The games that this method chooses tonight are as follows:
NC State + 1.5![]()
Akron + 1.5![]()
Ill Chicago +15![]()
Other games of interest are the following.
Loyola Chi +4.5![]()
Wisc GB +6![]()
Penn State +7![]()
Wyoming +12
z
Purdue -9.5![]()
Shirley
The games that this method chooses tonight are as follows:
NC State + 1.5![]()
Akron + 1.5![]()
Ill Chicago +15![]()
Other games of interest are the following.
Loyola Chi +4.5![]()
Wisc GB +6![]()
Penn State +7![]()
Wyoming +12
z
Purdue -9.5![]()
Shirley
Oh wow wow wow. Glad I never got accepted to the country club. ![]()
Oh wow wow wow. Glad I never got accepted to the country club. ![]()
You weren't supposed to play all of those you nitwits.
You weren't supposed to play all of those you nitwits.
You weren't supposed to play all of those you nitwits.
Hahaha, you're absolutely right. I mean, this system isn't that hard. Some days there may not be many, or any, plays. If a Delta (or difference) of 4 or greater doesn't exist it's not a definite play. I will say, Shirley's recent form lines complicate things some, because the system was working just fine the way it was. I'm not totally sold on the idea of fixing what's not broken. She did, however, supply the lines according to overall ratings as well. What I did was average her line according to overall ratings with her recent form line and then take that number versus the actual line. In that case, the only play would have been NC State. And to her credit, she did warn that the line looked a little fishy.
Remember guys, these lines are there for you to reference. We should all have our own opinions on games. These should act as dealbreakers. For example, if I liked VA last night and then saw Shirley's line, I'm not sure I would abandon my gut and go with NC State. Her line's have been extremely valuable and contributed to some big days for me, but let's keep the human aspect alive in this whole thing.
Also, using her recent form lines, there were only 3 plays....Loy-Chi, Ill-Chi and Akron....they went 1-2 ATS. Nothing to lose your shirt over. You can't create plays where plays dont exist and then say the system doesn't work.
You weren't supposed to play all of those you nitwits.
Hahaha, you're absolutely right. I mean, this system isn't that hard. Some days there may not be many, or any, plays. If a Delta (or difference) of 4 or greater doesn't exist it's not a definite play. I will say, Shirley's recent form lines complicate things some, because the system was working just fine the way it was. I'm not totally sold on the idea of fixing what's not broken. She did, however, supply the lines according to overall ratings as well. What I did was average her line according to overall ratings with her recent form line and then take that number versus the actual line. In that case, the only play would have been NC State. And to her credit, she did warn that the line looked a little fishy.
Remember guys, these lines are there for you to reference. We should all have our own opinions on games. These should act as dealbreakers. For example, if I liked VA last night and then saw Shirley's line, I'm not sure I would abandon my gut and go with NC State. Her line's have been extremely valuable and contributed to some big days for me, but let's keep the human aspect alive in this whole thing.
Also, using her recent form lines, there were only 3 plays....Loy-Chi, Ill-Chi and Akron....they went 1-2 ATS. Nothing to lose your shirt over. You can't create plays where plays dont exist and then say the system doesn't work.
I dont know where to find her lines unless she posts them -- any ideas for today? I got lucky yesterday and only went with Loyola and NCSU so I split and knew better than to take the damn wolfpack so no one to blame but myself. I would like to see her lines for today though
I dont know where to find her lines unless she posts them -- any ideas for today? I got lucky yesterday and only went with Loyola and NCSU so I split and knew better than to take the damn wolfpack so no one to blame but myself. I would like to see her lines for today though
Hahaha, you're absolutely right. I mean, this system isn't that hard. Some days there may not be many, or any, plays. If a Delta (or difference) of 4 or greater doesn't exist it's not a definite play. I will say, Shirley's recent form lines complicate things some, because the system was working just fine the way it was. I'm not totally sold on the idea of fixing what's not broken. She did, however, supply the lines according to overall ratings as well. What I did was average her line according to overall ratings with her recent form line and then take that number versus the actual line. In that case, the only play would have been NC State. And to her credit, she did warn that the line looked a little fishy.
Remember guys, these lines are there for you to reference. We should all have our own opinions on games. These should act as dealbreakers. For example, if I liked VA last night and then saw Shirley's line, I'm not sure I would abandon my gut and go with NC State. Her line's have been extremely valuable and contributed to some big days for me, but let's keep the human aspect alive in this whole thing.
Also, using her recent form lines, there were only 3 plays....Loy-Chi, Ill-Chi and Akron....they went 1-2 ATS. Nothing to lose your shirt over. You can't create plays where plays dont exist and then say the system doesn't work.
Hahaha, you're absolutely right. I mean, this system isn't that hard. Some days there may not be many, or any, plays. If a Delta (or difference) of 4 or greater doesn't exist it's not a definite play. I will say, Shirley's recent form lines complicate things some, because the system was working just fine the way it was. I'm not totally sold on the idea of fixing what's not broken. She did, however, supply the lines according to overall ratings as well. What I did was average her line according to overall ratings with her recent form line and then take that number versus the actual line. In that case, the only play would have been NC State. And to her credit, she did warn that the line looked a little fishy.
Remember guys, these lines are there for you to reference. We should all have our own opinions on games. These should act as dealbreakers. For example, if I liked VA last night and then saw Shirley's line, I'm not sure I would abandon my gut and go with NC State. Her line's have been extremely valuable and contributed to some big days for me, but let's keep the human aspect alive in this whole thing.
Also, using her recent form lines, there were only 3 plays....Loy-Chi, Ill-Chi and Akron....they went 1-2 ATS. Nothing to lose your shirt over. You can't create plays where plays dont exist and then say the system doesn't work.
I dont know where to find her lines unless she posts them -- any ideas for today? I got lucky yesterday and only went with Loyola and NCSU so I split and knew better than to take the damn wolfpack so no one to blame but myself. I would like to see her lines for today though
I wouldn't mind seeing her lines either, unfortunately if they're not posted here, we are at a loss. Who do you guys like?
I got Pitt -10 and Weber State -13. Pitt coming off a loss against a scrappy and good 3-point shooting L'ville team. Should be able to bounce back strong against South Florida and win by DD's. Weber State is the dominant team. It's a home game for them and they have been destroying teams at home. 13 points is a lot, but E. Wash is brutal on the road. I'm hoping for a 20 point halftime lead.
Let's see if we can keep the ship afloat until Shirley comes back. Good Luck guys.
I dont know where to find her lines unless she posts them -- any ideas for today? I got lucky yesterday and only went with Loyola and NCSU so I split and knew better than to take the damn wolfpack so no one to blame but myself. I would like to see her lines for today though
I wouldn't mind seeing her lines either, unfortunately if they're not posted here, we are at a loss. Who do you guys like?
I got Pitt -10 and Weber State -13. Pitt coming off a loss against a scrappy and good 3-point shooting L'ville team. Should be able to bounce back strong against South Florida and win by DD's. Weber State is the dominant team. It's a home game for them and they have been destroying teams at home. 13 points is a lot, but E. Wash is brutal on the road. I'm hoping for a 20 point halftime lead.
Let's see if we can keep the ship afloat until Shirley comes back. Good Luck guys.
I like Duke as well. I'm a Duke fan though, and whenever I wager on them they blow the cover. Put them in a 3T 8Point teaser, though. Duke -4, Pitt -2, Weber -5. St. Bonny looks like a good pick, but I can't bring myself to pull the trigger. They burned me at Richmond last weekend and I haven't gotten over it. They were getting 10 or 11 that game. I do like Dayton as well, just haven't seen them play much so I'm hesitant. Good Luck EastCoast.
I like Duke as well. I'm a Duke fan though, and whenever I wager on them they blow the cover. Put them in a 3T 8Point teaser, though. Duke -4, Pitt -2, Weber -5. St. Bonny looks like a good pick, but I can't bring myself to pull the trigger. They burned me at Richmond last weekend and I haven't gotten over it. They were getting 10 or 11 that game. I do like Dayton as well, just haven't seen them play much so I'm hesitant. Good Luck EastCoast.
Definitely man. For example, I will never wager on Michigan State again in my life. Everytime I do, they score like 46 points for the game.
Definitely man. For example, I will never wager on Michigan State again in my life. Everytime I do, they score like 46 points for the game.
the line move because money live move, well time to move on, sorry about the earlier post Shirley, and thanks for the time that you've put in...Shit happen hahahaha
the line move because money live move, well time to move on, sorry about the earlier post Shirley, and thanks for the time that you've put in...Shit happen hahahaha
Shirley.............what happened to your "there's more value in over/unders than sides theory" you had a while back??????
that didn't work out very well for you did it??
now you're on to sides ATS........hmmmmmm
good luck with that......I have been reading your logic on lines. IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.
People here are following you blindly,........you're burning them ![]()
Shirley.............what happened to your "there's more value in over/unders than sides theory" you had a while back??????
that didn't work out very well for you did it??
now you're on to sides ATS........hmmmmmm
good luck with that......I have been reading your logic on lines. IT MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.
People here are following you blindly,........you're burning them ![]()
So, based on the 200% impact lines, the plays would be:
Lo-Chi +5
Ill-Chi +15.5
Pur - 8.5
Penn St +7 (maybe its close)
So, based on the 200% impact lines, the plays would be:
Lo-Chi +5
Ill-Chi +15.5
Pur - 8.5
Penn St +7 (maybe its close)

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.