I want to get the Green Men before this line drops any further. They are the running dogs with (statistically) the better D in this spot. JMU is also the running dogs with the better D. But I haven't done anything yet. Just have to keep in mind that these are G5 vs P4 teams. I'm tempted to play Miami, but I may wait. They are also the running dogs with the better D, which is usually a green light for me. But something about this game makes me a little uneasy. Oh, I know what it is, Cristobol vs Elko.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Tulane +17
I want to get the Green Men before this line drops any further. They are the running dogs with (statistically) the better D in this spot. JMU is also the running dogs with the better D. But I haven't done anything yet. Just have to keep in mind that these are G5 vs P4 teams. I'm tempted to play Miami, but I may wait. They are also the running dogs with the better D, which is usually a green light for me. But something about this game makes me a little uneasy. Oh, I know what it is, Cristobol vs Elko.
A&M’s has not been favorites a bunch of times against ranked teams. When they are it’s Mizzu and LSU (recent LSU not the outstanding LSU teams) Elko looks better because of the schedule. Thats my thought anyways.
I already made my pick on Tulane no need to comment but let’s get it !
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
1
A&M’s has not been favorites a bunch of times against ranked teams. When they are it’s Mizzu and LSU (recent LSU not the outstanding LSU teams) Elko looks better because of the schedule. Thats my thought anyways.
I already made my pick on Tulane no need to comment but let’s get it !
A&M’s has not been favorites a bunch of times against ranked teams. When they are it’s Mizzu and LSU (recent LSU not the outstanding LSU teams) Elko looks better because of the schedule. Thats my thought anyways. I already made my pick on Tulane no need to comment but let’s get it !
Could be, I haven't dug into the game yet. I know I like Miami a lot better as dogs. They do a good job of shittting the bed when they are the faves in big games (Louisville, SMU).
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
A&M’s has not been favorites a bunch of times against ranked teams. When they are it’s Mizzu and LSU (recent LSU not the outstanding LSU teams) Elko looks better because of the schedule. Thats my thought anyways. I already made my pick on Tulane no need to comment but let’s get it !
Could be, I haven't dug into the game yet. I know I like Miami a lot better as dogs. They do a good job of shittting the bed when they are the faves in big games (Louisville, SMU).
Well Miami isn’t my best game of the week but the line at 4 or closer to zero with a playoff team that just lost for the first time is not Giving A&M a lot of credit. That doesn’t mean I’m right. Last years bracket was harsh on me, I could only find one or two successful opportunities. It appears to me this season might be more fruitful. We’ll see.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
1
Well Miami isn’t my best game of the week but the line at 4 or closer to zero with a playoff team that just lost for the first time is not Giving A&M a lot of credit. That doesn’t mean I’m right. Last years bracket was harsh on me, I could only find one or two successful opportunities. It appears to me this season might be more fruitful. We’ll see.
Unless you can physically push around the Ducks on the line of scrimmage (like Indiana did) you're going to be in for a long day against their speed. Especially if it's on a fast track. I don't see JM having the horses to keep up.
0
Oregon -21
Unless you can physically push around the Ducks on the line of scrimmage (like Indiana did) you're going to be in for a long day against their speed. Especially if it's on a fast track. I don't see JM having the horses to keep up.
I agree with the potency of the offense, I just don't think Lanning will want to blow them out by 3 plus scores. Texas Tech will have a while to study Oregon and has the bye edge. Will the Ducks go nuts on a well balanced JM team that still beat Washington St by 4, also knowing that's with Alonzo Barnett going 50% on pass completion?
0
@DrStrangelove
I agree with the potency of the offense, I just don't think Lanning will want to blow them out by 3 plus scores. Texas Tech will have a while to study Oregon and has the bye edge. Will the Ducks go nuts on a well balanced JM team that still beat Washington St by 4, also knowing that's with Alonzo Barnett going 50% on pass completion?
Oregon -21 Unless you can physically push around the Ducks on the line of scrimmage (like Indiana did) you're going to be in for a long day against their speed. Especially if it's on a fast track. I don't see JM having the horses to keep up.
it's a home game for the ducks. so i'm giving them a slightly better than regular chance for this win and taking care of business for bettors
Nuthin but a g thang baby
0
Quote Originally Posted by DrStrangelove:
Oregon -21 Unless you can physically push around the Ducks on the line of scrimmage (like Indiana did) you're going to be in for a long day against their speed. Especially if it's on a fast track. I don't see JM having the horses to keep up.
it's a home game for the ducks. so i'm giving them a slightly better than regular chance for this win and taking care of business for bettors
@DrStrangelove I agree with the potency of the offense, I just don't think Lanning will want to blow them out by 3 plus scores. Texas Tech will have a while to study Oregon and has the bye edge. Will the Ducks go nuts on a well balanced JM team that still beat Washington St by 4, also knowing that's with Alonzo Barnett going 50% on pass completion?
JMU is a balanced team, but against some very weak competition. They lost by 14 to the only P4 school they played. A mediocre Louisville team. And now they have to travel all the way across the country to Autzen and to try to hang with Oregon. The Ducks running numbers are very good too. And against WAY better competition. Lanning has always been a take no prisoners coach. Just look at some of his Big 10 games earlier this season. Plus, last year they lost their first round playoff game to eventual national champion tOSU. Lanning won't hold back here. GL
0
Quote Originally Posted by Daran.T:
@DrStrangelove I agree with the potency of the offense, I just don't think Lanning will want to blow them out by 3 plus scores. Texas Tech will have a while to study Oregon and has the bye edge. Will the Ducks go nuts on a well balanced JM team that still beat Washington St by 4, also knowing that's with Alonzo Barnett going 50% on pass completion?
JMU is a balanced team, but against some very weak competition. They lost by 14 to the only P4 school they played. A mediocre Louisville team. And now they have to travel all the way across the country to Autzen and to try to hang with Oregon. The Ducks running numbers are very good too. And against WAY better competition. Lanning has always been a take no prisoners coach. Just look at some of his Big 10 games earlier this season. Plus, last year they lost their first round playoff game to eventual national champion tOSU. Lanning won't hold back here. GL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
