• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 6
      NFL Week 6
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Seahawks-Broncos Early Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 6 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | College Football

    BRIDGE BOWLS - 2025

    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
    rosswin97
    Bridge1
    Hesed55
    Fuse
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 12671
    Posts: 122
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
     
    rosswin97
    rosswin97
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2023
    Posts: 3007
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 4:24 AM ET #26

    Quote Originally Posted by GodSquad:

    @Bridge1  Bama does suck and has no business in the playoffs. No mention by committee that they LOST to Freaking bad Florida St. It was like that game result did not exist. Doubt they score a TD vs Oklahoma D. See them losing 13-3. No way they should be giving points
    Did ND deserve to get in after losing to NIU last year? I mean a playoff team should never lose to NIU. At least if you lose to an NIU you should need to make up for it by beating at least 2 top 15th ranked teams, ND was only able to beat 15th ranked Louisville while Navy and Army were ranked 24th and 19. Bama, over the course of the season, went on to beat 4 top 16 teams with UGA being ranked 5th. FSU was ranked 37 preseason this year, last year NIU was ranked 94. At least Bama lost on the road although being 13.5 pt favs, ND lost at home being 28 pt favs. Bama was ranked 8th when they lost to 37th ranked FSU that's not too egregious, while ND was ranked 5th when they lost to NIU. 

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by GodSquad:

    @Bridge1  Bama does suck and has no business in the playoffs. No mention by committee that they LOST to Freaking bad Florida St. It was like that game result did not exist. Doubt they score a TD vs Oklahoma D. See them losing 13-3. No way they should be giving points
    Did ND deserve to get in after losing to NIU last year? I mean a playoff team should never lose to NIU. At least if you lose to an NIU you should need to make up for it by beating at least 2 top 15th ranked teams, ND was only able to beat 15th ranked Louisville while Navy and Army were ranked 24th and 19. Bama, over the course of the season, went on to beat 4 top 16 teams with UGA being ranked 5th. FSU was ranked 37 preseason this year, last year NIU was ranked 94. At least Bama lost on the road although being 13.5 pt favs, ND lost at home being 28 pt favs. Bama was ranked 8th when they lost to 37th ranked FSU that's not too egregious, while ND was ranked 5th when they lost to NIU. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 9:38 AM ET #27

    @bookieassassin

    Thanks book .. good .. no .. great stuff!!! .. I saw the quote and might be misinterpreting thinking what you said they didn't say is what they said i said .. lol .. you get what im sayin .. 

    Layin 9 in a bowl game and whether its a "rivalry" or not under normal circumstances the dog is showing up taking their best shot looking to take down a big boy  .. we need alot more than just talent diff .. 

    Banking on Wash as a 'next year' team .. young group .. improving over the year .. can't fill every major potential departure fine but will have enough by now to fill a few big holes .. team was very very FR/RS.FR/SOPH laden from what I recall and ready to step in .. 

    Do they want to play? .. does this rise to the level of 'get off my ass and open a can' .. yeah think it does .. 

    Proximity to ssn .. not waiting around for a month .. they had a week off since Oregon .. good fight .. bad taste .. one more chance here .. hard to tell if / how this impacts boise I'd expect them to always show up vs wash .. but this is a big surprise next week game off their big huge win .. i can imagine the rally falls a little flat trying to practice this wk .. 

    Fisch built AZ up from basically nothing and he did leave AZ at the alter staring down their big breakout year .. but that team really stuck together to play a very late bowl gm vs OU and sooners a much bigger challenge than expected AZ dug deep n won .. Coleman to wash stuck around to play .. and now Wash in the wake of the deboer natty run .. all teams are diff in the 'we are a team' sense but but general rule here .. teams that build together bowl together .. and wash feels like that kinda team on the cusp of a big breakout year and this is kind of the springboard into that .. maybe vets aren't playing as much but I'd expect they are available for the most part and play a bit and also 'pass the torch' .. there are so many worse situations than that for bowl gms lol .. 

    All that said yeah if it falls apart and they no show or just flat then its trouble .. demon williams leading a big comeback again not what we want .. they gotta transition from that seat of yer pants fun team into butt pounders next yr and this is a good place to start turning that dial .. .. maybe aggressive to lay 9 here but whatever .. think good chance they show up and maybe catch boise in bit of a yeah shock MW champ gm invite .. big dominating home win memory for life moment .. now gotta snap out of it and sorta caught in a time crunch .. we'll see .. 

    Reply

    @bookieassassin

    Thanks book .. good .. no .. great stuff!!! .. I saw the quote and might be misinterpreting thinking what you said they didn't say is what they said i said .. lol .. you get what im sayin .. 

    Layin 9 in a bowl game and whether its a "rivalry" or not under normal circumstances the dog is showing up taking their best shot looking to take down a big boy  .. we need alot more than just talent diff .. 

    Banking on Wash as a 'next year' team .. young group .. improving over the year .. can't fill every major potential departure fine but will have enough by now to fill a few big holes .. team was very very FR/RS.FR/SOPH laden from what I recall and ready to step in .. 

    Do they want to play? .. does this rise to the level of 'get off my ass and open a can' .. yeah think it does .. 

    Proximity to ssn .. not waiting around for a month .. they had a week off since Oregon .. good fight .. bad taste .. one more chance here .. hard to tell if / how this impacts boise I'd expect them to always show up vs wash .. but this is a big surprise next week game off their big huge win .. i can imagine the rally falls a little flat trying to practice this wk .. 

    Fisch built AZ up from basically nothing and he did leave AZ at the alter staring down their big breakout year .. but that team really stuck together to play a very late bowl gm vs OU and sooners a much bigger challenge than expected AZ dug deep n won .. Coleman to wash stuck around to play .. and now Wash in the wake of the deboer natty run .. all teams are diff in the 'we are a team' sense but but general rule here .. teams that build together bowl together .. and wash feels like that kinda team on the cusp of a big breakout year and this is kind of the springboard into that .. maybe vets aren't playing as much but I'd expect they are available for the most part and play a bit and also 'pass the torch' .. there are so many worse situations than that for bowl gms lol .. 

    All that said yeah if it falls apart and they no show or just flat then its trouble .. demon williams leading a big comeback again not what we want .. they gotta transition from that seat of yer pants fun team into butt pounders next yr and this is a good place to start turning that dial .. .. maybe aggressive to lay 9 here but whatever .. think good chance they show up and maybe catch boise in bit of a yeah shock MW champ gm invite .. big dominating home win memory for life moment .. now gotta snap out of it and sorta caught in a time crunch .. we'll see .. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 11:38 AM ET #28

    @rosswin97

    Yeah I think ND deserved to go last year 11-1 . to have a rule like can't lose to XYZ team is not a realistic measure of whether you can be a top 12 team IMO .. football's a very complicated game and obvi we can say ND was on thin ice from then on but hard n fast rules like that eventually wouldn't pass the reality test .. and ND proved that last yr in the playoff beating Indy, UGA, PSU and spirited fight and comeback vs OSU .. think it was 31-7 at half and bucks came very close to the danger zone late in that one .. And I for one think they should have gone with Bama being booted out .. think they're likely better than last year and deserved the benefit of the doubt .. 

    But yeah every year the season will will shake out just a little diff and every year we learn a little more what straws stir the drink and how far they are willing to remove themselves from the stated purpose and some of their general rules of thumb to satisfy the owners of the playoff which obvi is the conferences and the pecking order therein .. if they don't do that these conferences can just pick up and go .. so makes sense we see the CFP maneuver rankings around to set up contingencies like the miami gambit .. think its obvious that if UVA wins then they and ND are in .. Duke won so Miami is in ..  then watch them pretend they never really talked about miami beating ND till they were pinned up next to each other lol .. total make believe .. 

    and the Bama thing I think last team in they should go to TAMU .. i give them a little credit for the nasty schedule and beat UGA on the road .. but if their roster is in bad shape no prob leaving them out .. certainly not pin them up w OU and ensure one of those two makes the 2nd round .. they know TAMU would wax bama and Miami might beat OU at home .. very embarrassing !!! .. 

    Already seeing the push to get G5 outta there i suppose unless they have another major team like cincy .. and thats good IMO shouldn't be there G5 should do their own playoff .. and nothing would be more good and fun for HALF the teams and fans in FBS .. its the only level of football on earth that doesn't have a realistically winnable playoff championship ... think it would revitalize the ever more and more dying bowl season too .. and frankly I'd like to see an NIT type playoff for those left out of the CFP .. those bball teams aren't in the big dance but its a tourney and they play hard in it .. expanded playoff is dumb .. i think the best ideas are with more playoffs .. 

    Reply

    @rosswin97

    Yeah I think ND deserved to go last year 11-1 . to have a rule like can't lose to XYZ team is not a realistic measure of whether you can be a top 12 team IMO .. football's a very complicated game and obvi we can say ND was on thin ice from then on but hard n fast rules like that eventually wouldn't pass the reality test .. and ND proved that last yr in the playoff beating Indy, UGA, PSU and spirited fight and comeback vs OSU .. think it was 31-7 at half and bucks came very close to the danger zone late in that one .. And I for one think they should have gone with Bama being booted out .. think they're likely better than last year and deserved the benefit of the doubt .. 

    But yeah every year the season will will shake out just a little diff and every year we learn a little more what straws stir the drink and how far they are willing to remove themselves from the stated purpose and some of their general rules of thumb to satisfy the owners of the playoff which obvi is the conferences and the pecking order therein .. if they don't do that these conferences can just pick up and go .. so makes sense we see the CFP maneuver rankings around to set up contingencies like the miami gambit .. think its obvious that if UVA wins then they and ND are in .. Duke won so Miami is in ..  then watch them pretend they never really talked about miami beating ND till they were pinned up next to each other lol .. total make believe .. 

    and the Bama thing I think last team in they should go to TAMU .. i give them a little credit for the nasty schedule and beat UGA on the road .. but if their roster is in bad shape no prob leaving them out .. certainly not pin them up w OU and ensure one of those two makes the 2nd round .. they know TAMU would wax bama and Miami might beat OU at home .. very embarrassing !!! .. 

    Already seeing the push to get G5 outta there i suppose unless they have another major team like cincy .. and thats good IMO shouldn't be there G5 should do their own playoff .. and nothing would be more good and fun for HALF the teams and fans in FBS .. its the only level of football on earth that doesn't have a realistically winnable playoff championship ... think it would revitalize the ever more and more dying bowl season too .. and frankly I'd like to see an NIT type playoff for those left out of the CFP .. those bball teams aren't in the big dance but its a tourney and they play hard in it .. expanded playoff is dumb .. i think the best ideas are with more playoffs .. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 11:59 AM ET #29

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/10
    PLAYS .. WAGER / TO WIN (IN UNITS) clover

    UCONN +2.5  .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5   .66/.6
    NAVY ML      .4/.63
    NAVY -1     1.1/1.0

    UTAH -14  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 

    WASHINGTON -9  .77/.7

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS .03/.62
    NAVY, VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY, HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

    Reply

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/10
    PLAYS .. WAGER / TO WIN (IN UNITS) clover

    UCONN +2.5  .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5   .66/.6
    NAVY ML      .4/.63
    NAVY -1     1.1/1.0

    UTAH -14  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 

    WASHINGTON -9  .77/.7

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS .03/.62
    NAVY, VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY, HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

     
    rosswin97
    rosswin97
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2023
    Posts: 3007
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 12:01 PM ET #30

    @Bridge1

    I disagree. What they did in the playoffs is irrelevant if perhaps they shouldn’t have been there to begin with. I’ve noticed people tend to use hindsight when discussing playoff teams like saying fsu finished 5-7 but they weren’t 5-7 when Bama played them. 

    Reply

    @Bridge1

    I disagree. What they did in the playoffs is irrelevant if perhaps they shouldn’t have been there to begin with. I’ve noticed people tend to use hindsight when discussing playoff teams like saying fsu finished 5-7 but they weren’t 5-7 when Bama played them. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 1:36 PM ET #31

    @rosswin97

    Well I'm just not one for hard n fast rules like that .. Something such as 'no top 12 team could ever lose to such a team as "they" ..' .. the first debate has to be had as to where the 'they' team line is .. we can say NIU was a 'they' team last year but they did have top 20-ish defense in some models .. hard to deny they were a very good unit .. and they won the game largely with that defense .. but ok I can get on board with NIU was a 'they' team for argument sake by virtue of them being a MAC team .. now if ND wins by 1 are they passing the red line test and can submit their resume? .. that's maybe a debate too .. some have argued that in-fact they should be winning by at least 1 or 2 TD's to prove their elite worthiness .. we have to settle that as well .. also Riley Leonard reaggravated his ankle injury in the game .. slippery slope to discount all injuries and say they don't matter an elite team will always find ways to win .. But eventually I think we will run into a situation we'll want to make exceptions and be stuck w our injuries don't matter rule ..

    All I'm saying is there's a few arbitrary parameters we need to settle by having a rule like that and it does end up begging even more questions with arbitrary answers .. and all that to say at the end of the day if ND won by 1 point does that then satisfy the rule .. and maybe for NIU its 1 point but say it was umass .. gotta win by at least 2-3 scores id think .. need to set some margin of victory red line for some games to make this rule work as intended .. 

    I think the unintended consequence is it would place more emphasis on a team to make sure they dont trip over these red lines when we'd rather have the best teams focus on playing their best football in their biggest games .. small games you oft rest your players, etc .. tend to schedule these after big games like ND did @TAMU... 

    And end of the day there is now an easy way to skip such an arduous debate .. hindsight has made it self evident that in-deed a top 12 team could lose to a lowly NIU team .. 

     

     

     

    Reply

    @rosswin97

    Well I'm just not one for hard n fast rules like that .. Something such as 'no top 12 team could ever lose to such a team as "they" ..' .. the first debate has to be had as to where the 'they' team line is .. we can say NIU was a 'they' team last year but they did have top 20-ish defense in some models .. hard to deny they were a very good unit .. and they won the game largely with that defense .. but ok I can get on board with NIU was a 'they' team for argument sake by virtue of them being a MAC team .. now if ND wins by 1 are they passing the red line test and can submit their resume? .. that's maybe a debate too .. some have argued that in-fact they should be winning by at least 1 or 2 TD's to prove their elite worthiness .. we have to settle that as well .. also Riley Leonard reaggravated his ankle injury in the game .. slippery slope to discount all injuries and say they don't matter an elite team will always find ways to win .. But eventually I think we will run into a situation we'll want to make exceptions and be stuck w our injuries don't matter rule ..

    All I'm saying is there's a few arbitrary parameters we need to settle by having a rule like that and it does end up begging even more questions with arbitrary answers .. and all that to say at the end of the day if ND won by 1 point does that then satisfy the rule .. and maybe for NIU its 1 point but say it was umass .. gotta win by at least 2-3 scores id think .. need to set some margin of victory red line for some games to make this rule work as intended .. 

    I think the unintended consequence is it would place more emphasis on a team to make sure they dont trip over these red lines when we'd rather have the best teams focus on playing their best football in their biggest games .. small games you oft rest your players, etc .. tend to schedule these after big games like ND did @TAMU... 

    And end of the day there is now an easy way to skip such an arduous debate .. hindsight has made it self evident that in-deed a top 12 team could lose to a lowly NIU team .. 

     

     

     

     
    rosswin97
    rosswin97
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2023
    Posts: 3007
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 1:45 PM ET #32

    @Bridge1

     Yea a 1 pt win isn’t that impressive either and wouldn’t hold that much weight. Didn’t know Leonard got hurt or reinjured himself yea depending what n when in the game it has some merit I guess even though it’s notre dame 

    Reply

    @Bridge1

     Yea a 1 pt win isn’t that impressive either and wouldn’t hold that much weight. Didn’t know Leonard got hurt or reinjured himself yea depending what n when in the game it has some merit I guess even though it’s notre dame 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 2:28 PM ET #33

    @rosswin97

    Yeah the other thing to say for last year is it was the first year of the expanded playoffs .. never before have we needed to debate outside whose 4th or 5th and I could certainly see ND not getting the not on a loss to NIU in a 4 team playoff .. '23 they had one loss to cincy .. it just so happened they were the 4th best team and thus no other argument except hit the bicks ND you don't deserve it .. don't schedule playoff bound G5 teams guys yer gunna be 5th every time ... but last year was all new and not the time to lay down the red line trip wires .. this year if they beat Miami FL and TAMU and lost to Miami Oh or some nobody it would be a shame if they didn't make it .. as it is they landed on the bubble .. good arguments to be made each way .. the where they were ranked argument has no baring on me those people aren't ranking the best teams they are stooges and ND mad that they got stooged by em .. well don't schedule top 10 teams the first 2 weeks ND .. hit the bricks again .. 

    Reply

    @rosswin97

    Yeah the other thing to say for last year is it was the first year of the expanded playoffs .. never before have we needed to debate outside whose 4th or 5th and I could certainly see ND not getting the not on a loss to NIU in a 4 team playoff .. '23 they had one loss to cincy .. it just so happened they were the 4th best team and thus no other argument except hit the bicks ND you don't deserve it .. don't schedule playoff bound G5 teams guys yer gunna be 5th every time ... but last year was all new and not the time to lay down the red line trip wires .. this year if they beat Miami FL and TAMU and lost to Miami Oh or some nobody it would be a shame if they didn't make it .. as it is they landed on the bubble .. good arguments to be made each way .. the where they were ranked argument has no baring on me those people aren't ranking the best teams they are stooges and ND mad that they got stooged by em .. well don't schedule top 10 teams the first 2 weeks ND .. hit the bricks again .. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 6:42 PM ET #34

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS

    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    Here's a couple of nasty defenses .. TTECH with maybe the nastiest front of them all .. Oregon with a good OL but we've seen em get stifled a few times .. Ducks needed OT to break 24 pts .. 20 vs Indy, 21 vs Wisco, 18 @Iowa, 26 @Wash .. Struggled passing vs Indy, Wisco and Iowa .... struggled rushing vs Wash and Indy .. The ceiling is high for their offense but there does seem to be one and I think they'll reach it in this game like the others .. TTech has put up some high point totals but alot of it has to do with D setting things up when teams get into that desperation mode .. one of these teams will prob get there in this game but I suspect it won't be early on like we saw with BYU .. TTech's offense has struggleed passing numerous games but with a caveat they've been dealing with many backups and injuries .. Morton has done pretty good for the most part .. run game has been pretty good but the yds / att aren't blowing anyone away .. could break 52.5 for sure but just seems a few too high more often stays low I think .. good luck!

    Reply

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS

    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    Here's a couple of nasty defenses .. TTECH with maybe the nastiest front of them all .. Oregon with a good OL but we've seen em get stifled a few times .. Ducks needed OT to break 24 pts .. 20 vs Indy, 21 vs Wisco, 18 @Iowa, 26 @Wash .. Struggled passing vs Indy, Wisco and Iowa .... struggled rushing vs Wash and Indy .. The ceiling is high for their offense but there does seem to be one and I think they'll reach it in this game like the others .. TTech has put up some high point totals but alot of it has to do with D setting things up when teams get into that desperation mode .. one of these teams will prob get there in this game but I suspect it won't be early on like we saw with BYU .. TTech's offense has struggleed passing numerous games but with a caveat they've been dealing with many backups and injuries .. Morton has done pretty good for the most part .. run game has been pretty good but the yds / att aren't blowing anyone away .. could break 52.5 for sure but just seems a few too high more often stays low I think .. good luck!

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 10, 2025 - 6:49 PM ET #35

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    No Byrum .. Bye Bye Bye BY-RUM!!! .. 

    Reply

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    No Byrum .. Bye Bye Bye BY-RUM!!! .. 

     
    Hesed55
    Hesed55
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2025
    Posts: 744
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2025 - 1:17 AM ET #36

    Im with you on the Huskies B1. Your write up convinced me. Even though I think Boise's coach is better, they are in a tough spot and Huskies are hungry for a redemption win after a fresh loss to the ducks

    Reply

    Im with you on the Huskies B1. Your write up convinced me. Even though I think Boise's coach is better, they are in a tough spot and Huskies are hungry for a redemption win after a fresh loss to the ducks

     
    Fuse
    Fuse
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2016
    Posts: 85070
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2025 - 9:18 AM ET #37

    GL this season and on peace_5peaceclover

    Learn, be content and stay disciplined.
    Reply

    GL this season and on peace_5peaceclover

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2025 - 1:45 PM ET #38

    @Hesed55

     Yeah banking on a few things when layin 9/10 points in a bowl gm .. its definitely one we reallllly need Wash to take the wheel early .. if they dick around Boise will most certainly oblige them and stick around .. maybe win .. 

    But big picture we get wash firing off the bat it does feel like Boise won't score much here and the hope is we get DEMON DOIN DEMON THINGS and go from there .. thats the hope anyway .. fingers xx'd its 31-10 or so .. good luck!

    Reply

    @Hesed55

     Yeah banking on a few things when layin 9/10 points in a bowl gm .. its definitely one we reallllly need Wash to take the wheel early .. if they dick around Boise will most certainly oblige them and stick around .. maybe win .. 

    But big picture we get wash firing off the bat it does feel like Boise won't score much here and the hope is we get DEMON DOIN DEMON THINGS and go from there .. thats the hope anyway .. fingers xx'd its 31-10 or so .. good luck!

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2025 - 1:56 PM ET #39

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/13
    PLAYS .. WAGER / TO WIN (IN UNITS) clover

    UCONN +2.5  .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 (vs Cincy) 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5 (vs Cincy)   .66/.6
    NAVY    ML (vs Cincy)     .4/.63
    NAVY     -1 (vs Cincy)   1.1/1.0

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7

    UTAH -14  .88/.8
    UTAH -16  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    OLD DOM ML/U55.5 .3/1.15

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5
    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS .03/.62
    NAVY (vs Cincy), VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY (vs Cincy), HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5
    NAVY (vs Army) ML/U38.5, S.DAK, WASH-9.5, JVILL 0.3/1.23

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

    Reply

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/13
    PLAYS .. WAGER / TO WIN (IN UNITS) clover

    UCONN +2.5  .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 (vs Cincy) 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5 (vs Cincy)   .66/.6
    NAVY    ML (vs Cincy)     .4/.63
    NAVY     -1 (vs Cincy)   1.1/1.0

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7

    UTAH -14  .88/.8
    UTAH -16  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    OLD DOM ML/U55.5 .3/1.15

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - QUARTERFINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5
    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS .03/.62
    NAVY (vs Cincy), VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY (vs Cincy), HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5
    NAVY (vs Army) ML/U38.5, S.DAK, WASH-9.5, JVILL 0.3/1.23

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 13, 2025 - 11:45 PM ET #40

    DOWN 0.1 UNITS

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3 moneybag
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7 moneybag

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5 an_burningbag
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4 an_burningbag

    Friggin Tarleton ruins the day after the quick 14-zip start ... Total Puke 

    Reply

    DOWN 0.1 UNITS

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3 moneybag
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7 moneybag

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5 an_burningbag
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4 an_burningbag

    Friggin Tarleton ruins the day after the quick 14-zip start ... Total Puke 

     
    Hesed55
    Hesed55
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2025
    Posts: 744
    Posted: Dec. 14, 2025 - 12:41 AM ET #41

    @Bridge1

     The Huskies were a no sweat bet. Easy money. Great call and thanks again brother

    Reply

    @Bridge1

     The Huskies were a no sweat bet. Easy money. Great call and thanks again brother

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 14, 2025 - 7:48 AM ET #42

    @Hesed55

     hahaa .. as long as both teams did everything I said they should do then it was money in daaa bank lol .. peace_5 cool

    Reply

    @Hesed55

     hahaa .. as long as both teams did everything I said they should do then it was money in daaa bank lol .. peace_5 cool

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 14, 2025 - 11:26 AM ET #43

    JVILL / TROY OVER 46.5 .44/.4

    Opened 51 and I think folks had the right idea here generally with Troy being a little bit defensive oriented and everyone saw Goose hobble off the field vs JMU in what we'd describe as a defensive slugfest .. they've also got a few injuries and xfers .. as it stands .. ALL of the xfers are out for this game .. bummer .. RB Tre Meadows and the with another OL injury this unit sounds a bit iffy .. We also saw JVILLE look inept in the scoring department last game and we don't know for sure whose in or out for them 

    So we get why the total went down so far .. 

    Couple things to like .. one its a bowl with probably a mix on the levels of motivations .. Jvill's D has been crap all year and its a battle of little bama teams playing in bama yer gunna get some motivation outta that .. Troy maybe in a bit of a downer spot here though coming off the SUPERMAX EFFORT vs JMU .. sure looks like they left it all on the field that gm and maybe a little banged up in some areas .. and here we are with a fairly short turnaround to get back in the saddle .. it feels like outside of the 'Showdown in Little Bama' thing there's not tons of motivation here and team could be a little flat .. very much a spot boise was kinda in .. diff opponent tho .. One thing to note in the news is Goose has been full practicing and seems like a decent shot he's good to go .. expect to still see Kilcrease and both QB's can actually lead the charge vs a D like Jville .. 

    I'd expect this bowl means more to JVILLE also off their losing effort in the conf champ game but not nearly the slug fest and less of a hangover .. 3rd year in FBS, 3rd bowl game .. diff HC but they did show up for the last 2 bowl games and think they will here .. Sounds like Cook is in and needs 129 yds rushing to be the all time JVILL rushing leader which he can accomplish in one season lol WOW!! .. not much but maybe prop of O99 yds is worth considering .. if Cook is in I'd expect everyone rallies to their major dude leader .. Troy run D is not great btw .. quite a few 200-300+ yd ROMPS vs their D and JVILL has the weapons in Cook and at QB to run all over this squad .. We've also seen a recent surge in passing with 6'8 Dre Johnson looking like a LEGIT MAJOR DUDE at times down the stretch .. he's a huge weapon ..

    Hoping JVILL gets more traction on the ground than last gm vs Kenny and more red zone success .. horrific play calling and other crummy luck in that gm cost em in the red zone over n over .. and think the total has a bit of recency bias baked in along with some general who knows about either team showing up and just seems like it would be easy enough to get this to go over esp if JVILL can take charge with some scoring drives in H1 .. 

    Reply

    JVILL / TROY OVER 46.5 .44/.4

    Opened 51 and I think folks had the right idea here generally with Troy being a little bit defensive oriented and everyone saw Goose hobble off the field vs JMU in what we'd describe as a defensive slugfest .. they've also got a few injuries and xfers .. as it stands .. ALL of the xfers are out for this game .. bummer .. RB Tre Meadows and the with another OL injury this unit sounds a bit iffy .. We also saw JVILLE look inept in the scoring department last game and we don't know for sure whose in or out for them 

    So we get why the total went down so far .. 

    Couple things to like .. one its a bowl with probably a mix on the levels of motivations .. Jvill's D has been crap all year and its a battle of little bama teams playing in bama yer gunna get some motivation outta that .. Troy maybe in a bit of a downer spot here though coming off the SUPERMAX EFFORT vs JMU .. sure looks like they left it all on the field that gm and maybe a little banged up in some areas .. and here we are with a fairly short turnaround to get back in the saddle .. it feels like outside of the 'Showdown in Little Bama' thing there's not tons of motivation here and team could be a little flat .. very much a spot boise was kinda in .. diff opponent tho .. One thing to note in the news is Goose has been full practicing and seems like a decent shot he's good to go .. expect to still see Kilcrease and both QB's can actually lead the charge vs a D like Jville .. 

    I'd expect this bowl means more to JVILLE also off their losing effort in the conf champ game but not nearly the slug fest and less of a hangover .. 3rd year in FBS, 3rd bowl game .. diff HC but they did show up for the last 2 bowl games and think they will here .. Sounds like Cook is in and needs 129 yds rushing to be the all time JVILL rushing leader which he can accomplish in one season lol WOW!! .. not much but maybe prop of O99 yds is worth considering .. if Cook is in I'd expect everyone rallies to their major dude leader .. Troy run D is not great btw .. quite a few 200-300+ yd ROMPS vs their D and JVILL has the weapons in Cook and at QB to run all over this squad .. We've also seen a recent surge in passing with 6'8 Dre Johnson looking like a LEGIT MAJOR DUDE at times down the stretch .. he's a huge weapon ..

    Hoping JVILL gets more traction on the ground than last gm vs Kenny and more red zone success .. horrific play calling and other crummy luck in that gm cost em in the red zone over n over .. and think the total has a bit of recency bias baked in along with some general who knows about either team showing up and just seems like it would be easy enough to get this to go over esp if JVILL can take charge with some scoring drives in H1 .. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 14, 2025 - 11:29 PM ET #44

    BOWL PLAY

    ARMY -7   2.7 / 2.5

    Get this line pretty much anywhere now we're a little late to the party .. shoulda hit it in the last couple days at 5.5 and 6.5 .. could come back to bite us but the crux of the play is we expect Army like other service academies to make the most of their bowl game once again with good stable coaching and roster situations ..

    Uconn seems to be going down the tubes after HC Jim Mora skipped to Colo State .. chain reaction the OC becoming the interim HC and will coach the game but he's the TCU OC next year .. DC is on the website but he's Co-DC / LB coach at Miss State .. wouldn't surprise me if the D job is left to less qualified remaining staff .. this sparked a considerable number of opt outs including the QB and the big major stars on offense going pro and a number of others in the portal I'd imagine happy to talk about xferring to TCU with the OC .. can't imagine the OC truly cares to see those guys play unless they really want to .. but right now the RB group is to the 4th or 5th string, the major dude WR is out 3 starting OL's out another Ty Chan played a couple snaps vs AF so maybe that's one more .. Xfers to top LB and 2 CB's .. 2 potential injuries at DT including a key NT they'll need in this game .. they do have exp backup QB in Nick Evers .. big step down but could be productive.. Word still not out on some of the xfers playing but the dye has kinda been cast .. I don't think we'll get into a "Marshall Situation" from last yr but lotta moves and Uconn will be off a full month by the time this gm is played .. final gm week 13 .. lotta time to rally to the spot maybe .. also time to lose interest and rally to next year .. I could see this line going further out if things really spiral if xfers confirm they're out .. so taking the risk with 7 now think there's still some big upside .. hard to imagine this line could dip back below 4.5 without some very bad Army injury news or drastic turn in Uconn's prospects to show up strong .. 

    We got a peek at Army last week and they looked pretty good .. maybe one reason this hangs at 7 still is that Army didn't win but also only 16 pts scored .. generally we get ARMY / NAVY throwback to the olden days on offense with longer drawn out drives and fewer offensive plays overall .. Still expect a run heavy affair but Uconn giving up 5 - 6 yds / rush the last 5 games and given the likely number of quality opt outs and coaching sitch think Army will be fine in the scoring dept .. 

    Good luck

    Reply

    BOWL PLAY

    ARMY -7   2.7 / 2.5

    Get this line pretty much anywhere now we're a little late to the party .. shoulda hit it in the last couple days at 5.5 and 6.5 .. could come back to bite us but the crux of the play is we expect Army like other service academies to make the most of their bowl game once again with good stable coaching and roster situations ..

    Uconn seems to be going down the tubes after HC Jim Mora skipped to Colo State .. chain reaction the OC becoming the interim HC and will coach the game but he's the TCU OC next year .. DC is on the website but he's Co-DC / LB coach at Miss State .. wouldn't surprise me if the D job is left to less qualified remaining staff .. this sparked a considerable number of opt outs including the QB and the big major stars on offense going pro and a number of others in the portal I'd imagine happy to talk about xferring to TCU with the OC .. can't imagine the OC truly cares to see those guys play unless they really want to .. but right now the RB group is to the 4th or 5th string, the major dude WR is out 3 starting OL's out another Ty Chan played a couple snaps vs AF so maybe that's one more .. Xfers to top LB and 2 CB's .. 2 potential injuries at DT including a key NT they'll need in this game .. they do have exp backup QB in Nick Evers .. big step down but could be productive.. Word still not out on some of the xfers playing but the dye has kinda been cast .. I don't think we'll get into a "Marshall Situation" from last yr but lotta moves and Uconn will be off a full month by the time this gm is played .. final gm week 13 .. lotta time to rally to the spot maybe .. also time to lose interest and rally to next year .. I could see this line going further out if things really spiral if xfers confirm they're out .. so taking the risk with 7 now think there's still some big upside .. hard to imagine this line could dip back below 4.5 without some very bad Army injury news or drastic turn in Uconn's prospects to show up strong .. 

    We got a peek at Army last week and they looked pretty good .. maybe one reason this hangs at 7 still is that Army didn't win but also only 16 pts scored .. generally we get ARMY / NAVY throwback to the olden days on offense with longer drawn out drives and fewer offensive plays overall .. Still expect a run heavy affair but Uconn giving up 5 - 6 yds / rush the last 5 games and given the likely number of quality opt outs and coaching sitch think Army will be fine in the scoring dept .. 

    Good luck

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 1:41 PM ET #45

    Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:

    BOWL PLAY ARMY -7   2.7 / 2.5

    Got that in the nick of time .. hope transmission received last night and yer in w us ..  moving to -8.5 globally in last 5 mins .. I assume some big name is confirmed out like the just named AA WR or some other guys .. anyway .. trouble keeps coming and its one sided, GO ARMY! .. cool

    Reply

    Quote Originally Posted by Bridge1:

    BOWL PLAY ARMY -7   2.7 / 2.5

    Got that in the nick of time .. hope transmission received last night and yer in w us ..  moving to -8.5 globally in last 5 mins .. I assume some big name is confirmed out like the just named AA WR or some other guys .. anyway .. trouble keeps coming and its one sided, GO ARMY! .. cool

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 2:02 PM ET #46

    BOWL PLAY

    PITTSBURGH -7 .63/.6 (MGM)

    It's portal Monday apparently with lot of names getting dropped in today .. News of Houser hitting the portal seems pretty devestating and with the OC moving on and his stock now back up after couple good seasons time is now for him to move on .. Hard to tell what to make of ECU in this spot they'll be without a few guys .. Haven't seen much if any major PITT outs .. what I liked from Pitt is despite lot of injuries they showed up last year as -8.5 point favs with QB out and numerous others on the OL thru the season .. they put their best foot forward and IMO we got lucky taking the points with toledo .. even w the full roster they needed a bit of luck to cover last year's bowl ... eventually went to OT and then went to the 2pt convos and lotta replays and reversals before a big emotional win for the rockets .. Pitt looked pretty pissed over it they were playin hard .. Pitt with a number of guys who haven't had a bowl win esp the FCS guys OC Kirwin Bell brought in w him ..

    Also like the new QB that took over after Holstein was benched .. offense should be rockin n rollin here .. hard to imagine all the pieces of their VERY VERY GOOD run D play this game but this is a team that stuck together last year .. they won their first 7 with a couple miracles then lost the final 5 reg ssn games plus the very dramatic bowl game vs neighboring rust belter Toledo for a 6 game losing strak .. thought they'd scatter to the portal wind but team stuck together and nearly had a big big season .. hope we see a number of em play in this gm but think we can also trust Narduzzi to have some bullets to fire off the bench esp in that D front if some of the major studs go missing for this gm .. 

    Think the move from -4.5 to -7 is not quite enough for the Houser and other news considering this was about -6 or -7 when it came out so just back to the opening line .. I'd expect this should be over a TD and maybe closer to 10 for losing a solid QB and OC and very possible others from the offense leak out here .. getting a deal for now at least until Pitt gets some bad news but I suspect they are well above the average 'WANT' level for this game whereas the normally bowl hungry ECU team has taken a tough turn and I'd say now very much ... teetering .. 

    Reply

    BOWL PLAY

    PITTSBURGH -7 .63/.6 (MGM)

    It's portal Monday apparently with lot of names getting dropped in today .. News of Houser hitting the portal seems pretty devestating and with the OC moving on and his stock now back up after couple good seasons time is now for him to move on .. Hard to tell what to make of ECU in this spot they'll be without a few guys .. Haven't seen much if any major PITT outs .. what I liked from Pitt is despite lot of injuries they showed up last year as -8.5 point favs with QB out and numerous others on the OL thru the season .. they put their best foot forward and IMO we got lucky taking the points with toledo .. even w the full roster they needed a bit of luck to cover last year's bowl ... eventually went to OT and then went to the 2pt convos and lotta replays and reversals before a big emotional win for the rockets .. Pitt looked pretty pissed over it they were playin hard .. Pitt with a number of guys who haven't had a bowl win esp the FCS guys OC Kirwin Bell brought in w him ..

    Also like the new QB that took over after Holstein was benched .. offense should be rockin n rollin here .. hard to imagine all the pieces of their VERY VERY GOOD run D play this game but this is a team that stuck together last year .. they won their first 7 with a couple miracles then lost the final 5 reg ssn games plus the very dramatic bowl game vs neighboring rust belter Toledo for a 6 game losing strak .. thought they'd scatter to the portal wind but team stuck together and nearly had a big big season .. hope we see a number of em play in this gm but think we can also trust Narduzzi to have some bullets to fire off the bench esp in that D front if some of the major studs go missing for this gm .. 

    Think the move from -4.5 to -7 is not quite enough for the Houser and other news considering this was about -6 or -7 when it came out so just back to the opening line .. I'd expect this should be over a TD and maybe closer to 10 for losing a solid QB and OC and very possible others from the offense leak out here .. getting a deal for now at least until Pitt gets some bad news but I suspect they are well above the average 'WANT' level for this game whereas the normally bowl hungry ECU team has taken a tough turn and I'd say now very much ... teetering .. 

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 2:25 PM ET #47

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/15  clover

    BOWL SSN: 2-3, -.3 UNITS

    UCONN +2.5   .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY  -7       2.7/2.5

    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5 an_burningbag
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4 an_burningbag

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 (vs Cincy) 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5 (vs Cincy)   .66/.6
    NAVY    ML (vs Cincy)     .4/.63
    NAVY     -1 (vs Cincy)   1.1/1.0

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3 moneybag
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7 moneybag

    UTAH -14  .88/.8
    UTAH -16  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    PITTSBURGH -7 .63/.6

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 an_burningbag

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    OLD DOM ML/U55.5 .3/1.15

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    JVILL / TROY OVER 46.5 .44/.4

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - Q.FINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5
    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO  .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS  .03/.62
    NAVY (vs Cincy), VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY (vs Cincy), HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5
    NAVY (vs Army) ML/U38.5, S.DAK, WASH-9.5, JVILL .04/1.23 an_burningbag

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1 peace_5

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

    </

    Reply

    BRIDGE BOWLS 12/15  clover

    BOWL SSN: 2-3, -.3 UNITS

    UCONN +2.5   .44/.4 (MID)
    ARMY +1.5     .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY  -7       2.7/2.5

    ARMY / UCONN OVER 48.5   .55/.5 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN UNDER 52.5 .33/.3 (MID)
    ARMY / UCONN OVER 50.5   .44/.4

    MINNESOTA -3     .31/.3
    MINNESOTA -2.5  .21/.2

    DELAWARE +2.5 .33/.3
    DELAWARE +3.5 .33/.3

    TARLETON -8.5 .55/.5 an_burningbag
    TARLETON -9.5 .46/.4 an_burningbag

    HOUSTON -3    1.1/1.0
    HOUSTON ML    .49/.4
    HOUSTON +1.5 .22/.2
    HOUSTON -3.5  .33/.3

    NAVY +4.5 (vs Cincy) 1.81/1.68
    NAVY +5.5 (vs Cincy)   .66/.6
    NAVY    ML (vs Cincy)     .4/.63
    NAVY     -1 (vs Cincy)   1.1/1.0

    WASHINGTON -7.5  .31/.3 moneybag
    WASHINGTON -9     .77/.7 moneybag

    UTAH -14  .88/.8
    UTAH -16  .88/.8

    UTSA -8.5  .33/.3

    OHIO +4.5  .66/.6

    OLE MISS -17  .88/.8

    NC STATE -1.5 .33/.3

    ILLINOIS +5.5 .44/.4

    LA TECH -6.5   .75/.68

    PITTSBURGH -7 .63/.6

    TEXAS A&M -3.5  .44/.4 

    S.DAKOTA +7.5  .25/.23 an_burningbag

    VANDY ML/O46.5  .4/.74

    OLD DOM ML/U55.5 .3/1.15

    JMU / OREG UNDER 50.5  .9/.8

    JVILL / TROY OVER 46.5 .44/.4

    PSU / CLEM UNDER 48.5  .33/.3

    MICH / TEXAS UNDER 47.5  .33/.3

    S.FLA / OLD DOM UNDER 55.5 .44/.4

    MIZZ ST / ARK ST UNDER 58.5 .23/.2

    HYPO - Q.FINALS
    OU / INDY -7 .575/.5
    BAMA / INDY -5  .575/.5
    OREG / TTECH UNDER 52.5 .46/.4

    PARLAY FUN
    JVILL, DEL, OHIO  .02/.22
    JVILL, DEL, OU, SO.MISS  .03/.62
    NAVY (vs Cincy), VANDY, DEL, WASH  .1/1.17
    NAVY (vs Cincy), HOU, MINN, LTECH -7, WASH -9  .1/3.5
    NAVY (vs Army) ML/U38.5, S.DAK, WASH-9.5, JVILL .04/1.23 an_burningbag

    HEISMAN
    DIEGO PAVIA 300-1 peace_5

    MAKE NATTY 
    OHIO STATE -120 WK12

    NATTY:
    TEXAS TECH 175-1
    TEXAS TECH 12-1 WK15
    OHIO STATE 2-1 WK12

    </

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 3:14 PM ET #48

    BOWL PLAY

    FRESNO -3.5 (MGM) .. 1.1/1.0

    Expecting a solid show up for Fresno w the NDSU coaches first FBS bowl season .. seein -4.5 and moving higher at some spots .. MGM still -3.5 .. would get down sooner than later ..

    Don't really wanna lay toooo many here because MIA OH is not usually MIA in bowl games so .. GOOD LUCK!

    Reply

    BOWL PLAY

    FRESNO -3.5 (MGM) .. 1.1/1.0

    Expecting a solid show up for Fresno w the NDSU coaches first FBS bowl season .. seein -4.5 and moving higher at some spots .. MGM still -3.5 .. would get down sooner than later ..

    Don't really wanna lay toooo many here because MIA OH is not usually MIA in bowl games so .. GOOD LUCK!

     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 3:32 PM ET #49

    PARLAY

    PITT -7, FRES, HOU, ILL, TCU .. .05/1.53

    Little fun .. like Pitt and think they can cover that off the news .. Fresno now looks like a mover take them for the win .. ILL been steady lowering we'll see what the news is there .. did see the big LB Gabe is out for the Illini and a couple others but Altmeyer says he's ready to rock and saw some guys dropping for Tenn and kinda expect a few more there so .. recent line move suggests there's some significant news from Tenn but idk what it is .. TCU says they're ready to rock and feels like they showed up ready last year in the very very late bowl spot to drop the hammer last year so getting good odds for a bowl team saying they're showing up .. I'd half expect some of the very best USC WR's to not be fully committed to that gm .. lot to lose for them but so far no word there .. - GOOD LUCK!

    Reply

    PARLAY

    PITT -7, FRES, HOU, ILL, TCU .. .05/1.53

    Little fun .. like Pitt and think they can cover that off the news .. Fresno now looks like a mover take them for the win .. ILL been steady lowering we'll see what the news is there .. did see the big LB Gabe is out for the Illini and a couple others but Altmeyer says he's ready to rock and saw some guys dropping for Tenn and kinda expect a few more there so .. recent line move suggests there's some significant news from Tenn but idk what it is .. TCU says they're ready to rock and feels like they showed up ready last year in the very very late bowl spot to drop the hammer last year so getting good odds for a bowl team saying they're showing up .. I'd half expect some of the very best USC WR's to not be fully committed to that gm .. lot to lose for them but so far no word there .. - GOOD LUCK!

     
     
    Bridge1
    Bridge1
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Aug, 2014
    Posts: 6378
    Posted: Dec. 15, 2025 - 4:36 PM ET #50

    BOWL PLAY

    TCU +6.5 .. 1.1/1.0 (BOL)

    6.5 won't be around for long at BOL but you can find some 6.5's layin -115 or 6's at -110 .. we're a ways out but TCU so far sounds like they expecting to show up and I'm not saying this was the best team this year they do have a few good pieces .. some might in-deed bail out on us before the bowl comes .. but I like the prospect of a team kinda knowing they wanna show up and beat another big name early on for a late 12/30 bowl catching nearly a TD .. USC with a full roster could prob handle this line but my suspicion early was they gotta be busy making moves for next year and might not be very enticing to some of their BIG MAJOR stars like the WR duo to show up to this one .. already seeing J'Kobi Lane declaring for the NFL so that would be one if he confirms he's out for the bowl .. I would expect Maiava to play but just a good sich in my view with TCU rating much higher on the Famous "BRIDGE BOWL WANT METER" and catching nearly a TD .. GOOD LUCK! 

    Reply

    BOWL PLAY

    TCU +6.5 .. 1.1/1.0 (BOL)

    6.5 won't be around for long at BOL but you can find some 6.5's layin -115 or 6's at -110 .. we're a ways out but TCU so far sounds like they expecting to show up and I'm not saying this was the best team this year they do have a few good pieces .. some might in-deed bail out on us before the bowl comes .. but I like the prospect of a team kinda knowing they wanna show up and beat another big name early on for a late 12/30 bowl catching nearly a TD .. USC with a full roster could prob handle this line but my suspicion early was they gotta be busy making moves for next year and might not be very enticing to some of their BIG MAJOR stars like the WR duo to show up to this one .. already seeing J'Kobi Lane declaring for the NFL so that would be one if he confirms he's out for the bowl .. I would expect Maiava to play but just a good sich in my view with TCU rating much higher on the Famous "BRIDGE BOWL WANT METER" and catching nearly a TD .. GOOD LUCK! 

    All Forums | College Football
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Bills vs Rams in-game live MNF 2,873
    • Tuesday 10/13/2026 701
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 106,983
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 41,016
    • Rams kicker 652
    • Lies, Inaccuracies &amp; Stupidity 32,872
    • NFL THREAD * 151 * 21,726
    • ***Macwesties * Mon. Oct. 12, 2026 * Happy Thanksgiving "We the NORTH" * Week #5 * MNF * NFL Football Plays*** 3,672
    • I Thought Trump Campaigned on Lowering Prices!?!? 32,063
    • Week 5 6,531

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.