Ncaab ATS Streak Breakers for 2013/2014

I need a good accountant are you avail 

moving this over due to page turn

big day today stevo , with you all the way on getting back some $$$ from the other nite. gl today everyone

thx stevo i sent you a pm

Thx Stevo need a good day on the big plays.

Boo tee is over 62 1 st h a play ?

just posted my first thread for MLB to get it started for ST

ESPN - I play 1st 10MIN of game! It's NOT first half, But OVER 1st 10 MIN!

BOO!

Would say "yes" but sometimes things slow down come the last 10 minutes of a first half! good li luck whatever u decide!

BOO!

Boo tee my local don't have it but did play over 62 1st h ...think if over 10 min should go over .. gl

ESPNTED -- > Good deal Brotha!!

Good call Boo! What's next?

haha maybe i should have been an accountant. but if u get a good plumber then im ur guy.

--- George Mason/St Louis - 1st 10 MIN OVER 30 --- capped at 32!! KEY NOTE: It opened at 29.5 @ - 120 -- it is now both OVER/UNDER even @ - 110 - another beauty - Pound OVER!!

NOTE: If u followed the whole first half of Marquette & St Johns - u will see exactly why I stay away from halves - what I told ESPN came to light - after 10 Min of play...game slowed way down - a great teaching lesson!

{13-4-1 on 1st 10 MIN Plays}

Good Luck - BOOYA!!

PLAYS TODAY  CORRECTED

So last game the bet was for ECU to cover now today it's for them not to cover.  Think it was supposed to be other way around 

i get it's a system but at some point you need to add some logic.  they will eventually cover a spread.  

this is shitty 

I thought ECU hasn' covered for awhile so it was due?

Stevo1 , you may need to make some adjustment, we are fu..c.k again today !!!!!

A few days ago the system called for ECU to cover and they got smoked. Today the system calls for them to not cover and they are winning SU. Again I get it's system play but it doesn't make much sense

what the hell is going on with these plays the last few days

they were the FIRST 0-8 team to cover for 2014

cancelling UCF

i have this theory but its hard to put into words, so im just gonna throw it out there and tell me what u think. stevo u have said before that the oddsmakers try to balance out the streak levels. for example they have the nba pretty solid with most streaks have a 50/50 win loss for most streaks whereas in the ncaa and nhl there are imbalanaces and u track the records until the imbalance is above 60% and then u strike. but i think u have also said that in the past 4 years u show records and compare to this year and show how the oddsmakers get better as the seasons progress. i haven't followed u until this year so im not as experienced with this as u but is it possible that theres a point where u peak, as the oddsmakers begin to balance things out. small example. 0-8 were 0-2 and now they are 1-2 and mmaybe by seasons end will be 3-3 as not many teams get to that streak level. larger example u have another streaks that's 10-2 i think and now 10-3 and by seasons end may be 10-10 and as right now ur percentage is high to play one side each week it might lose until ur percentage dips below 60% and then eventually is actually 50/50 or something close to that. the problem would be knowing when that steak has peaked. but i wonder if u went back in ur records u might find that from say dec 1st til late jan its safe to throw 10units on a steak that grows from 3-0 to 4-1 to 7-2 ect, but after feb its begins to make its way in the opposite direction in an effort to balance out. u track ur records from season start to season end but have u ever tracked from start to feb and then from feb til end and found they are mirror images of each other? im just thowing it out there, i been thinking. i don't have time to do the hard work u do and i appre ur work and i believe in it and im just trying to solve all our problems by thinking and thowing ideas and thoughts out there.