Posted:
#26
As I predicted earlier....... Washington easy!!
0
Colorado Washington Write up
Posted:
#28
Wow, I bet you guys are wondering how i was so accurate in my description. The difference in the game was that Washington didnt allow Colorado to run, and their all conference lineman would have no problem running on Colorado. Washington's offensive line had 3 all PAC 12 lineman and handled Colorado easily...
0
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by jimmymo:
There are a lot of Sunday a.m. bettors here....This is exactly the rationale that makes me feel good about my Washington bet......and do not take that the wrong way, because I do not believe your thoughts are unreasonable.......just not in this spot......there are a lot of variables at work, including the huge P12 payoff if the UW gets into the playoff...among others that relate to the match-up......
Nice work dawgs.
0
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:
Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.
I took the Huskies -7 & under 58.....
Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.
I took the Huskies
-7 & under 58..... 0
Hot Forum Topics
