How you can tell a Straight game from a Vegas trap game?
there was a capper, hitterno24, most his play were trap game plays, and I don't think he's had a losing year. I haven't seen him post this year.
It doesn't always work. I'd say it work 66% of the time, enough to squeak out a profit by the end of the season.
there was a capper, hitterno24, most his play were trap game plays, and I don't think he's had a losing year. I haven't seen him post this year.
It doesn't always work. I'd say it work 66% of the time, enough to squeak out a profit by the end of the season.
Every day there is a commission called LVSC and they are the ones who consult the books about the lines and odds. Why they and not someone else? Because they're closely connected as with the pro sports governing bodies as MLB, NBA, NFL , NHL WNBA etc and the books. Since the Pro sports bodies have one goal only - making more profit every year and they know that without sports betting the interest in games will be lower - they cooperate closely with books through LVSC. So, the games are seaprated ona daily bases between the "let it go as it such is" (LIGASIS) and "special treatment" (ST). The weight of ST can never succeed over 25%. Both sides win: the Books know which games to entrtapment and the PSGB (Pro Sports Governing Bodies) create an extra interest, rating and thus revenues from advertising, merchandising etc.
Every day there is a commission called LVSC and they are the ones who consult the books about the lines and odds. Why they and not someone else? Because they're closely connected as with the pro sports governing bodies as MLB, NBA, NFL , NHL WNBA etc and the books. Since the Pro sports bodies have one goal only - making more profit every year and they know that without sports betting the interest in games will be lower - they cooperate closely with books through LVSC. So, the games are seaprated ona daily bases between the "let it go as it such is" (LIGASIS) and "special treatment" (ST). The weight of ST can never succeed over 25%. Both sides win: the Books know which games to entrtapment and the PSGB (Pro Sports Governing Bodies) create an extra interest, rating and thus revenues from advertising, merchandising etc.
Odds-makers know they can't make EVERY shady line cash in their direction however. It would be too easy of a pattern for us to pick up on and just bet against it. They don't want to condition us to correctly avoid the trap. So they're smart..after raping the public on a couple shady lines, they'll throw a gift back out to the public...a line that looks too easy but it really is just an easy play. They minimize their losses on these gifts because they know the psyche of a gambler...after getting burned on a couple shady lines the gambling public will hesitate to take the bait again. And then when the easy pick hits, J.Q. gambler has a sigh of relief and says to himself "see, I do know what I'm doing. I just got unlucky in those other losses". And he'll line up at the ticket window to step on the next land mine.
Telling the real traps from what I call the fake traps isn't easy. In general though if you've noticed the public getting killed on a couple shady lines in a row, go ahead and bet the next play that looks too easy because it's likely the gift back to the public. And if that easy play hits, go ahead and go opposite of the easy play the next time or two. I made a nice profit in college hoops last season doing this. I wasn't always right and you can definitely over-think things, but I enjoy a challenge and have fun trying to figure them out
Good luck
Odds-makers know they can't make EVERY shady line cash in their direction however. It would be too easy of a pattern for us to pick up on and just bet against it. They don't want to condition us to correctly avoid the trap. So they're smart..after raping the public on a couple shady lines, they'll throw a gift back out to the public...a line that looks too easy but it really is just an easy play. They minimize their losses on these gifts because they know the psyche of a gambler...after getting burned on a couple shady lines the gambling public will hesitate to take the bait again. And then when the easy pick hits, J.Q. gambler has a sigh of relief and says to himself "see, I do know what I'm doing. I just got unlucky in those other losses". And he'll line up at the ticket window to step on the next land mine.
Telling the real traps from what I call the fake traps isn't easy. In general though if you've noticed the public getting killed on a couple shady lines in a row, go ahead and bet the next play that looks too easy because it's likely the gift back to the public. And if that easy play hits, go ahead and go opposite of the easy play the next time or two. I made a nice profit in college hoops last season doing this. I wasn't always right and you can definitely over-think things, but I enjoy a challenge and have fun trying to figure them out
Good luck
Starting with NCAA basketball last season, I've tried paying particular attention to "shady lines". The lines that just don't add up and look too easy. I've noticed the same trend in baseball. From what I can tell, roughly 2 out of 3 shady lines are traps. So most of the time if it looks too easy, it is.
Odds-makers know they can't make EVERY shady line cash in their direction however. It would be too easy of a pattern for us to pick up on and just bet against it. They don't want to condition us to correctly avoid the trap. So they're smart..after raping the public on a couple shady lines, they'll throw a gift back out to the public...a line that looks too easy but it really is just an easy play. They minimize their losses on these gifts because they know the psyche of a gambler...after getting burned on a couple shady lines the gambling public will hesitate to take the bait again. And then when the easy pick hits, J.Q. gambler has a sigh of relief and says to himself "see, I do know what I'm doing. I just got unlucky in those other losses". And he'll line up at the ticket window to step on the next land mine.
Telling the real traps from what I call the fake traps isn't easy. In general though if you've noticed the public getting killed on a couple shady lines in a row, go ahead and bet the next play that looks too easy because it's likely the gift back to the public. And if that easy play hits, go ahead and go opposite of the easy play the next time or two. I made a nice profit in college hoops last season doing this. I wasn't always right and you can definitely over-think things, but I enjoy a challenge and have fun trying to figure them out
Good luck
Starting with NCAA basketball last season, I've tried paying particular attention to "shady lines". The lines that just don't add up and look too easy. I've noticed the same trend in baseball. From what I can tell, roughly 2 out of 3 shady lines are traps. So most of the time if it looks too easy, it is.
Odds-makers know they can't make EVERY shady line cash in their direction however. It would be too easy of a pattern for us to pick up on and just bet against it. They don't want to condition us to correctly avoid the trap. So they're smart..after raping the public on a couple shady lines, they'll throw a gift back out to the public...a line that looks too easy but it really is just an easy play. They minimize their losses on these gifts because they know the psyche of a gambler...after getting burned on a couple shady lines the gambling public will hesitate to take the bait again. And then when the easy pick hits, J.Q. gambler has a sigh of relief and says to himself "see, I do know what I'm doing. I just got unlucky in those other losses". And he'll line up at the ticket window to step on the next land mine.
Telling the real traps from what I call the fake traps isn't easy. In general though if you've noticed the public getting killed on a couple shady lines in a row, go ahead and bet the next play that looks too easy because it's likely the gift back to the public. And if that easy play hits, go ahead and go opposite of the easy play the next time or two. I made a nice profit in college hoops last season doing this. I wasn't always right and you can definitely over-think things, but I enjoy a challenge and have fun trying to figure them out
Good luck
But when I saw the line for the Braves/Mets game a couple nights ago, I pounded the Mets and didn't think twice about it, especially after the public won the previous Sunday night game.
But when I saw the line for the Braves/Mets game a couple nights ago, I pounded the Mets and didn't think twice about it, especially after the public won the previous Sunday night game.
Every Sunday night game, go opposite of the play. The Mets game was the perfect trap for the Braves chasers. I was very interested in this game, and picked the Mets in a pick'em thing I do for fun. But I didn't lay the first unit on this game. Sunday night always reeks of trap.
Every Sunday night game, go opposite of the play. The Mets game was the perfect trap for the Braves chasers. I was very interested in this game, and picked the Mets in a pick'em thing I do for fun. But I didn't lay the first unit on this game. Sunday night always reeks of trap.
straight games: they're straight alright.
trap games: nonsense
straight games: they're straight alright.
trap games: nonsense
.....................................................
i admit defeat, you win.
.....................................................
i admit defeat, you win.
The surrest way to identify a so-called "trap line" is to create your own line.....
compare the two and bet when there is +EV
....pretty simple, actually
The surrest way to identify a so-called "trap line" is to create your own line.....
compare the two and bet when there is +EV
....pretty simple, actually
The surrest way to identify a so-called "trap line" is to create your own line.....
compare the two and bet when there is +EV
....pretty simple, actually
How dare you bring logic into this thread. ![]()
Really, people, if there was anything to this, someone would have invented a way to exploit a LONG time ago. Seen many, many "fade the public" losers come and go on this forum. None of them ever stick around long because it just doesn't work.
When will people ever come to terms that there are no short cuts. ![]()
The surrest way to identify a so-called "trap line" is to create your own line.....
compare the two and bet when there is +EV
....pretty simple, actually
How dare you bring logic into this thread. ![]()
Really, people, if there was anything to this, someone would have invented a way to exploit a LONG time ago. Seen many, many "fade the public" losers come and go on this forum. None of them ever stick around long because it just doesn't work.
When will people ever come to terms that there are no short cuts. ![]()
How dare you bring logic into this thread. ![]()
Really, people, if there was anything to this, someone would have invented a way to exploit a LONG time ago. Seen many, many "fade the public" losers come and go on this forum. None of them ever stick around long because it just doesn't work.
When will people ever come to terms that there are no short cuts. ![]()
How dare you bring logic into this thread. ![]()
Really, people, if there was anything to this, someone would have invented a way to exploit a LONG time ago. Seen many, many "fade the public" losers come and go on this forum. None of them ever stick around long because it just doesn't work.
When will people ever come to terms that there are no short cuts. ![]()
One other thing..if it's going to be a game that draws heavy action, like a nationally televised Sunday night game, and the line looks too easy, go the opposite way.
I think you're over simplifying it. I've studied lines for about a year and half and have probably put over 200+ hours into analyzing the trends in vegas payouts and vegas rakes. It's situational, and won't be as obvious as your +200 Texas idea you conjured up. I've had several people who put about 5 minutes of thought into it up against my hundreds of hours of research tell me I'm crazy.
The idea that vegas is inducing action on the games they'll make the most profit on isn't that much of a stretch, is it?
Believe what you want to believe and do what works for you. I'm doing what works for me, and doing well at it. BOL
One other thing..if it's going to be a game that draws heavy action, like a nationally televised Sunday night game, and the line looks too easy, go the opposite way.
I think you're over simplifying it. I've studied lines for about a year and half and have probably put over 200+ hours into analyzing the trends in vegas payouts and vegas rakes. It's situational, and won't be as obvious as your +200 Texas idea you conjured up. I've had several people who put about 5 minutes of thought into it up against my hundreds of hours of research tell me I'm crazy.
The idea that vegas is inducing action on the games they'll make the most profit on isn't that much of a stretch, is it?
Believe what you want to believe and do what works for you. I'm doing what works for me, and doing well at it. BOL
This is an example of what I'm talking about.
This is an example of what I'm talking about.
This thread ![]()
The old trap theory hahahahahah..... how about they know way more than you. The lines makers are not dumb like you either. I guess the braves were never gonna lose again? Public perception makes it easy for Vegas to set lines.
This thread ![]()
The old trap theory hahahahahah..... how about they know way more than you. The lines makers are not dumb like you either. I guess the braves were never gonna lose again? Public perception makes it easy for Vegas to set lines.
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
