| California | -9.5 | |
| EastCarolina | -7 | |
| MichiganSt | -11 | |
| Missouri | -20.5 | |
| Oklahoma | -14.5 | |
| Oregon | -2.5 | |
| PennSt | -22 | |
| Illinois | -19 | |
| ArizonaSt | -17 | |
| California | -9.5 | |
| EastCarolina | -7 | |
| MichiganSt | -11 | |
| Missouri | -20.5 | |
| Oklahoma | -14.5 | |
| Oregon | -2.5 | |
| PennSt | -22 | |
| Illinois | -19 | |
| ArizonaSt | -17 | |
CMich (-2.5): if you follow CMich or MAC football you know that last year was a tale of 2 seasons for CMich...
throw out the Army and ND St games, because they are non-conf games against non-conf BCS schools... what you have left is 8 games against MAC teams, and 3 road games against BCS conf schools (i'm not counting the Bowl game, for many reasons, including the fact that it was a rematch of an earlier game in the season)...
against the MAC... CMich was 7-1 SU, 5-1-2 ATS, and scored at least 34 points in every single game...
against Kansas, Purdue and Clemson... CMich was 0-3 SU, 0-3 ATS, and lost by an average score of 56-24...
to take it further... against the MAC, there were 6 games (incredibly) where the line was CMich (-3)... 6 of 8 games fell with the exact same line... CMich was 6-0 SU, winning by at least 3 points in all 6 games (i.e., would have covered my -2.5 spread all 6 times)...
just seems like Groundhog Day to me...
on top of that, i think the starting QB for Ohio isn't gonna play... didn't play most of the OSU game because he got knocked out with a shoulder injury... if he does play i assume he won't be 100%...
34-20
CMich (-2.5): if you follow CMich or MAC football you know that last year was a tale of 2 seasons for CMich...
throw out the Army and ND St games, because they are non-conf games against non-conf BCS schools... what you have left is 8 games against MAC teams, and 3 road games against BCS conf schools (i'm not counting the Bowl game, for many reasons, including the fact that it was a rematch of an earlier game in the season)...
against the MAC... CMich was 7-1 SU, 5-1-2 ATS, and scored at least 34 points in every single game...
against Kansas, Purdue and Clemson... CMich was 0-3 SU, 0-3 ATS, and lost by an average score of 56-24...
to take it further... against the MAC, there were 6 games (incredibly) where the line was CMich (-3)... 6 of 8 games fell with the exact same line... CMich was 6-0 SU, winning by at least 3 points in all 6 games (i.e., would have covered my -2.5 spread all 6 times)...
just seems like Groundhog Day to me...
on top of that, i think the starting QB for Ohio isn't gonna play... didn't play most of the OSU game because he got knocked out with a shoulder injury... if he does play i assume he won't be 100%...
34-20
Great writeup very informative and great streak!
Yet thats alot of chalk for your next picks.
BOL
Yet, your accurate gauge is what everybody and their mother is gauging to lay their cash on USC. Indeed thats not the main reason your taking USC yet, this is the main reason im one of the few thats gonna go ahead and take value when it is given which is rare due to overreaction of ohio's average showing last week.
Although it was average this is the way i saw in contrast to your view. The moment i watched the second half. Tressel obviously circled USC as the must team to beat. So its obvious to say it was a look ahead game last week. Ok...they arent playing their full potential but this is getting scary...upset alert! This played perfectly in Tressels hand. What more would you want as a coach than your QB to come back and win the game proving hes a gamer? Or a 40-0 blow out with your QB sitting out the 4th quarter? Tressel, " sonava bitch pulled it off ". Lets carry that to next weeks game.
The way i see it. Whether it was by Coaching design or not Boeckman proved he can win while down. Mark sanchez on the other hand indeed do well vs virginia but....lets not get carried away here. Sanchez was average last year. The rick fox of football im not sold on yet due to one great performance. This game will be his biggest test.
Sucker bet indeed based off line movements. Yet a tested boeckman and returning beenie at +10 im gonna take value on a talented team tried and tested ready to play come saturday. ![]()
Great writeup very informative and great streak!
Yet thats alot of chalk for your next picks.
BOL
Yet, your accurate gauge is what everybody and their mother is gauging to lay their cash on USC. Indeed thats not the main reason your taking USC yet, this is the main reason im one of the few thats gonna go ahead and take value when it is given which is rare due to overreaction of ohio's average showing last week.
Although it was average this is the way i saw in contrast to your view. The moment i watched the second half. Tressel obviously circled USC as the must team to beat. So its obvious to say it was a look ahead game last week. Ok...they arent playing their full potential but this is getting scary...upset alert! This played perfectly in Tressels hand. What more would you want as a coach than your QB to come back and win the game proving hes a gamer? Or a 40-0 blow out with your QB sitting out the 4th quarter? Tressel, " sonava bitch pulled it off ". Lets carry that to next weeks game.
The way i see it. Whether it was by Coaching design or not Boeckman proved he can win while down. Mark sanchez on the other hand indeed do well vs virginia but....lets not get carried away here. Sanchez was average last year. The rick fox of football im not sold on yet due to one great performance. This game will be his biggest test.
Sucker bet indeed based off line movements. Yet a tested boeckman and returning beenie at +10 im gonna take value on a talented team tried and tested ready to play come saturday. ![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.