• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    Colorado Washington Write up

    12 Next Last»
    alopez14325
    THEMUGG
    Thaistix
    MaxMillion1980
    Damaged99
    ...
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 4135
    Posts: 32
    12 Next Last»
     
    alopez14325
    alopez14325
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 1182
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 5:43 AM ET #1

    When you look at this game, you quickly see that these team's are very similar. the number one defense in the Pac 12 is playing the number 2 defense in the Pac 12.  Washington has an extremely talented WR corps, and the Pac 12 offensive player of the year at QB... However they will face their toughest match up of the season when they face a Colorado team that has very talented DB's, which allows their coordinator to send pressure, or stack the box. Colorado has blitzed more than any other team in the Pac 12, but Browning is completing 63% of his passes when blitzed. 

    Colorado's defense has been able to create turnovers all season, and turned Utah over 4 times a week ago.  There's no doubt that whoever wins the turnover margin will have a good chance of winning this game.  Unfortunately for Colorado, Washington has a QB who is very good at recognizing defenses, and as a result,not turn the ball over.  I think it's important to remember that neither Utah, or Washington State had trouble moving the ball against Colorado, Utah had the ball inside the 10 yard line 4 times, and came away with two FG's. Both teams are ending the season with impressive back to back wins, but Colorado was also at home vs Utah and Washington State, this game will be played on a neutral field. 

    I have a ton of respect for Colorado's secondary, but Washington has a very balanced offense, I think it will be Washington;s ability to run the football with Gaskins and Coleman that will lead to big plays down field.  Washington will be getting back a serious offensive weapon in Chico McCallister, this means that Colorado will have to deal with two Wr's that run 4.2-4.3 40's... I expect all of that speed will lead to some big plays, as well as a soft cushion for Browning to throw the underneath routes.

    Ultimately I think the reason Washington will win, is because of Washington;s massive run stuffing defensive line.  Colorado only average 2.8 yards a carry vs Utah at home last week, so I do not expect Lindsay to be able to run like he has throughout the season. If Colorado doesnt get turnover's they arent a team that's going to score a ton of points.  I think Washington defense is built perfectly to stop the Colorado offense.  Colorado was held to 10 points vs Stanford, 20 points vs UCLA, and 17 vs USC, even Utah held them to 27, which isint bad considering they had 4 turnovers, and Colorado was at home.  

    My biggest concern with Washington is that they're playing for a chance to get in the college football playoffs.  This could be viewed as a positive, or extra motivation, but motivation usually isint an issue in a championship game. I look at Washington playing for a playoff spot as a lot of pressure. Pressure that Colorado doesnt have, nobody expected Colorado to have this kind of season, so they can play more relaxed if that makes sense.  They have a very experienced Senior QB who has started over 40 college games.  That experience should help his recognize some of Washington;s more exotic coverages.  If Colorado win;s it will be because Liufau shows more poise than Browning.  If Colorado's blitz gets to Browning and he starts to second guess himself, Colorado's defense could rattle the young Washington team and get some of the turnovers they will need. 

    It's worth noting Washington has lost three defensive starters in the last month, including their leading tackler.  

    I am buying the pt and going backing Washington -6.5...

    Also Considering teasing WMU -9.5 and Wash pk 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    When you look at this game, you quickly see that these team's are very similar. the number one defense in the Pac 12 is playing the number 2 defense in the Pac 12.  Washington has an extremely talented WR corps, and the Pac 12 offensive player of the year at QB... However they will face their toughest match up of the season when they face a Colorado team that has very talented DB's, which allows their coordinator to send pressure, or stack the box. Colorado has blitzed more than any other team in the Pac 12, but Browning is completing 63% of his passes when blitzed. 

    Colorado's defense has been able to create turnovers all season, and turned Utah over 4 times a week ago.  There's no doubt that whoever wins the turnover margin will have a good chance of winning this game.  Unfortunately for Colorado, Washington has a QB who is very good at recognizing defenses, and as a result,not turn the ball over.  I think it's important to remember that neither Utah, or Washington State had trouble moving the ball against Colorado, Utah had the ball inside the 10 yard line 4 times, and came away with two FG's. Both teams are ending the season with impressive back to back wins, but Colorado was also at home vs Utah and Washington State, this game will be played on a neutral field. 

    I have a ton of respect for Colorado's secondary, but Washington has a very balanced offense, I think it will be Washington;s ability to run the football with Gaskins and Coleman that will lead to big plays down field.  Washington will be getting back a serious offensive weapon in Chico McCallister, this means that Colorado will have to deal with two Wr's that run 4.2-4.3 40's... I expect all of that speed will lead to some big plays, as well as a soft cushion for Browning to throw the underneath routes.

    Ultimately I think the reason Washington will win, is because of Washington;s massive run stuffing defensive line.  Colorado only average 2.8 yards a carry vs Utah at home last week, so I do not expect Lindsay to be able to run like he has throughout the season. If Colorado doesnt get turnover's they arent a team that's going to score a ton of points.  I think Washington defense is built perfectly to stop the Colorado offense.  Colorado was held to 10 points vs Stanford, 20 points vs UCLA, and 17 vs USC, even Utah held them to 27, which isint bad considering they had 4 turnovers, and Colorado was at home.  

    My biggest concern with Washington is that they're playing for a chance to get in the college football playoffs.  This could be viewed as a positive, or extra motivation, but motivation usually isint an issue in a championship game. I look at Washington playing for a playoff spot as a lot of pressure. Pressure that Colorado doesnt have, nobody expected Colorado to have this kind of season, so they can play more relaxed if that makes sense.  They have a very experienced Senior QB who has started over 40 college games.  That experience should help his recognize some of Washington;s more exotic coverages.  If Colorado win;s it will be because Liufau shows more poise than Browning.  If Colorado's blitz gets to Browning and he starts to second guess himself, Colorado's defense could rattle the young Washington team and get some of the turnovers they will need. 

    It's worth noting Washington has lost three defensive starters in the last month, including their leading tackler.  

    I am buying the pt and going backing Washington -6.5...

    Also Considering teasing WMU -9.5 and Wash pk 
     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38231
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 7:46 AM ET #2

     Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.

     I took the Huskies -7 & under 58.....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.

     I took the Huskies -7 & under 58.....
     
    Thaistix
    Thaistix
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 1508
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 8:34 AM ET #3

    Nice write up. You nailed it about pressure. Can Browning handle the pressure against decent defense. Will see. BOL
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice write up. You nailed it about pressure. Can Browning handle the pressure against decent defense. Will see. BOL
     
    MaxMillion1980
    MaxMillion1980
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2016
    Posts: 645
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 9:43 AM ET #4

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     
    Damaged99
    Damaged99
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 1254
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 10:08 AM ET #5

    Quote Originally Posted by Thaistix:

    Nice write up. You nailed it about pressure. Can Browning handle the pressure against decent defense. Will see. BOL

    He couldn't against USC and I think Colorado is a similar team they play physical defense. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Thaistix:

    Nice write up. You nailed it about pressure. Can Browning handle the pressure against decent defense. Will see. BOL

    He couldn't against USC and I think Colorado is a similar team they play physical defense. 
     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38231
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 12:47 PM ET #6

     Washington
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     Washington
     
    TopHog
    TopHog
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 2667
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 12:50 PM ET #7

    Quote Originally Posted by alopez14325:

     Washington will be getting back a serious offensive weapon in Chico McCallister, this means that Colorado will have to deal with two Wr's that run 4.2-4.3 40's... I expect all of that speed will lead to some big plays, as well as a soft cushion for Browning to throw the underneath routes.


    Washington doesn't have ANY WR that runs a 4.2 or a 4.3
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by alopez14325:

     Washington will be getting back a serious offensive weapon in Chico McCallister, this means that Colorado will have to deal with two Wr's that run 4.2-4.3 40's... I expect all of that speed will lead to some big plays, as well as a soft cushion for Browning to throw the underneath routes.


    Washington doesn't have ANY WR that runs a 4.2 or a 4.3
     
    Zoot
    Zoot
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2003
    Posts: 20658
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 12:51 PM ET #8

    Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

     Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.

     I took the Huskies -7 & under 58.....

    Mugg, alwasy respect your opinion
    though im not so sure re: who has the better defensive backfield. The Money Gang,” CU's defensive backfield with Tedric Thompson have been pretty damn good
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

     Good write up. Between Ross, Pettis, & McClatcher (played vs Wazzu) the Huskies have three speedsters @ WR........& they probably have the better defensive backfield. Containing Liufau will be the key on D........make him throw, not run. The Buffs lose a little more edge not being at home (sea level) than do the Huskies but I don't think it plays a major factor.

     I took the Huskies -7 & under 58.....

    Mugg, alwasy respect your opinion
    though im not so sure re: who has the better defensive backfield. The Money Gang,” CU's defensive backfield with Tedric Thompson have been pretty damn good
     
    SPark1
    SPark1
    All-Star
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 10769
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 1:29 PM ET #9

    Nice write up but missed the show. Can't buy down from 8.5
    It's all probabilities
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice write up but missed the show. Can't buy down from 8.5
     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38231
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 1:35 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:


    Washington doesn't have ANY WR that runs a 4.2 or a 4.3
    John Ross ran a 4.24.......Pettis ran a 4.35......not sure what McClatcher runs.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by TopHog:


    Washington doesn't have ANY WR that runs a 4.2 or a 4.3
    John Ross ran a 4.24.......Pettis ran a 4.35......not sure what McClatcher runs.
     
    THEMUGG
    THEMUGG
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 38231
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 1:41 PM ET #11

    Quote Originally Posted by Zoot:


    Mugg, alwasy respect your opinion
    though im not so sure re: who has the better defensive backfield. The Money Gang,” CU's defensive backfield with Tedric Thompson have been pretty damn good
    King will be a 1st rounder if he comes out this year.......Beaver is a 3rd or better......Baker a 3rd or better.......Jones & McIntosh are studs.......they're loaded. But OK, it's safe to call it a wash.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Zoot:


    Mugg, alwasy respect your opinion
    though im not so sure re: who has the better defensive backfield. The Money Gang,” CU's defensive backfield with Tedric Thompson have been pretty damn good
    King will be a 1st rounder if he comes out this year.......Beaver is a 3rd or better......Baker a 3rd or better.......Jones & McIntosh are studs.......they're loaded. But OK, it's safe to call it a wash.
     
    Urbanwildlife
    Urbanwildlife
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2013
    Posts: 5611
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 1:42 PM ET #12

    Excellent work as always my friend!

    See ya at the pay window!
    SNITCHES end up being bitches, or end up with stitches, and in ditches! #REALITY
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Excellent work as always my friend!

    See ya at the pay window!
     
    1969USC
    1969USC
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2009
    Posts: 1628
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 2:26 PM ET #13

    Washington will win. 
    Their QB had a bad game vs USC and missed wide open receivers down field.  That won't happen again. 
    Colorado got spanked by Michigan.  They were lucky to beat Utah at home.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Washington will win. 
    Their QB had a bad game vs USC and missed wide open receivers down field.  That won't happen again. 
    Colorado got spanked by Michigan.  They were lucky to beat Utah at home.
     
    Damaged99
    Damaged99
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 1254
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 2:40 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by 1969USC:

    Washington will win. 
    Their QB had a bad game vs USC and missed wide open receivers down field.  That won't happen again. 
    Colorado got spanked by Michigan.  They were lucky to beat Utah at home.

    IDK man I watched that USC game and Washington was dominated on both sides of the ball.

     Colorado also had Washington on deck for the pack 12 championship on deck against Utah. 

    And I wouldnt say they got spanked by Michigan at all. They were winning at the half until Sefo Liufau was knocked out of the game...

    Wrong team may be favored here....
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by 1969USC:

    Washington will win. 
    Their QB had a bad game vs USC and missed wide open receivers down field.  That won't happen again. 
    Colorado got spanked by Michigan.  They were lucky to beat Utah at home.

    IDK man I watched that USC game and Washington was dominated on both sides of the ball.

     Colorado also had Washington on deck for the pack 12 championship on deck against Utah. 

    And I wouldnt say they got spanked by Michigan at all. They were winning at the half until Sefo Liufau was knocked out of the game...

    Wrong team may be favored here....
     
    Sinatra
    Sinatra
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 74
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 3:34 PM ET #15

    My line is so different. My book has it at -8.5 and o/u 55.5
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My line is so different. My book has it at -8.5 and o/u 55.5
     
    Sinatra
    Sinatra
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2012
    Posts: 74
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 3:35 PM ET #16

    Is that extra point the deciding factor though?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Is that extra point the deciding factor though?
     
    sunnny
    sunnny
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2013
    Posts: 2734
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 4:36 PM ET #17

    Could I make a case for a Colorado team that's 10-2 ATS this season and on an 8-2-1 ATS roll catching points? Absolutely, but I won't.

    Four of the five previous Pac-12 title games have been decided by at least 18 points and all five of them were won by the North division winner (Stanford thrice, Oregon twice).

    Why buck the trends tonight at the 49ers' Levi Stadium in Santa Clara, California?

    Sure, Washington will be playing its first game on grass this season, but the Huskies are not Oregon in its prime; this is not a team built on speed. Instead, this is a balanced offensive squad led by underrated quarterback Jake Browning (40 TDs, 7 INTs) that averages 44.8 points per game.

    The Huskies certainly didn't impress me in their road opener earlier in the season when they barely escaped Tucson with a 35-28 win over a lousy Arizona squad, but they certainly got their act together by the time they stopped Utah, 31-24, in Salt Lake last month.

    Did they lay an egg at home against Southern Cal a few weeks ago? Absolutely. But they recovered nicely with blowout wins against Arizona State at home and Washington State on the road to rebuild confidence and recapture momentum.

    Colorado is good. And its defense is on par with Washington's. Offensively, the Buffs are equally as balanced with their quarterback, Sefo Liufau (11 TDs and 2,150 yards passing; 7 TDs and 481 yards rushing) more of a dual threat than U-Dub's Browning. And Liufau's got a strong ground game as well with Phillip Lindsay (1,136 yards, 5.4 ypc) leading the charge for an attack with a 34.8 point per game output.

    These teams are about equal defensively and both feature outstanding secondaries. But, at the end of the day, I can't throw my support behind a Colorado team that struggled in a 10-5 win at Stanford, barely beat an injury-riddled UCLA squad 20-10 at home and just slipped by a dejected Utah team 27-22 in its home finale last weekend. 

    Truth be told, I think Southern Cal - who also beat the Buffs earlier this year - would have been the better match-up here, but unfortunately the Trojans fell short of the title game.

    The public is siding with Washington and I'll back the Huskies as well.

     


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Could I make a case for a Colorado team that's 10-2 ATS this season and on an 8-2-1 ATS roll catching points? Absolutely, but I won't.

    Four of the five previous Pac-12 title games have been decided by at least 18 points and all five of them were won by the North division winner (Stanford thrice, Oregon twice).

    Why buck the trends tonight at the 49ers' Levi Stadium in Santa Clara, California?

    Sure, Washington will be playing its first game on grass this season, but the Huskies are not Oregon in its prime; this is not a team built on speed. Instead, this is a balanced offensive squad led by underrated quarterback Jake Browning (40 TDs, 7 INTs) that averages 44.8 points per game.

    The Huskies certainly didn't impress me in their road opener earlier in the season when they barely escaped Tucson with a 35-28 win over a lousy Arizona squad, but they certainly got their act together by the time they stopped Utah, 31-24, in Salt Lake last month.

    Did they lay an egg at home against Southern Cal a few weeks ago? Absolutely. But they recovered nicely with blowout wins against Arizona State at home and Washington State on the road to rebuild confidence and recapture momentum.

    Colorado is good. And its defense is on par with Washington's. Offensively, the Buffs are equally as balanced with their quarterback, Sefo Liufau (11 TDs and 2,150 yards passing; 7 TDs and 481 yards rushing) more of a dual threat than U-Dub's Browning. And Liufau's got a strong ground game as well with Phillip Lindsay (1,136 yards, 5.4 ypc) leading the charge for an attack with a 34.8 point per game output.

    These teams are about equal defensively and both feature outstanding secondaries. But, at the end of the day, I can't throw my support behind a Colorado team that struggled in a 10-5 win at Stanford, barely beat an injury-riddled UCLA squad 20-10 at home and just slipped by a dejected Utah team 27-22 in its home finale last weekend. 

    Truth be told, I think Southern Cal - who also beat the Buffs earlier this year - would have been the better match-up here, but unfortunately the Trojans fell short of the title game.

    The public is siding with Washington and I'll back the Huskies as well.

     


     
    BWS77
    BWS77
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 35351
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 4:56 PM ET #18

    Possibly the biggest mismatch in this game...    Kick/punt returns.

    Washington #49 in kick returns.... modest average with 2 TD returns
    Colorado #126 in kick return defense, allowing just under 27 yards/return

    Washington #15 in punt returns with 2 TD's and 11 yards/return
    Colorado #119 with 3 return TD's allowed and almost 13 yards allowed/return


    Special teams plays a big role in these games  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Possibly the biggest mismatch in this game...    Kick/punt returns.

    Washington #49 in kick returns.... modest average with 2 TD returns
    Colorado #126 in kick return defense, allowing just under 27 yards/return

    Washington #15 in punt returns with 2 TD's and 11 yards/return
    Colorado #119 with 3 return TD's allowed and almost 13 yards allowed/return


    Special teams plays a big role in these games  
     
    2LEGIT2QUITU
    2LEGIT2QUITU
    MVP
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2010
    Posts: 18900
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 5:08 PM ET #19

    USC is the 2nd best team in PAC-12........ Washington will put the beat down tonight on Colorado!! Prediction 35-21 Huskies!!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    USC is the 2nd best team in PAC-12........ Washington will put the beat down tonight on Colorado!! Prediction 35-21 Huskies!!
     
    Girlsports6
    Girlsports6
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 41
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 5:36 PM ET #20

    I've been siding with Washington all season. But as stated in this write up Colorado has been managing to get by awful teams and with this Bowl game on the line I believe they will cover the points of +7.5. I believe Washington has been having a rough season end they may win this game out right but just don't have the confidence that they will cover the points. With that being said I'm just a girl that loves her sports and will be putting my blue faces on the Colorado to cover the spread. Let the good times roll as we say in NOLA...
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I've been siding with Washington all season. But as stated in this write up Colorado has been managing to get by awful teams and with this Bowl game on the line I believe they will cover the points of +7.5. I believe Washington has been having a rough season end they may win this game out right but just don't have the confidence that they will cover the points. With that being said I'm just a girl that loves her sports and will be putting my blue faces on the Colorado to cover the spread. Let the good times roll as we say in NOLA...
     
    alopez14325
    alopez14325
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2015
    Posts: 1182
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 5:43 PM ET #21

    Ross ran a 4.25, Pettis is a 4.3-4.4 guy, but McClatcher is also a 4.2-4.3 guy.... I am not suggesting that this will be a blow out, but when you look at what the best defenses in the Pac 12 have done to Colorado, they have all shut them down.  IMO Washington is the best defense in the PAC 12, and they match up really well against Colorado... Washington's defensive scheme is advanced for the college level, they run a base 3-4 defense, and have w defensive lineman above 300 lbs.  These arent just big guys, they're nimble, and do a great job taking on blockers and stopping the run....

    USC's offense is a completely different animal than Colorado.  I'm not saying that Colorado doesnt have a good offense, but USC has the better QB, better RB, and what I would consider to be the best WR's in the Pac 12, and one of the best in the country.  Colorado doesnt have a WR on the same level as Juju Smith Schuster, Dareus Rogers, or Daniel Imatorbhebhe. It was Darnolds' ability to throw the ball that made the difference against Washington... 

    USC has a huge OLine, with three players making the Pac 12 all conference team.  Washington had 5 offensive players to make the first team Pac 12 team, as well as one more on the 2nd team.  this includes three offensive lineman.  The Washington defense had 7 players to make the all conference team.

    Notable Stats:  Turnover's gained: Washington #1 in FBS Colorado #4 in FBS

    Turnover Margin: Washington #1 Colorado #7

    Sacks: Washington 15 Colorado 24

    Red Zone Defense Colorado 4 Washington 16

    Red Zone Offense Washington 10th- They have had 51 red zone trips, have 15 rushing TD's 23 Passing Tds;s and 9 FG's... They also score a lot of points from outside the redzone.  So this is strength vs strenth

    The biggest discrepancy is that Colorado is the worst Special teams unit in the country, they have allowed 3 Punt returns for td's. are 2nd worst in the country, allowing 27 yards per kickoff return.  They have not scored a Kickoff or Punt for  TD

    Washington is a top 10 Special teams unit they have 3 Punt return for TD's, as well as 2 TD's on kick returns.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Ross ran a 4.25, Pettis is a 4.3-4.4 guy, but McClatcher is also a 4.2-4.3 guy.... I am not suggesting that this will be a blow out, but when you look at what the best defenses in the Pac 12 have done to Colorado, they have all shut them down.  IMO Washington is the best defense in the PAC 12, and they match up really well against Colorado... Washington's defensive scheme is advanced for the college level, they run a base 3-4 defense, and have w defensive lineman above 300 lbs.  These arent just big guys, they're nimble, and do a great job taking on blockers and stopping the run....

    USC's offense is a completely different animal than Colorado.  I'm not saying that Colorado doesnt have a good offense, but USC has the better QB, better RB, and what I would consider to be the best WR's in the Pac 12, and one of the best in the country.  Colorado doesnt have a WR on the same level as Juju Smith Schuster, Dareus Rogers, or Daniel Imatorbhebhe. It was Darnolds' ability to throw the ball that made the difference against Washington... 

    USC has a huge OLine, with three players making the Pac 12 all conference team.  Washington had 5 offensive players to make the first team Pac 12 team, as well as one more on the 2nd team.  this includes three offensive lineman.  The Washington defense had 7 players to make the all conference team.

    Notable Stats:  Turnover's gained: Washington #1 in FBS Colorado #4 in FBS

    Turnover Margin: Washington #1 Colorado #7

    Sacks: Washington 15 Colorado 24

    Red Zone Defense Colorado 4 Washington 16

    Red Zone Offense Washington 10th- They have had 51 red zone trips, have 15 rushing TD's 23 Passing Tds;s and 9 FG's... They also score a lot of points from outside the redzone.  So this is strength vs strenth

    The biggest discrepancy is that Colorado is the worst Special teams unit in the country, they have allowed 3 Punt returns for td's. are 2nd worst in the country, allowing 27 yards per kickoff return.  They have not scored a Kickoff or Punt for  TD

    Washington is a top 10 Special teams unit they have 3 Punt return for TD's, as well as 2 TD's on kick returns.
     
    jimmymo
    jimmymo
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2003
    Posts: 6092
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 6:10 PM ET #22

    Quote Originally Posted by Damaged99:


    IDK man I watched that USC game and Washington was dominated on both sides of the ball.

     Colorado also had Washington on deck for the pack 12 championship on deck against Utah. 

    And I wouldnt say they got spanked by Michigan at all. They were winning at the half until Sefo Liufau was knocked out of the game...

    Wrong team may be favored here....

    This is exactly the rationale that makes me feel good about my Washington bet......and do not take that the wrong way, because I do not believe your thoughts are unreasonable.......just not in this spot......there are a lot of variables at work, including the huge P12 payoff if the UW gets into the playoff...among others that relate to the match-up......
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Damaged99:


    IDK man I watched that USC game and Washington was dominated on both sides of the ball.

     Colorado also had Washington on deck for the pack 12 championship on deck against Utah. 

    And I wouldnt say they got spanked by Michigan at all. They were winning at the half until Sefo Liufau was knocked out of the game...

    Wrong team may be favored here....

    This is exactly the rationale that makes me feel good about my Washington bet......and do not take that the wrong way, because I do not believe your thoughts are unreasonable.......just not in this spot......there are a lot of variables at work, including the huge P12 payoff if the UW gets into the playoff...among others that relate to the match-up......
     
    TopHog
    TopHog
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2011
    Posts: 2667
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 9:27 PM ET #23

    I'll say it again. Ross doesn't run a 4.2 lol


    I know you guys just see numbers that are posted and assume they are factual. They aren't.


    If he runs a 4.2, Colorado has 2 players that run a 4.2 in their secondary as well. lol


    4.2 is world class, top tier, very rare speed. 


    See what he runs in the NFL combine or Pro day, then come back. 
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    I'll say it again. Ross doesn't run a 4.2 lol


    I know you guys just see numbers that are posted and assume they are factual. They aren't.


    If he runs a 4.2, Colorado has 2 players that run a 4.2 in their secondary as well. lol


    4.2 is world class, top tier, very rare speed. 


    See what he runs in the NFL combine or Pro day, then come back. 
     
    TeddyZ
    TeddyZ
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2013
    Posts: 1027
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 10:27 PM ET #24

    If the Dawgs abandon the pass, they cover by a bunch
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    If the Dawgs abandon the pass, they cover by a bunch
     
     
    easties15
    easties15
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2010
    Posts: 1164
    Posted: Dec. 2, 2016 - 11:08 PM ET #25

    Good insight thanks!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good insight thanks!
    All Forums | College Football
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,018 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 248 Covers arrow
    • Friday 09/18/2026 759 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 4,087 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 258,456 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,443 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 21,368 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 6,122 Covers arrow
    • NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS*** 7,032 Covers arrow
    • We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 29,073 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.