Cleveland Guardians Picks
3rd in American League Central
(58 - 59)
Next Game
Sat, Aug 8
19:15 ET
CLE @ CHW Picks
MLB Picks
Moneyline
Phil Naessens
Betting Analyst
Gavin Williams faces Anthony Kay in an evenly priced pick 'em spot. In their past 14 days, Cleveland holds a decisive edge in overall run prevention, boasting a 3.78 bullpen SIERA and a 25.8% strikeout rate compared to Chicago's 4.33 SIERA. With identical moneyline odds, trust the stronger pitching staff to pull it out.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
As far as temperature and humidity go, the 4th-best pitching weather on the schedule is expected for this game.. Despite posting a .384 wOBA this year, the leading projection system (THE BAT X) believes Munetaka Murakami has had positive variance on his side given the .038 deviation between that mark and his estimated true talent wOBA of .346.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
As far as temperature and humidity go, the 4th-best pitching weather on the schedule is expected for this game.. Colson Montgomery has taken a step back with his Barrel% lately; his 12.6% seasonal rate has dropped to 3.7% in the last two weeks.. Colson Montgomery's ability to hit the ball at a base hit-maximizing launch angle (between -4° and 26°) has decreased recently, decreasing from 36.7% on the season to 14.8% in the last 14 days.. Colson Montgomery has displayed poor plate discipline this year, checking in at the 17th percentile with a 3.68 K/BB rate.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
As far as temperature and humidity go, the 4th-best pitching weather on the schedule is expected for this game.. Hitting from the same side that Gavin Williams throws from, Miguel Vargas meets a tough challenge in today's matchup.. Grading out in the 7th percentile, Miguel Vargas sits with a .247 BABIP this year.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Rhys Hoskins in the 1st percentile when it comes to his BABIP ability.. Rhys Hoskins has primarily hit in the top-half of the batting order this season (90% of the time), but he is penciled in 6th in the lineup in today's game.. When starting against a lefty hurler this year, Rhys Hoskins has been replaced by a pinch-hitter 27% of the time.. As far as temperature and humidity go, the 4th-best pitching weather on the schedule is expected for this game.. Rhys Hoskins will be at a disadvantage playing as a visiting player in today's matchup.
Total Bases
AG
Angel Genao o1.5 Total Bases (+205)
Projection 1.33
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT) profiles Guaranteed Rate Field as the 8th-best stadium in baseball for RHB batting average.. Angel Genao pulls a lot of his flyballs (34.1% — 77th percentile) and sets up very well considering he'll be hitting them towards the game's 5th-shallowest LF fences in today's game.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Jo Adell in the 92nd percentile when assessing his home run ability.. Jo Adell is penciled in 4th on the lineup card in this matchup.. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-smallest outfield among all major league stadiums — generally good for HRs.. Given Anthony Kay's large platoon split, Jo Adell will have a colossal advantage batting from the opposite side of the plate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Andy Fletcher projects as a Hitters Umpire and is expected to be behind the plate in this game.. Guaranteed Rate Field ranks as the #27 field in Major League Baseball for strikeouts, via the leading projection system (THE BAT).. The Chicago White Sox have 7 bats in the projected offense that will hold the platoon advantage over Gavin Williams in this game.. Gavin Williams will be at a disadvantage playing away from home today.. Gavin Williams has experienced some positive variance in regards to his strikeouts this year, compiling an 11.53 K/9 despite the leading projection system (THE BAT) estimating his true talent level to be 10.97 — a 0.56 K/9 disparity.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Jo Adell in the 92nd percentile when assessing his home run ability.. Jo Adell is penciled in 4th on the lineup card in this matchup.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) profiles Guaranteed Rate Field as the 8th-best stadium in baseball for RHB batting average.. Guaranteed Rate Field has the 4th-smallest outfield among all major league stadiums — generally good for HRs.. Given Anthony Kay's large platoon split, Jo Adell will have a colossal advantage batting from the opposite side of the plate today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Colson Montgomery projects as the 16th-best home run batter in Major League Baseball, per the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Colson Montgomery is projected to hit 4th on the lineup card today.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) profiles Guaranteed Rate Field as the 8th-best ballpark in the game for left-handed batting average.. Batting from the opposite that Gavin Williams throws from, Colson Montgomery will have an advantage today.. Colson Montgomery pulls a high percentage of his flyballs (39.8% — 97th percentile) and has the good fortune of hitting them towards baseball's 9th-shallowest RF fences in today's game.
Consensus Picks
More ConsensusCLE @ CHW · Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.08%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.95%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Ramirez
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-12.94%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.62
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
12.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.69
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.85
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.82%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
R. Hoskins
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.67
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.37%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.81%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.71
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. Rocchio
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.28%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. DeLauter
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
17.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Kwan
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.01
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.61%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.41%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Martinez
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.35%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Ramirez
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.75%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.62%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.97%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.09%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
G. Williams
(SP)
7.5 Strikeouts Thrown
7.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Kay
(RP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.42%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.45%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.34%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.57%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.03%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
S. Kwan
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-8.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Adell
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.38
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
13.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
11.06%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
7.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.96%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Romo
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.23%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.64%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.63%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-8.09%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
9.95%
EV
TOTAL HITS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.92
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
2.89%
EV
TOTAL HITS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.67
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.78%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.97%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.09%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.08%
EV
TOTAL HITS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.16%
EV
TOTAL HITS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Hits
0.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.75%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.95%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-6.03%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
1.02
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-6.75%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-6.82%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Ramirez
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
1.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-12.94%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.62
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
12.7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.69
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
10.54%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.85
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
8.82%
EV
TOTAL BASES
R. Hoskins
(1B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.67
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
8.74%
EV
TOTAL BASES
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.33
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.37%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
6.81%
EV
TOTAL BASES
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Total Bases
0.71
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.7%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
6.41%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. Rocchio
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.29
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
5.28%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. DeLauter
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
3.59%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
1.34%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
17.76%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Kwan
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.01
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-1.61%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.04
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-3.41%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.23
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.06%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Martinez
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-4.35%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Ramirez
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-4.75%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.07
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.19%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.17
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-5.62%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Peters
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.78%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
S. Antonacci
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-5.97%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.09
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.07%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.09%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.63%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
G. Williams
(SP)
7.5 Strikeouts Thrown
7.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
9.63%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
A. Kay
(RP)
3.5 Strikeouts Thrown
3.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
5.68%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Adell
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
17.7%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.51%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.43
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
15.42%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
13.45%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.55
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.71%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.4%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.51
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
11.34%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.39
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
8.57%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.03%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Romo
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
7.64%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.36
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.91%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
S. Kwan
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.86%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.25
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-8.01%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Adell
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.38
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
13.99%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.82
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
13.68%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
R. Hoskins
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
11.06%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(1B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.80
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
9.59%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
A. Benintendi
(DH)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.57
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
7.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. DeLauter
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
7.01%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
AG
A. Genao
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.70
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.96%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Romo
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.21
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
1.39%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Rocchio
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.23%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. Montgomery
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.44
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-0.64%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Peters
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-1.63%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.31
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-8.09%
EV