All Forums | College Basketball

NCAAB TUES

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 17722
Posts: 173
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #76
why Wisc?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 41
Posted: #77
I love FSU in this rivalry game, I think FSU is a better road team then home team, perfect spot.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #78
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:

why Wisc?


Tough game for the ZAGS. They really had no way of scouting WISC last night due to the foul problems from both sides and neither team really got into the flow of the game. Not to mention the ZAGS had to sit around all day yesterday and all day today. They should really be stiff for this one. I think momentum is riding with WISC from pulling out that W in a physical yet sloppy game last night. Momentum is about everything in tourneys and I think WISC will build off that and make this another physical game just the way MICH ST made it to get back in the game and win. The size to match up and Bo Ryans ability to win big games will get it done here. WISC showed me also last night they are a little deeper off the bench than I thought they were.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 41
Posted: #79
Tailing you on the wisc. game also, great defensive home team, I think they'll suck the energy out of Gonzaga early.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 41623
Posted: #80
Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:



Tough game for the ZAGS. They really had no way of scouting WISC last night due to the foul problems from both sides and neither team really got into the flow of the game. Not to mention the ZAGS had to sit around all day yesterday and all day today. They should really be stiff for this one. I think momentum is riding with WISC from pulling out that W in a physical yet sloppy game last night. Momentum is about everything in tourneys and I think WISC will build off that and make this another physical game just the way MICH ST made it to get back in the game and win. The size to match up and Bo Ryans ability to win big games will get it done here. WISC showed me also last night they are a little deeper off the bench than I thought they were.


Thanks and good luck! Line is now up to 2 so you might be on the right side. I am took Wichita St at -1 now they are -3 what do you think?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #81
Quote Originally Posted by Professional1:



Thanks and good luck! Line is now up to 2 so you might be on the right side. I am took Wichita St at -1 now they are -3 what do you think?


Game is a toss up going to come down to who plays for 40 minutes. Whatever team hits a scoring drought which one of these teams will will lose this game. I think your on the right track though. Not enough for me to put a play out as either team could fade deep in the game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #82
Someone please talk me out of loading up big on TEXAS tonight!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2322
Posted: #83

Thought I would see COL on your card again today....Also on thoughts on Clev st......I like them to keep iy close.....im also likin wichita st, cincy and virginia....if you have time let me know your thoughts...BOL AND NICE RUN

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14259
Posted: #84
Ashton Gibbs and the backcourt will hold their own vs. UT. I think its a number that is right were it should be. Thye could lose by 6, or 10. It will come down to Foul shots IMO. By that, I mean Tex up, Pitt fouling, and IF thye make their shots and not
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 1528
Posted: #85

Quote Originally Posted by UNCforever:


Updated Card


CORNELL +15 (5U)

FSU +4 (5U)

WISC -1 (5U)



Looking at a couple others to round out the card. C'MON MAN!

I just want to jump in here cuz I am from Madison.  The Badgers are not a good team right now.  Gonzaga almost went into Michigan St and beat them, there is no way Bucky beats them on a neutral court.  I really really like Gonzaga tonight. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by gabs24:

Thought I would see COL on your card again today....Also on thoughts on Clev st......I like them to keep iy close.....im also likin wichita st, cincy and virginia....if you have time let me know your thoughts...BOL AND NICE RUN




CLE ST is depleted from what I remember reading them the other day. 4 seniors I think return but the rest is a bunch of new faces. UK is starting to hit stride I think but against shitty teams. Hard to say where they stand. Looking at this line no movement at all and UK is getting pounded. I think this is not a trap game I think with the line sitting like this is the only way to attract CLE ST money. My concern UK has lived at home so far and are now on neutral court. Hard to say how they play but if I played it I would play UK. Looks alot like the TEX line last night. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #87
Quote Originally Posted by bracks:

Ashton Gibbs and the backcourt will hold their own vs. UT. I think its a number that is right were it should be. Thye could lose by 6, or 10. It will come down to Foul shots IMO. By that, I mean Tex up, Pitt fouling, and IF thye make their shots and not


Enough to keep me off thank you sir.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 186
Posted: #88
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2322
Posted: #89

Quote Originally Posted by bracks:

Ashton Gibbs and the backcourt will hold their own vs. UT. I think its a number that is right were it should be. Thye could lose by 6, or 10. It will come down to Foul shots IMO. By that, I mean Tex up, Pitt fouling, and IF thye make their shots and not

I see what ur saying but I also think that they were asleep in the first half yesterday vs iowa letting them hang around and thinking they were going to walk all over them....i think they could have won by 40 last night if they played 2 halfs of basketball.....I do not think they will come out flat tonight...they will be ready to play and I can see them winning this one pretty easily....they simply out match pitt at casically every position and are a much deeper team....pitt will tire in this one and i think tx wins by 10+  just my 2 cents BOL

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #90
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:

I just want to jump in here cuz I am from Madison.  The Badgers are not a good team right now.  Gonzaga almost went into Michigan St and beat them, there is no way Bucky beats them on a neutral court.  I really really like Gonzaga tonight. 






Your boys are alot better then the way that game looked last night. MSU always starts slow you have to remember that. Izzo has a hard time getting his teams out of the gates early.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #91
Quote Originally Posted by Airmail26:

I just want to jump in here cuz I am from Madison.  The Badgers are not a good team right now.  Gonzaga almost went into Michigan St and beat them, there is no way Bucky beats them on a neutral court.  I really really like Gonzaga tonight. 




Also why are your boys favored tonight then?


I will take a shot that they get the win and finish it off late...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #92
Quote Originally Posted by gabs24:

I see what ur saying but I also think that they were asleep in the first half yesterday vs iowa letting them hang around and thinking they were going to walk all over them....i think they could have won by 40 last night if they played 2 halfs of basketball.....I do not think they will come out flat tonight...they will be ready to play and I can see them winning this one pretty easily....they simply out match pitt at casically every position and are a much deeper team....pitt will tire in this one and i think tx wins by 10+  just my 2 cents BOL




My thoughts exactly. TEX is the deepest team in the country yes there young but young with a lot of talent. PITT does not have the bodies for 40 minutes in this one. I really thought this line would be closer to 10. Maybe oddsmakers are still giving to much respect for PITT from last season. Hard to say..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2322
Posted: #93
I think a good question would be....WHAT IS KEEPING EVERYONE FROM UNLOADING ON WOFFORD TONIGHT???....Illinois is my team and I have watched them and been a huge fan for the last 10 years....I am an alum and my heart was crushed when we lost to your tarheels in the national title....This team is young...is raw....has lots of talent but hasnt been tested at all this year....I know all about there home court and how tough it is to play there but I also know that it is Thanksgiving break and that the Orange Crush will be limited tonight and it will not be the same atmospere tonight...Wofford returns there big 3 and are the frontrunners to win the Southern Conf this year...They have been off since the 13th giving them lots of time to prepare for this one....I really hope they do not upset my Illini but I think that they will have a chance...This one will be close throughout and I really think it is the best on the board...BOL
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 10199
Posted: #94
CORNELL & FSU... 

Liking Colorado as well.... take a look.  Arizona playing on short turnaround, lines seems way too low for this game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #95
Quote Originally Posted by special__k:

CORNELL & FSU... 

Liking Colorado as well.... take a look.  Arizona playing on short turnaround, lines seems way too low for this game.



There he is! Really hard for me to figure this one out. Saw one team play one fo there best games so far of the season and another one that looked like a JV team. I will stay away.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14259
Posted: #96

They could have won by a lot but why was Iowa still in it?

3pt FG in the 1st HF. Jamie Dixon saw that. Hawkeyes finished 10-37% 3pt (27%), and 31% FG. they were hitting in the 1st HF.

Now, PItt has not played a team as good as Tex, but, Wofford has shown they were no push over. Here are some of Pitts stats.

Gibbs- 42.9% 3pt, 50%FG, 81% FT.
Woodall- 30% 3pt

Pitt as a team- 34.8% 3pt, 48.5%FG

I trust Jamie Dixon to know how to find a way to play with Tex. I also trust Piit kids to never back down from anyone. They might not have the bodies to do it, but the have the fight.

Disclaimer- Gibbs went to my Prep school in Jersey, as did asst. Coach former Pitt player Brandon Knight, so I have a lil bias to them. BUt I have said from the beginning og the yr that Tex is def a Final 4 team, and I liked their odds to win it!!!

Just my .02

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 14259
Posted: #97
I am already on Wofford gabs- I said, I might be takign the bait, but I have made a lot of money off them already vs. Pitt and Bradley
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 12241
Posted: #98
UNC, check this out..

GONZAGA vs. WISCONSIN
GONZAGA: 10-3 ATS in November
WISCONSIN: 1-5 ATS on Tuesday nights
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 12241
Posted: #99
COLORADO vs. ARIZONA
COLORADO: 17-5 UNDER in November
ARIZONA: 23-10 UNDER in November
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 8280
Posted: #100
Quote Originally Posted by SiuLungBao:

UNC, check this out..

GONZAGA vs. WISCONSIN
GONZAGA: 10-3 ATS in November
WISCONSIN: 1-5 ATS on Tuesday nights



Good stuff but trends mean very little to me when capping a game. Dont forget these teams typically play much different competition.
All Forums | College Basketball
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.