Posted by DrStrangelove Tulane +17 ......Oregon -21 ..... Army +7 (winner covered navy game) ... {TODAY 12-17-25 U La La/Delaware over 59.5} (my number is 66) ......... BEST OF LUCK
goldfinger 1964
Posted by DrStrangelove Tulane +17 ......Oregon -21 ..... Army +7 (winner covered navy game) ... {TODAY 12-17-25 U La La/Delaware over 59.5} (my number is 66) ......... BEST OF LUCK
[Posted by DrStrangelove Tulane +17 ......Oregon -21 ..... Army +7 (win ) ... (12-17-25) U La La/Delaware over 59.5 (loss) ... #27 i passed as well... good luck dr
goldfinger 1964
[Posted by DrStrangelove Tulane +17 ......Oregon -21 ..... Army +7 (win ) ... (12-17-25) U La La/Delaware over 59.5 (loss) ... #27 i passed as well... good luck dr
I see there’s three running dogs today. Miami, AZ St and Michigan. Good luck today
Yes, I've already bet most of my running dogs at the start of bowl season. The Running Dogs are having another great bowl season going 12-6 so far. Today the running dogs are Michigan, which I still like a lot since I originally played them at +5.5 and are now up to 6. ASU is my other dog. I got them at +1.5 on the opening line, but are now up to +3 because of opt outs. So I would be careful with this one. But I do like the under in that game. I got it early at 49.5. Miami isn't a running dog. That early Miami play I listed was against Texas A&M, which they covered. No strong opinion on Miami/tOSU. If I play anything, I might play Miami 1H. But nothing big. If anybody wants to see the running dog list, it's in post #16 of this thread. Good luck!
Quote Originally Posted by boro33:
I see there’s three running dogs today. Miami, AZ St and Michigan. Good luck today
Yes, I've already bet most of my running dogs at the start of bowl season. The Running Dogs are having another great bowl season going 12-6 so far. Today the running dogs are Michigan, which I still like a lot since I originally played them at +5.5 and are now up to 6. ASU is my other dog. I got them at +1.5 on the opening line, but are now up to +3 because of opt outs. So I would be careful with this one. But I do like the under in that game. I got it early at 49.5. Miami isn't a running dog. That early Miami play I listed was against Texas A&M, which they covered. No strong opinion on Miami/tOSU. If I play anything, I might play Miami 1H. But nothing big. If anybody wants to see the running dog list, it's in post #16 of this thread. Good luck!
ya i didn't read #34 before my post... very odd for me not to ck in as i really like your running dogs system
Navy was originally a running dog (+1) before being made the favorite. So they will most likely be a win. The last two running dogs are SMU and Wake. So many opt outs that it's a crapshoot with these two games. But I liked SMU better when I took them at +3. My original play on Zona was also a +3 on the opening line. Win or lose, it's still been a much better bowl season for the running dogs than I thought it would be with all of the opt out nonsense. Much better than they did in the regular season. FYI this is the first season in 20 years that the running dogs have had a losing regular season record. That's a pretty good run. I just hope it's not the 'new norm'.
Quote Originally Posted by PUSSYGALORE333:
ya i didn't read #34 before my post... very odd for me not to ck in as i really like your running dogs system
Navy was originally a running dog (+1) before being made the favorite. So they will most likely be a win. The last two running dogs are SMU and Wake. So many opt outs that it's a crapshoot with these two games. But I liked SMU better when I took them at +3. My original play on Zona was also a +3 on the opening line. Win or lose, it's still been a much better bowl season for the running dogs than I thought it would be with all of the opt out nonsense. Much better than they did in the regular season. FYI this is the first season in 20 years that the running dogs have had a losing regular season record. That's a pretty good run. I just hope it's not the 'new norm'.
List of bowl running dogs: (19-Year Total: 145-92 (61.18%) OU Miami JMU (P4 vs G5) Tulane (P4 vs G5) Jax St Memphis (P4 vs G5) Wazzu Toledo (P4 vs G5) Southern Miss Ohio Hawaii (P4 vs G5) New Mexico (P4 vs G5) Miami, Ohio LSU Missouri St Penn St SDSU App St ASU Michigan Navy (P4 vs G5) ...Navy now favored Wake Forest SMU
The Running Dogs had a good bowl season (better than I expected!) going 14-9. Even the G5 vs P4's were 5-2.
There are no running dogs in the two semi-final games. The Ducks/Hoosiers Run Numbers, defensive numbers and offensive numbers are almost dead even …. I have Oregon +2.26 vs IU’s +2.36 in Run Numbers … I have Ducks with a 1.5 yard edge in YPG D, but IU with a 3 point edge in PPG D … Hoosiers are 3 yards and 3 points better than Ducks in YPG & PPG offense. On paper this is a close one.
Miami’s run numbers and defensive numbers are significantly better than Ole Miss’ … Rebs have the edge on offense … +5 YPG and +6 PPG
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:
List of bowl running dogs: (19-Year Total: 145-92 (61.18%) OU Miami JMU (P4 vs G5) Tulane (P4 vs G5) Jax St Memphis (P4 vs G5) Wazzu Toledo (P4 vs G5) Southern Miss Ohio Hawaii (P4 vs G5) New Mexico (P4 vs G5) Miami, Ohio LSU Missouri St Penn St SDSU App St ASU Michigan Navy (P4 vs G5) ...Navy now favored Wake Forest SMU
The Running Dogs had a good bowl season (better than I expected!) going 14-9. Even the G5 vs P4's were 5-2.
There are no running dogs in the two semi-final games. The Ducks/Hoosiers Run Numbers, defensive numbers and offensive numbers are almost dead even …. I have Oregon +2.26 vs IU’s +2.36 in Run Numbers … I have Ducks with a 1.5 yard edge in YPG D, but IU with a 3 point edge in PPG D … Hoosiers are 3 yards and 3 points better than Ducks in YPG & PPG offense. On paper this is a close one.
Miami’s run numbers and defensive numbers are significantly better than Ole Miss’ … Rebs have the edge on offense … +5 YPG and +6 PPG
You guys know how I like the better run teams combined with better defense. So this is a no brainer for me. But Chambliss is the wildcard here. He is an amazing player, but something tells me Miami is going to get to him much better than Georgia did....GL
Miami -3
You guys know how I like the better run teams combined with better defense. So this is a no brainer for me. But Chambliss is the wildcard here. He is an amazing player, but something tells me Miami is going to get to him much better than Georgia did....GL
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
