid a ton.


    What you say about the current roster passing her by could be true. I think Johny Hendricks is in a similar boat, Neil Magny (-120) is a real live dog on the undercard of 207 imo.
     
    jcl77
    jcl77
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 28
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 1:01 AM ET #34

    Love this pick.

    This will be the 3rd time I've placed a max bet on one of your posts. I only do this when my play of the week matches your capped pick. (ND over wisco and Memphis over SMU)

    I think Nunes wins this fight and I don't think it's close. Same way I felt about Tate against Holm in 196.

    Win or lose, thanks for the info and GL as always

    Let's keep this max bet streak going
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Love this pick.

    This will be the 3rd time I've placed a max bet on one of your posts. I only do this when my play of the week matches your capped pick. (ND over wisco and Memphis over SMU)

    I think Nunes wins this fight and I don't think it's close. Same way I felt about Tate against Holm in 196.

    Win or lose, thanks for the info and GL as always

    Let's keep this max bet streak going
     
    pederson16
    pederson16
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 7359
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 1:28 AM ET #35

    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 
     
    monstergrit
    monstergrit
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 4606
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 2:56 AM ET #36

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    PapaShango
    PapaShango
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 29064
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 5:11 AM ET #37

    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  
     
    PapaShango
    PapaShango
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2010
    Posts: 29064
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 5:19 AM ET #38

    Rousey said she has had an amazing camp and weight is 0 issue, she is on a better pace for her weight cut than she has ever been on.  

    Look at this picture...She is a monster right now...

    https://www.instagram.com/p/BOOFe2hj3xB/?taken-by=rondarousey&hl=en


    UFC knows how much of a better match-up this is for Rousey than Holm would've been.  Did they want the Holm rematch for the $$$?  Probably.  But, now they have lucked into Nunes being champion and Ronda being able to take it off of her.  They also made this other division for Holm because they probably don't want Holm near Ronda once Ronda wins the title back.  They'll give Ronda the winner of Schevchenko/Pena and then go from there.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Rousey said she has had an amazing camp and weight is 0 issue, she is on a better pace for her weight cut than she has ever been on.  

    Look at this picture...She is a monster right now...

    https://www.instagram.com/p/BOOFe2hj3xB/?taken-by=rondarousey&hl=en


    UFC knows how much of a better match-up this is for Rousey than Holm would've been.  Did they want the Holm rematch for the $$$?  Probably.  But, now they have lucked into Nunes being champion and Ronda being able to take it off of her.  They also made this other division for Holm because they probably don't want Holm near Ronda once Ronda wins the title back.  They'll give Ronda the winner of Schevchenko/Pena and then go from there.
     
    jdr016
    jdr016
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 6591
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 6:38 AM ET #39

    I'm glad to see you branching out to other sports. 

    But, this should be posted in the MMA section. 

    I know you desperately crave attention. But, people would have still found it. 


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'm glad to see you branching out to other sports. 

    But, this should be posted in the MMA section. 

    I know you desperately crave attention. But, people would have still found it. 


     
    jdr016
    jdr016
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 6591
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 6:40 AM ET #40

    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 

    I'm just wondering if Scalabrine is talking about his own depression or Rousey's? 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 

    I'm just wondering if Scalabrine is talking about his own depression or Rousey's? 
     
    jdr016
    jdr016
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2006
    Posts: 6591
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 7:05 AM ET #41

    Quote Originally Posted by Jrod6:

     
    To be honest with you the best bet for this fight  is 

    OVER 1.5 rounds 

    Gl, also why post this in college? MMA thread has some decent posters 

    The over jumps out to me as well. It appears like the under is going to be a public play. 

    I think Rousey is a lot more conservative after she tried to bum rush Holm and played right into her hands.

    The longer this fight is, the more trouble Nunes will find yourself in. She hasn't looked good in her two UFC fights that went into the third round. 

    - She lost to Cat Zingano. Who lost to Rousey in 14 seconds by the way. 

    - Nunes also barely survived Valentina Shevchenko. While she got the decision because she won the first two rounds. She got dominated in the third round to the point where the fight was almost stopped. If that was a five round fight, she loses. 

    No official plays for me yet. But, my leans are the over and Rousey. 



    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Jrod6:

     
    To be honest with you the best bet for this fight  is 

    OVER 1.5 rounds 

    Gl, also why post this in college? MMA thread has some decent posters 

    The over jumps out to me as well. It appears like the under is going to be a public play. 

    I think Rousey is a lot more conservative after she tried to bum rush Holm and played right into her hands.

    The longer this fight is, the more trouble Nunes will find yourself in. She hasn't looked good in her two UFC fights that went into the third round. 

    - She lost to Cat Zingano. Who lost to Rousey in 14 seconds by the way. 

    - Nunes also barely survived Valentina Shevchenko. While she got the decision because she won the first two rounds. She got dominated in the third round to the point where the fight was almost stopped. If that was a five round fight, she loses. 

    No official plays for me yet. But, my leans are the over and Rousey. 



     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 7:43 AM ET #42

    Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:

    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  

    Christmas is a time of forgiveness.

    And we, the Nunes bettors, must forgive this misguided post, full of classic pitfalls in capping which Papa has fallen prey to.

    Papa is enamored with Rousey's back muscles and they are impressive, however they are clearly roided and I'll get to that.

    Question: Did anyone ever buy those classic wrestling magazines where two women are fighting in bathing suits and leotards?

    These fights took place on kitchen floors, apartment couches, near bedroom closets. Anyone remember this? They used to sell VHS tapes of these fights. $29.99. Good money in those days. People paid it. They wanted their leotards in action.

    A woman would have another in a leg lock, thick thighs wrapped around another slender torso. This of course would accentuate the trapped woman's bust as she (playfully) writhed in pain (for the camera) begging to have the other woman release her anaconda-esque vice grip.

    What was the point of this? Why in a young man's wrestling magazine? For innocent sexual arousal of course, in its infancy before the internet. The women only grappled, no kissing or anything else, but in those days it drove some of the magazine buyers WILD.

    So they'd go to the convenience store counter with Brutus Beefcake on the cover of the magazine and grunt as they paid, but really, their Beefcake was inside and it wasn't Brutus, and they whimpered inside begging to be dominated as they brought their two lady grapplers home in a opaque plastic bag. Those lady grapplers were their paradise, even the mere pictures. Fighting in the kitchen on a linoleum floor beneath a toaster oven and blender was a turn on. These women were their She-Ra's of sorts. Built, but still WOMEN at their core. Beautiful and powerful. Enough woman to arouse them but enough brute strength to make them say "MERCY"!

    When I see some men talk about this Rousey instagram post, back muscles rippling like waves on a Hawaiian shore, I am reminded of the fetish some have for the lady grapplers of yesteryear. And perhaps, just perhaps, this has blinded the bettor sufficiently to take Rousey and here purported "value" here, that dominant female figure now skewing their capping.

    It is conjecture, but it must be put on the table as these counter-caps come fast and furious. 

    This is not an insult. These women were hot. But we have to put this all in perspective and put everything on the table to get to winning cap, of which Rousey, is not.

    Papa, I'll be back to break down some of the other innaccuracies. Good attempt.

    Christmas.

    Forgiveness.

    Forgive yourself and take Nunes.






    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:

    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  

    Christmas is a time of forgiveness.

    And we, the Nunes bettors, must forgive this misguided post, full of classic pitfalls in capping which Papa has fallen prey to.

    Papa is enamored with Rousey's back muscles and they are impressive, however they are clearly roided and I'll get to that.

    Question: Did anyone ever buy those classic wrestling magazines where two women are fighting in bathing suits and leotards?

    These fights took place on kitchen floors, apartment couches, near bedroom closets. Anyone remember this? They used to sell VHS tapes of these fights. $29.99. Good money in those days. People paid it. They wanted their leotards in action.

    A woman would have another in a leg lock, thick thighs wrapped around another slender torso. This of course would accentuate the trapped woman's bust as she (playfully) writhed in pain (for the camera) begging to have the other woman release her anaconda-esque vice grip.

    What was the point of this? Why in a young man's wrestling magazine? For innocent sexual arousal of course, in its infancy before the internet. The women only grappled, no kissing or anything else, but in those days it drove some of the magazine buyers WILD.

    So they'd go to the convenience store counter with Brutus Beefcake on the cover of the magazine and grunt as they paid, but really, their Beefcake was inside and it wasn't Brutus, and they whimpered inside begging to be dominated as they brought their two lady grapplers home in a opaque plastic bag. Those lady grapplers were their paradise, even the mere pictures. Fighting in the kitchen on a linoleum floor beneath a toaster oven and blender was a turn on. These women were their She-Ra's of sorts. Built, but still WOMEN at their core. Beautiful and powerful. Enough woman to arouse them but enough brute strength to make them say "MERCY"!

    When I see some men talk about this Rousey instagram post, back muscles rippling like waves on a Hawaiian shore, I am reminded of the fetish some have for the lady grapplers of yesteryear. And perhaps, just perhaps, this has blinded the bettor sufficiently to take Rousey and here purported "value" here, that dominant female figure now skewing their capping.

    It is conjecture, but it must be put on the table as these counter-caps come fast and furious. 

    This is not an insult. These women were hot. But we have to put this all in perspective and put everything on the table to get to winning cap, of which Rousey, is not.

    Papa, I'll be back to break down some of the other innaccuracies. Good attempt.

    Christmas.

    Forgiveness.

    Forgive yourself and take Nunes.






     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 8:28 AM ET #43

    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 


    Funny shi* but that angle will reward all of us who believe in it handsomely
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by pederson16:

    And there is another angle here:

    It's the "Fading Clinical Depression" angle.



    now THAT is the funniest sh*t I've heard in ages..... 


    Funny shi* but that angle will reward all of us who believe in it handsomely
     
    Jrod6
    Jrod6
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 4252
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 8:43 AM ET #44

    Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:

    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  


    Smart man, Rhonda wins this one
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:

    Sorry, Scal, but you're too into the media narrative.  You got a loser there.  I've dug deep into this fight and regardless, you have terrible value on Nunes.  Nunes is not some monster that you may think she is.  The first thing you need to know about Nunes is she fades.  She fades in just about every fight she's in.


    Let's look at her last 5 UFC fights.


    Nunes around +175 vs Cat Zingano.  
    Nunes won the 1st round, but then lost the 2nd, and was eventually TKOd in the 3rd.  Faded considerably after the 1st round.  Rousey took out Zingano in 14 seconds.

    Nunes around -600 vs Baszier
    Baszier was on a bad streak, basically done with the UFC.  They gave Nunes this fight to get her back on track.  Easy 1R TKO.  

    Nunes around +200 vs McMann
    This was an impressive 1R sub, however McMann was coming off a loss to Tate.  Good win for Nunes, but still not that impressive.  Rousey took out McMann in 1 minute.  

    Nunes around Even vs Shevchenko
    Nunes took the 1st, the 2nd was close, but again she faded late 2nd, and she got pieced up in the 3rd.  Nunes won by Unanimous decision.  If this was a 5 round fight, Shevchenko would have won easily.

    Nunes around +120 vs Tate for Title
    Tate went into this fight way too confident, did way too much press, and was not on her game/was just about done with UFC.  It was impressive by Nunes, but let's not forget that Rousey made a better Tate tap twice.  And Tate looked miserable a few weeks ago in her next fight/last fight in UFC.  Tate also was getting destroyed by Holm before she got the 5R Sub.


    The bottom line is, you are getting horrible value.  Rousey opened at -320 and the media narratives had people drive this price all the way down.  All the value is on Rousey right now.  And you talk about the Holm fight.  Well, let's talk about it.  She took the fight way sooner than she should've because Dana White asked her to move up the fight, so she had a shorter camp than usual.  The fight was also in Australia, and we can be honest and say Holly Holm was just a bad match-up for Rousey.  Rousey did not have a good game plan and fought right into what Holm wanted.  Nunes is certainly not near the match-up problem Holm is for Rousey.

    Rousey's last several fight odds.

    vs Holm ~ -1200
    vs Correia ~ 1700
    vs Zingano ~ -1000
    vs Davis ~ -1200
    vs McMann ~ -400
    vs Tate ~ -700
    vs Carmouche ~ -900
    vs Kaufman ~ -900
    vs Tate ~ -400


    Thinking you are getting good value with Nunes at +135 is just wrong.  All of the value is on Rousey.  I cannot believe how much the public is driving this line down, but Rousey will be one of my biggest MMA bets in some time.  Good luck, Scal.  You will need it.  


    Smart man, Rhonda wins this one
     
    Jrod6
    Jrod6
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2015
    Posts: 4252
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 8:44 AM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:

    I'm glad to see you branching out to other sports. 

    But, this should be posted in the MMA section. 

    I know you desperately crave attention. But, people would have still found it. 




    Another smart man who knows what he's talking about 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by jdr016:

    I'm glad to see you branching out to other sports. 

    But, this should be posted in the MMA section. 

    I know you desperately crave attention. But, people would have still found it. 




    Another smart man who knows what he's talking about 
     
    CASTORTROY
    CASTORTROY
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2004
    Posts: 2109
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 8:54 AM ET #46

    Scal,

    Love reading your take on all sports, the angels you come from are what us bettors need to gain the slight advantages on the house. Normally I would agree with your write-up if it pertained to almost any other sport. This is MMA and much like boxing it is truly dictated by HUGE money. They cant let RR fade to oblivion, not just yet. They need a few more "pay days" from her. She will win to fight at least another day!!


     

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User

    Scal,

    Love reading your take on all sports, the angels you come from are what us bettors need to gain the slight advantages on the house. Normally I would agree with your write-up if it pertained to almost any other sport. This is MMA and much like boxing it is truly dictated by HUGE money. They cant let RR fade to oblivion, not just yet. They need a few more "pay days" from her. She will win to fight at least another day!!


     

     
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hugh_Jorgan
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2002
    Posts: 22961
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 9:11 AM ET #47

    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


    This is a pick. It is a +135 bet after all. And the Penn State reference is to satisfy people like yourself, who spend countless days and nights frothing at the mouth for me to post. It is simply so this thread doesn't get moved (and was a wink and a nod to the win over Wisconsin) since you'd probably tell Covers help about it. Look how lightening fast you showed up here. Good lord.

    And if you don't know who Ronda Rousey is, get back to your meth induced slumber.

    Scary part is that you actually believe some of this 


    I don't post in Covers Help ... please don't confuse me with your boyfriend, who basically lives in that forum.


    I don't do drugs, with the lone exception of some occasional cannabis.
    I don't even drink alcohol, so meth is not on the menu for me. Sorry 

    Scal, if we don't chat again before Sunday, Merry Christmas 
    bigreds daddy
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:


    This is a pick. It is a +135 bet after all. And the Penn State reference is to satisfy people like yourself, who spend countless days and nights frothing at the mouth for me to post. It is simply so this thread doesn't get moved (and was a wink and a nod to the win over Wisconsin) since you'd probably tell Covers help about it. Look how lightening fast you showed up here. Good lord.

    And if you don't know who Ronda Rousey is, get back to your meth induced slumber.

    Scary part is that you actually believe some of this 


    I don't post in Covers Help ... please don't confuse me with your boyfriend, who basically lives in that forum.


    I don't do drugs, with the lone exception of some occasional cannabis.
    I don't even drink alcohol, so meth is not on the menu for me. Sorry 

    Scal, if we don't chat again before Sunday, Merry Christmas 
     
    kvs23
    kvs23
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 776
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 10:51 AM ET #48

    Hi SCAL

    ONE LAST TIME I will request to meet you (remember I was the HBS finance guy who plays lot of big NYC poker games).

    There is so much potential to discuss (staking you in games but discussing sports strategy).  I have a site that allows action points - i.e. $X per point.  So if I do 40 action points for $1 a point and St Johns is -5 - then every point above spread I will $1/point and -$1/point for below - with cap of $40 win or loss.  So I did HUGE action points as seemed like the tails were fatter on one side (ST John blowout - and I won a lot).  

    Best game to do action points is like Brady vs Manning when line is pick or close - no shot Manning wins by 40 (they shut it down) - but Brady could.

    From a nerd math standpoint - Vegas lines are set so MEDIANS are the line (GB has 8 games over and 8 games under) - but action points are paid by average - so in cases where average does NOT equal medians (rare spots) - player has huge edge.

    I made money on it with your St John's play.

    Let's talk man - meet me for coffee - what's the harm?


    2.  Your record was 35-17 before last wknd - so should be 35-19 now - just so the trolls don't cry about inflation.

    GOOD LUCK MAN.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hi SCAL

    ONE LAST TIME I will request to meet you (remember I was the HBS finance guy who plays lot of big NYC poker games).

    There is so much potential to discuss (staking you in games but discussing sports strategy).  I have a site that allows action points - i.e. $X per point.  So if I do 40 action points for $1 a point and St Johns is -5 - then every point above spread I will $1/point and -$1/point for below - with cap of $40 win or loss.  So I did HUGE action points as seemed like the tails were fatter on one side (ST John blowout - and I won a lot).  

    Best game to do action points is like Brady vs Manning when line is pick or close - no shot Manning wins by 40 (they shut it down) - but Brady could.

    From a nerd math standpoint - Vegas lines are set so MEDIANS are the line (GB has 8 games over and 8 games under) - but action points are paid by average - so in cases where average does NOT equal medians (rare spots) - player has huge edge.

    I made money on it with your St John's play.

    Let's talk man - meet me for coffee - what's the harm?


    2.  Your record was 35-17 before last wknd - so should be 35-19 now - just so the trolls don't cry about inflation.

    GOOD LUCK MAN.

     
    scalabrine
    scalabrine
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2006
    Posts: 28221
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 11:36 AM ET #49

    Quote Originally Posted by kvs23:

    Hi SCAL

    ONE LAST TIME I will request to meet you (remember I was the HBS finance guy who plays lot of big NYC poker games).

    There is so much potential to discuss (staking you in games but discussing sports strategy).  I have a site that allows action points - i.e. $X per point.  So if I do 40 action points for $1 a point and St Johns is -5 - then every point above spread I will $1/point and -$1/point for below - with cap of $40 win or loss.  So I did HUGE action points as seemed like the tails were fatter on one side (ST John blowout - and I won a lot).  

    Best game to do action points is like Brady vs Manning when line is pick or close - no shot Manning wins by 40 (they shut it down) - but Brady could.

    From a nerd math standpoint - Vegas lines are set so MEDIANS are the line (GB has 8 games over and 8 games under) - but action points are paid by average - so in cases where average does NOT equal medians (rare spots) - player has huge edge.

    I made money on it with your St John's play.

    Let's talk man - meet me for coffee - what's the harm?


    2.  Your record was 35-17 before last wknd - so should be 35-19 now - just so the trolls don't cry about inflation.

    GOOD LUCK MAN.


    Thanks for the record correction. I always welcome it. More interested in the write-up at times and I should be more careful.

    Interesting stuff kvs but we can't meet. Nothing personal of course. I appreciate the offer though. Good luck with the poker games! Here's a sick hand for your entertainment:

     https://youtu.be/Gl4cKFCP2eg
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by kvs23:

    Hi SCAL

    ONE LAST TIME I will request to meet you (remember I was the HBS finance guy who plays lot of big NYC poker games).

    There is so much potential to discuss (staking you in games but discussing sports strategy).  I have a site that allows action points - i.e. $X per point.  So if I do 40 action points for $1 a point and St Johns is -5 - then every point above spread I will $1/point and -$1/point for below - with cap of $40 win or loss.  So I did HUGE action points as seemed like the tails were fatter on one side (ST John blowout - and I won a lot).  

    Best game to do action points is like Brady vs Manning when line is pick or close - no shot Manning wins by 40 (they shut it down) - but Brady could.

    From a nerd math standpoint - Vegas lines are set so MEDIANS are the line (GB has 8 games over and 8 games under) - but action points are paid by average - so in cases where average does NOT equal medians (rare spots) - player has huge edge.

    I made money on it with your St John's play.

    Let's talk man - meet me for coffee - what's the harm?


    2.  Your record was 35-17 before last wknd - so should be 35-19 now - just so the trolls don't cry about inflation.

    GOOD LUCK MAN.


    Thanks for the record correction. I always welcome it. More interested in the write-up at times and I should be more careful.

    Interesting stuff kvs but we can't meet. Nothing personal of course. I appreciate the offer though. Good luck with the poker games! Here's a sick hand for your entertainment:

     https://youtu.be/Gl4cKFCP2eg
     
     
    Ganda
    Ganda
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2011
    Posts: 46859
    Posted: Dec. 21, 2016 - 11:39 AM ET #50

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Scary part is that you actually believe some of this 


    I don't post in Covers Help ... please don't confuse me with your boyfriend, who basically lives in that forum.


    I don't do drugs, with the lone exception of some occasional cannabis.
    I don't even drink alcohol, so meth is not on the menu for me. Sorry 

    Scal, if we don't chat again before Sunday, Merry Christmas 

    That's some nice colouring there lil hugh! Good job! 

    Hey, I know it's pointless to even bring it up, because you love your world in black and white (mostly white of course), but not everybody who loathes you, loves Scal. I'm sure people get that, even if you don't.

    Never trust anyone who doesn't drink alcohol. Especially around kids and small animals.
    CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh_Jorgan:


    Scary part is that you actually believe some of this 


    I don't post in Covers Help ... please don't confuse me with your boyfriend, who basically lives in that forum.


    I don't do drugs, with the lone exception of some occasional cannabis.
    I don't even drink alcohol, so meth is not on the menu for me. Sorry 

    Scal, if we don't chat again before Sunday, Merry Christmas 

    That's some nice colouring there lil hugh! Good job! 

    Hey, I know it's pointless to even bring it up, because you love your world in black and white (mostly white of course), but not everybody who loathes you, loves Scal. I'm sure people get that, even if you don't.

    Never trust anyone who doesn't drink alcohol. Especially around kids and small animals.
    All Forums | College Football
    «First Previous 234 ... 111213 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 444,300 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 09/03/2026 755 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,075 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 249,807 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 217 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2025 65,867 Covers arrow
    • Thursday 2,271 Covers arrow
    • This play will save my reputation on here 2,092 Covers arrow
    • Thursday's grind 1,191 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. Sept. 03, 2026 * MLB Baseball Plays*** 1,570 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.