Holmey's $$$$ Thread - Post Your 1 $$$$ Play - 02.04.16

$$$$ play....NHL NJ vs TOR   Under 5

Been a Leaf fan my entire life and I have watched just about every Toronto game this year and the past years. Toronto simply does not have the talent to score in bunches. But they do have Reimer who sits second in save percentage (0.932) and 9th in goals against. Injury to JVR gives Toronto even less offense.

NJ starts C Schneider who sits 6th in save percentage (0.929) and 3rd in goals against. He has a 1.64 GAA against TOR in last 7 games. Injury to Cammeleri takes away some offense for the devils.

Under is 20-3-3 in last 26 meetings.

NJ doesn't light it up ranks 29th in goals for and 4th in goals against. I see both teams struggling to score in this one.

Two high percentage goalies who I feel wont see a lot of shots on net keep this one under.

$$$$ record 1-0

Thanks for the $$$$ POST, jimmy.  What is the number on that $$$$?  It needs to be -129 or less.  Make sure you include the ML number in the post.  Thanks!

Thanks for the idea, j-walk.  Covers told me to eliminate the word LOCK from all my threads, so I decided to call them $$$$ PLAYS rather than LOCKS.  I am going to stick with this for a little while, but, yes, you're right that using the cash symbol does not separate the thread well at all.  Its a work in progress and we'll see how it goes.  Thanks!

Sorry Holmey...will do from now on  -125 is number.

Thanks for getting this going!

No problem!  Thanks for the $$$$.  GL!

Has anyone anything online that would help explain why the USC line has dropped -5.5 to -4? It doesn't make sense to me unless there was a report of an injury illness.

What makes me nervous is that the line movement in the USC game is eerily reminiscent of the line movement yesterday against UW.  That made no sense to me and then I watched the best player in the Pac-12 play entire regulation looking like he was purposely throwing the game.  I am not a "this game is fixed guy", but had Andrews not woken the F up in OT last night, I would have had no option but to believe that he threw that game.  The guy leads the Pac-12 in scoring and he had 0 FG's and 4 turnovers in regulation.  He even stepped into the lane on a FT (it looked COMEPLETELY on purpose) that cost his team a point.

Anyone see ANYTHING about a USC injury or illness?  Thanks......

Don't over think this stuff Mr. Holmes...

*isn't that one of the tricks 'books' use to stop a blitz on a specific number... employing reverse line movement to make big $$$ stop n' stare long enough so that they miss what they came into the shop for...

Hope this helps

Hey BTW this game you got on here is absolutely delicious!

silver silver's take on GeoMason/Richmond total Under 149 yesterday was dead on handicapping...What happened at the end of the game was crazy.

Regards,

Thanks, 23.  Interesting take.  Its funny that the UW number inexplicably dropped at around the same time yesterday.  About 15 minutes later, Dickerson (UW's center) was listed as questionable, but I never thought he wasn't going to play.  Still, at least that made a little sense.  Still looking for an injury out of USC"s camp, but haven't seen one yet.  If either of USC's PG's were unable to play (McLaughlin & Jacobs), it would GREATLY affect the game.  Other than those two, USC has so much depth that they should be able to overcome any other injury.

Thanks for the insight.....

What makes me nervous is that the line movement in the USC game is eerily reminiscent of the line movement yesterday against UW.  That made no sense to me and then I watched the best player in the Pac-12 play entire regulation looking like he was purposely throwing the game.  I am not a "this game is fixed guy", but had Andrews not woken the F up in OT last night, I would have had no option but to believe that he threw that game.  The guy leads the Pac-12 in scoring and he had 0 FG's and 4 turnovers in regulation.  He even stepped into the lane on a FT (it looked COMEPLETELY on purpose) that cost his team a point.

Anyone see ANYTHING about a USC injury or illness?  Thanks......

I'm thinking the same thing for the IPFW/South Dakota game. I woke up this morning to see the line went from IPFW +1 to +2.5. The line change reminded of the IPFW/Neb Omaha game from Jan 16th. The total opened at 166 so I bet it over and eventually it went down to 162. I was shocked so I bet it again. The game finished at 106-101 in OT but it was 92-92 at regulation. 

Best to all.

PLEASE post your $$$$ PLAY even if it has already been posted, wgomel.  Everyone's insight and everyone's plays can all add up to a confident tail by anyone reading the thread.  When we start getting a lot of $$$$ PLAYS, we will start getting CONSENSUS PLAYS, where there are 4 or more $$$$'s on one team.  I encourage EVERYONE to post your $$$$ PLAY, regardless of what anyone else previously posted.  Duplicates are not a bad thing here......

$$$$ THREAD RESULTS AND STANDINGS THROUGH Feb. 3

Wednesday $$$$ W/L: 8-5
TOTAL W/L: 14-13

$$$$ Of The Night: wmi799 for St. Bonaventure (+6.5) who won outright

Brutal $$$$ Beat Of The Night: silversilver for the 25 points scored in the last 90 seconds to kill his under that was an easy winner at that point

STANDINGS:
I don't have the time nor space to post EVERYONE'S $$$$ record from here on out.  It will basically be a Leaderboard from this point forward.

1. BIG DOG (Leading $$$$-er): bubbaski27 (2-0)

2. All at 1-0
appleton40, Benzis, crownpeach, Da_Oracle, Desertcapper, FenwayFrank, MercyRules, USCHolmey, wmi799, Xdresser

12. All at 1-1
magiccarpetride, FREEBANDZ

Thanks guys and good luck today!