I like the Under in the Mizzou game a lot as well.....
What do yuo think of the over 59 in the ND/Nev game?? I like the over because I think if ND covers they are gonna have to put up over 38 because I think Nevada is good for at least 24.....kinda seeing a ND 45 Nev 27 final score.....
gl bro....like the rest of your card as well, but dont think I can bet on Washington.....
Hows it going Train? Yeah I'm starting to think that might be the best looking total on the board as of now. I don't even see that thing reaching 50 honestly. As for the Notre Dame total I'm not sure yet, I don't like playing overs for one and for two I'm really not sure Nevada is going to put up 24. I think they are going to struggle to score points which is opposed to a lot of peoples opinions which I really don't care. I think they hit 17 honestly. I have Notre Dame winning like 38-17 in that area maybe worse. I just think this is a very bad matchup for Nevada but whatever. As for Washington yeah its rough to bet on an 0-12 team, but I trust my instincts and research. I think this game is going to be a whole lot closer than people think. I have wrote in several other peoples threads about my thoughts on that game. I do not trust a QB with a few starts on the road against an extremely hungry team. Plus LSU's defense is overrated. I think Locker does enough to keep it somewhat close. Good luck this season buddy.
Now if they still had Ryan Perriloux it might be a different story.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:
whats up Whodey???
I like the Under in the Mizzou game a lot as well.....
What do yuo think of the over 59 in the ND/Nev game?? I like the over because I think if ND covers they are gonna have to put up over 38 because I think Nevada is good for at least 24.....kinda seeing a ND 45 Nev 27 final score.....
gl bro....like the rest of your card as well, but dont think I can bet on Washington.....
Hows it going Train? Yeah I'm starting to think that might be the best looking total on the board as of now. I don't even see that thing reaching 50 honestly. As for the Notre Dame total I'm not sure yet, I don't like playing overs for one and for two I'm really not sure Nevada is going to put up 24. I think they are going to struggle to score points which is opposed to a lot of peoples opinions which I really don't care. I think they hit 17 honestly. I have Notre Dame winning like 38-17 in that area maybe worse. I just think this is a very bad matchup for Nevada but whatever. As for Washington yeah its rough to bet on an 0-12 team, but I trust my instincts and research. I think this game is going to be a whole lot closer than people think. I have wrote in several other peoples threads about my thoughts on that game. I do not trust a QB with a few starts on the road against an extremely hungry team. Plus LSU's defense is overrated. I think Locker does enough to keep it somewhat close. Good luck this season buddy.
Now if they still had Ryan Perriloux it might be a different story.
Western Michigan +12 Notre Dame -14 Arizona -12 Washington +16 Oklahoma State -5.5 Toledo +12 Oregon +5.5 - Thursday Kentucky -14 Illinois/Missouri Under 60 Navy/Ohio State Over 46.5 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5 *
Adding:
Minnesota -6.5
Paulus
This looks like a disaster about to take place.
0
Morning Update:
Western Michigan +12 Notre Dame -14 Arizona -12 Washington +16 Oklahoma State -5.5 Toledo +12 Oregon +5.5 - Thursday Kentucky -14 Illinois/Missouri Under 60 Navy/Ohio State Over 46.5 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5 *
Good pks Whodey.....any particular reasoning for Udub +16?....just too many points in the Puget?....
gwjtf
I'm really thinking that Washington is gonna shock a lot of
people. A lot of people seem to forget about Jake Locker, whom I think
can be the big difference in this game. Lets not forget what he did as
a Freshman 2 years ago. Last year injuries really hurt the UW team.
They were possibly a .500 ball club that went 0-12. I can see a
backdoor but I have them playing them tough. I can really
see this game coming down to the wire. I feel very strongly that it
might. I do want a better line on this game, I must admit. Currently
at +16 I'd probably play very small at this point. Although my gut is
telling me to jam it. If Washington can avoid turning the ball over
against a very overrated defense then they play them to the wire. I
can really see Jordan Jefferson turning the ball over a few times in
this game. Washington is hungry 14 straight losses. Talent wise is no
question in favor of LSU, but that travel is gonna be brutal. One of
the biggest problems for Washington last season was getting there
defense off the field. I don't think they are near as bad as the
numbers indicated. Locker will provide more first downs, which keeps
the defense fresh. I just think that Locker has a lot to prove and
will do it. UW averaged under 100 yards a game rushing last season,
but with Locker back that number should go way up. I just keep
reiterating to myself that this team was 0-12 last season, which keeps
me from really thinking that they can pull an upset.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gwjtf:
Good pks Whodey.....any particular reasoning for Udub +16?....just too many points in the Puget?....
gwjtf
I'm really thinking that Washington is gonna shock a lot of
people. A lot of people seem to forget about Jake Locker, whom I think
can be the big difference in this game. Lets not forget what he did as
a Freshman 2 years ago. Last year injuries really hurt the UW team.
They were possibly a .500 ball club that went 0-12. I can see a
backdoor but I have them playing them tough. I can really
see this game coming down to the wire. I feel very strongly that it
might. I do want a better line on this game, I must admit. Currently
at +16 I'd probably play very small at this point. Although my gut is
telling me to jam it. If Washington can avoid turning the ball over
against a very overrated defense then they play them to the wire. I
can really see Jordan Jefferson turning the ball over a few times in
this game. Washington is hungry 14 straight losses. Talent wise is no
question in favor of LSU, but that travel is gonna be brutal. One of
the biggest problems for Washington last season was getting there
defense off the field. I don't think they are near as bad as the
numbers indicated. Locker will provide more first downs, which keeps
the defense fresh. I just think that Locker has a lot to prove and
will do it. UW averaged under 100 yards a game rushing last season,
but with Locker back that number should go way up. I just keep
reiterating to myself that this team was 0-12 last season, which keeps
me from really thinking that they can pull an upset.
[Quote: Originally Posted by Whodeysb09] Updated List:
Western Michigan +12 Notre Dame -14 Minnesota -6.5 Arizona -12 Washington +16 Oklahoma State -5.5 Toledo +12 Kentucky -14 Illinois/Missouri Under 60 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5 Utah State+21 Colorado -11
Oregon is gone for now,
Adding Colorado -11 as now an official lean.
Nice List..Have not had much time to look but think LSU will be the sleeper team out of the SEC. Not sure what to think about VT & Bama. I will probably stay away from that one. I think GA & Auburn will be a little better then people think. GL this season Let's make some
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by Whodeysb09] Updated List:
Western Michigan +12 Notre Dame -14 Minnesota -6.5 Arizona -12 Washington +16 Oklahoma State -5.5 Toledo +12 Kentucky -14 Illinois/Missouri Under 60 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5 Utah State+21 Colorado -11
Oregon is gone for now,
Adding Colorado -11 as now an official lean.
Nice List..Have not had much time to look but think LSU will be the sleeper team out of the SEC. Not sure what to think about VT & Bama. I will probably stay away from that one. I think GA & Auburn will be a little better then people think. GL this season Let's make some
csp - I think LSU will be a sleeper team as well. Just because I think Washington plays them tough, doesn't mean I think LSU is bad or that they will be bad. Good luck bro. Lets make lots of money
0
csp - I think LSU will be a sleeper team as well. Just because I think Washington plays them tough, doesn't mean I think LSU is bad or that they will be bad. Good luck bro. Lets make lots of money
Lots of good stuff here, as always. Good luck. Especially like KY. I'm already on Oregon. That game feels like a solid bowl game and I'll take the points with the better conference. Would be all over Colorado, if not for the in-state rivalry aspect. The dog has done well in this series over the years. Still might play it. Unlike many here, I like Hawkins. Boise wouldn't exist without the guy. Good luck this year, bud.
0
Lots of good stuff here, as always. Good luck. Especially like KY. I'm already on Oregon. That game feels like a solid bowl game and I'll take the points with the better conference. Would be all over Colorado, if not for the in-state rivalry aspect. The dog has done well in this series over the years. Still might play it. Unlike many here, I like Hawkins. Boise wouldn't exist without the guy. Good luck this year, bud.
looks pretty good... starting to think you might be right about the ND-Nevada game... i'm interested in betting on both teams this year, so i might just gauge them and not bet this one...
you know my thoughts on LSU-UW...
0
looks pretty good... starting to think you might be right about the ND-Nevada game... i'm interested in betting on both teams this year, so i might just gauge them and not bet this one...
Lots of good stuff here, as always. Good luck. Especially like KY. I'm already on Oregon. That game feels like a solid bowl game and I'll take the points with the better conference. Would be all over Colorado, if not for the in-state rivalry aspect. The dog has done well in this series over the years. Still might play it. Unlike many here, I like Hawkins. Boise wouldn't exist without the guy. Good luck this year, bud.
I think Colorado handles business against Colorado State. The dog has done well in the series. As for the Oregon/Boise State matchup I've been flipping back and forth so I might just stay away. Good luck this season buddy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Skipster:
Lots of good stuff here, as always. Good luck. Especially like KY. I'm already on Oregon. That game feels like a solid bowl game and I'll take the points with the better conference. Would be all over Colorado, if not for the in-state rivalry aspect. The dog has done well in this series over the years. Still might play it. Unlike many here, I like Hawkins. Boise wouldn't exist without the guy. Good luck this year, bud.
I think Colorado handles business against Colorado State. The dog has done well in the series. As for the Oregon/Boise State matchup I've been flipping back and forth so I might just stay away. Good luck this season buddy.
looks pretty good... starting to think you might be right about the ND-Nevada game... i'm interested in betting on both teams this year, so i might just gauge them and not bet this one...
you know my thoughts on LSU-UW...
So starting to see things my way I see
I can't wait until that game. I'm dying for the season to start. I know your thoughts on UW. Hell I still might not play the game. As of now I would though. I'm not going to wager on anything probably until about a week before the season. Kinda want to wait on injuries and such.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ice4Blood:
looks pretty good... starting to think you might be right about the ND-Nevada game... i'm interested in betting on both teams this year, so i might just gauge them and not bet this one...
you know my thoughts on LSU-UW...
So starting to see things my way I see
I can't wait until that game. I'm dying for the season to start. I know your thoughts on UW. Hell I still might not play the game. As of now I would though. I'm not going to wager on anything probably until about a week before the season. Kinda want to wait on injuries and such.
Also going to add numbers I would still take the game at.
Western Michigan +12- /+11 or more Notre Dame -14solid Minnesota -6.5- /-8 Arizona -13 /-14 Washington +16solid Oklahoma State -5.5-/ -7 Toledo +12/+10 or more Kentucky -14/-17 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Utah State+21 solid or more Colorado -11 /-13 Penn State -27 /-30 Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53
Adding: Penn State -27 Stanford/Washington State Under 56
0
Updated List: 2 more leans this morning.
Also going to add numbers I would still take the game at.
Western Michigan +12- /+11 or more Notre Dame -14solid Minnesota -6.5- /-8 Arizona -13 /-14 Washington +16solid Oklahoma State -5.5-/ -7 Toledo +12/+10 or more Kentucky -14/-17 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Utah State+21 solid or more Colorado -11 /-13 Penn State -27 /-30 Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53
Adding: Penn State -27 Stanford/Washington State Under 56
Scraped quite a few games today...been working for several hours now...here is my new list. Games are now in order of how I feel about a game from strongest to you get the idea. Updated List:
Also going to add numbers I would still take the game at. Arizona -13 /-17 Penn State -27 /-32.5 Western Michigan +12 /+10.5 or more Florida State -5.5 /-7 Kentucky -14/-17 Notre Dame -14solid Oklahoma State -5.5/ -7 Eastern Michigan -5 Clemson -19.5 /-20.5 Oklahoma -21.5/-23 Washington +16solid Missouri +6.5 or better Rutgers -5.5 or less is another lean. I'm really starting to like Rutgers more and more. I think they are the best team in the Big East. Totals in order as well. Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Notre Dame/Nevada over 61.5/63
One more game...that I might be playing..
After a little bit of research I'm starting to like
Missouri +6.5 would like to catch a td or more, but I'm really starting to grow fondly of this one.
0
Scraped quite a few games today...been working for several hours now...here is my new list. Games are now in order of how I feel about a game from strongest to you get the idea. Updated List:
Also going to add numbers I would still take the game at. Arizona -13 /-17 Penn State -27 /-32.5 Western Michigan +12 /+10.5 or more Florida State -5.5 /-7 Kentucky -14/-17 Notre Dame -14solid Oklahoma State -5.5/ -7 Eastern Michigan -5 Clemson -19.5 /-20.5 Oklahoma -21.5/-23 Washington +16solid Missouri +6.5 or better Rutgers -5.5 or less is another lean. I'm really starting to like Rutgers more and more. I think they are the best team in the Big East. Totals in order as well. Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58 Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Notre Dame/Nevada over 61.5/63
One more game...that I might be playing..
After a little bit of research I'm starting to like
Missouri +6.5 would like to catch a td or more, but I'm really starting to grow fondly of this one.
not encouraging or discouraging any play whodey, just some thoughts on the Army-EMU matchup - E Michigan has won 1 game in the last 3 yrs by more than 5 pts (W Mich in 2007) other than Ind St and Howard, of course they were only favorites a couple times (short dogs in most though), then again Army lost most of their OL and LT weighs in at 248 and they have a 6'10 283 lb WR, key obviously is EMU defending the run since Army can do little else, not their best area last couple years
look forward to checking out final picks - BOL
0
not encouraging or discouraging any play whodey, just some thoughts on the Army-EMU matchup - E Michigan has won 1 game in the last 3 yrs by more than 5 pts (W Mich in 2007) other than Ind St and Howard, of course they were only favorites a couple times (short dogs in most though), then again Army lost most of their OL and LT weighs in at 248 and they have a 6'10 283 lb WR, key obviously is EMU defending the run since Army can do little else, not their best area last couple years
not encouraging or discouraging any play whodey, just some thoughts on the Army-EMU matchup - E Michigan has won 1 game in the last 3 yrs by more than 5 pts (W Mich in 2007) other than Ind St and Howard, of course they were only favorites a couple times (short dogs in most though), then again Army lost most of their OL and LT weighs in at 248 and they have a 6'10 283 lb WR, key obviously is EMU defending the run since Army can do little else, not their best area last couple years
look forward to checking out final picks - BOL
Thanks for insight, I don't really have that pick graded that highly, just realized that its up so high must have not finished it. Oh well I meant for that game to be around the bottom of the pack. Yeah I see what your saying EMU stops the run they can cover seems pretty simple. I'm still checking out a few things with this game anyways. I really only feel good about 6 games thus far. My final plays probably won't be until Wednesday maybe Thursday the week of. A lot more time for me to get ready for the season. Bigger texted games are what I would play right now. Moved WMU down just a tad as well.
Arizona -13 /-17 Penn State -27 /-32.5 Notre Dame -14 / -15.5 Kentucky -14/-17 Western Michigan +12 /+10.5 or more Florida State -5.5 /-7 Oklahoma State -5.5/ -6.5 Clemson -19.5 /-20.5 Oklahoma -21.5/-23 Washington +16solid Eastern Michigan -5 Missouri +6.5 or better Rutgers
-5.5 or less is another lean. I'm really starting to like Rutgers more
and more. I think they are the best team in the Big East. Totals in order as well. Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58
Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Notre Dame/Nevada over 61.5/63
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
not encouraging or discouraging any play whodey, just some thoughts on the Army-EMU matchup - E Michigan has won 1 game in the last 3 yrs by more than 5 pts (W Mich in 2007) other than Ind St and Howard, of course they were only favorites a couple times (short dogs in most though), then again Army lost most of their OL and LT weighs in at 248 and they have a 6'10 283 lb WR, key obviously is EMU defending the run since Army can do little else, not their best area last couple years
look forward to checking out final picks - BOL
Thanks for insight, I don't really have that pick graded that highly, just realized that its up so high must have not finished it. Oh well I meant for that game to be around the bottom of the pack. Yeah I see what your saying EMU stops the run they can cover seems pretty simple. I'm still checking out a few things with this game anyways. I really only feel good about 6 games thus far. My final plays probably won't be until Wednesday maybe Thursday the week of. A lot more time for me to get ready for the season. Bigger texted games are what I would play right now. Moved WMU down just a tad as well.
Arizona -13 /-17 Penn State -27 /-32.5 Notre Dame -14 / -15.5 Kentucky -14/-17 Western Michigan +12 /+10.5 or more Florida State -5.5 /-7 Oklahoma State -5.5/ -6.5 Clemson -19.5 /-20.5 Oklahoma -21.5/-23 Washington +16solid Eastern Michigan -5 Missouri +6.5 or better Rutgers
-5.5 or less is another lean. I'm really starting to like Rutgers more
and more. I think they are the best team in the Big East. Totals in order as well. Stanford/Washington State Under 56 /53 Illinois/Missouri Under 60/58
Buffalo/UTEP under 60.5/57.5 Notre Dame/Nevada over 61.5/63
sounds like some good ones, what happened to Toledo +12, guess it got dropped - had thought about that one went with the under instead though, could see Toledo hanging most of the way similar to Michigan game last year
only opposite on WMU and UW - after watching rerun on Wash-Hawaii from 2007 I could see UW being pretty good in that one..unfortunately since I'm on LSU
0
sounds like some good ones, what happened to Toledo +12, guess it got dropped - had thought about that one went with the under instead though, could see Toledo hanging most of the way similar to Michigan game last year
only opposite on WMU and UW - after watching rerun on Wash-Hawaii from 2007 I could see UW being pretty good in that one..unfortunately since I'm on LSU
sounds like some good ones, what happened to Toledo +12, guess it got dropped - had thought about that one went with the under instead though, could see Toledo hanging most of the way similar to Michigan game last year
only opposite on WMU and UW - after watching rerun on Wash-Hawaii from 2007 I could see UW being pretty good in that one..unfortunately since I'm on LSU
Yeah I dumped Toledo, couple factors weighed into it. I just don't like the matchup personally. UW could be the most improved team in the country this season. They have some talent and a quarterback who can do a lot of things. I still think with LSU having to come into there with a very young inexperienced QB they might struggle. 14 STRAIGHT LOSSES for UW Gotta be itchin for a win, don't think they will win, but honestly think they have a shot. As long as Locker doesn't turn the ball over and can consistently move the ball giving defense time to rest this game should be close. I don't think LSU will be able to score all the points everyone thinks they will either. I saw a 69-7 predicted score and laughed for about 10 minutes.
0
Quote Originally Posted by nostradamus12:
sounds like some good ones, what happened to Toledo +12, guess it got dropped - had thought about that one went with the under instead though, could see Toledo hanging most of the way similar to Michigan game last year
only opposite on WMU and UW - after watching rerun on Wash-Hawaii from 2007 I could see UW being pretty good in that one..unfortunately since I'm on LSU
Yeah I dumped Toledo, couple factors weighed into it. I just don't like the matchup personally. UW could be the most improved team in the country this season. They have some talent and a quarterback who can do a lot of things. I still think with LSU having to come into there with a very young inexperienced QB they might struggle. 14 STRAIGHT LOSSES for UW Gotta be itchin for a win, don't think they will win, but honestly think they have a shot. As long as Locker doesn't turn the ball over and can consistently move the ball giving defense time to rest this game should be close. I don't think LSU will be able to score all the points everyone thinks they will either. I saw a 69-7 predicted score and laughed for about 10 minutes.
Another thing Nos is I think Purdue is better off with this new QB that they have. Also in home openers in West Lafayette Purdue is 11-1. Their offensive line should be fairly good this season. Concern is that they only have a few returning starters, but is that necessarily a bad thing...they were pretty bad last season. Although they did play Iowa/Penn State fairly tough.
0
Another thing Nos is I think Purdue is better off with this new QB that they have. Also in home openers in West Lafayette Purdue is 11-1. Their offensive line should be fairly good this season. Concern is that they only have a few returning starters, but is that necessarily a bad thing...they were pretty bad last season. Although they did play Iowa/Penn State fairly tough.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.