Posted:
#2276
Mavin...keep up the goof work.
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
Posted:
#2279
according to my data. the last three games tonight are all dogs.
DAL, SAC, and ORL. either win our right or win by point spread
my data support all yesterday games (sunday) I will explain if needed. I am just trying to help . I am looking at a different
angle . hopefully combine of what we learn here to increase the odds of winning
Posted:
#2280
Quote Originally Posted by eargasm:
according to my data. the last three games tonight are all dogs.
Pease explain your system. How far back is it tracked this season? Any season record?
according to my data. the last three games tonight are all dogs.
DAL, SAC, and ORL. either win our right or win by point spread
my data support all yesterday games (sunday) I will explain if needed. I am just trying to help . I am looking at a different
angle . hopefully combine of what we learn here to increase the odds of winning
Posted:
#2281
Quote Originally Posted by eargasm:
according to my data. the last three games tonight are all dogs.
according to my data. the last three games tonight are all dogs.
DAL, SAC, and ORL. either win our right or win by point spread
my data support all yesterday games (sunday) I will explain if needed. I am just trying to help . I am looking at a different
angle . hopefully combine of what we learn here to increase the odds of winning
This thread supports explanations
Posted:
#2283
OK, Still working on my line movement reading abilities.
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
Posted:
#2284
Quote Originally Posted by Paul76:
OK, Still working on my line movement reading abilities.
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
OK, Still working on my line movement reading abilities.
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
Orlando played 7 straight Overs. At that stage I usually wait for first Under to start riding Unders after that. I would not risk touching the totals in a game where evidently the big money has been thrown on both sides by how I read the line movement throughout the day
Posted:
#2288
Quote Originally Posted by Paul76:
OK, Still working on my line movement reading abilities.
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
OK, Still working on my line movement reading abilities.
Is something screwy going on with the totals in the Portland/Orlando game. If I'm reading this correctly starting line was 191.5, Caesars and LVH opened at 190.5, line is up to 191.5 at C and 192 at LVH but 62% of the money is with the under. Trying to draw an over bet so the logical conclusion is to take the under. How am I doing so far??
I see even money on total thus far.
Posted:
#2296
Quote Originally Posted by Actiz0l:
will you decipher the SAC - Memphis game ? I want to understand your picks.
Thanks in advance.
will you decipher the SAC - Memphis game ? I want to understand your picks.
Thanks in advance.
Very simple for me. The public is all over the Memphis because the line is so short. And what happens next" It shortens more. Next - more public is on the Grizzlies. LVSC released the line at Memphis -4. The books doctored it -4.5 most probably anticipating the public pounding the Grizzlies heavy. Once that happened they went for another wave of the public lowering it to -3.5. That can happen either how I described or with the help of money on the Kings. I'll accept it any way it happened as for me it say the same. As long as the Kings and the Grizzlies will continue to split home and homes and the Grizzlies will keep akternating wins and losses - this is even the Kings winning outright. But I will take the points and will hope that my read of the Kings winning the first half or the game or both will be correct one. In all previous scenarios of this kind on Mondays when OKC is finally fulfilling it's wet dream of laying down at ease without Harden spoiling it and SA playing on opiods - this play si alright for me
Posted:
#2298
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Orlando played 7 straight Overs. At that stage I usually wait for first Under to start riding Unders after that. I would not risk touching the totals in a game where evidently the big money has been thrown on both sides by how I read the line movement throughout the day
Thanks Mavin, adding to my notes regarding waiting for a trend to finish and then look to go the other way. Seems like I read the line movement the wrong way again. Just to check did you see it as more money for the under than the over?
Cheers
Posted:
#2300
Quote Originally Posted by Paul76:
Thanks Mavin, adding to my notes regarding waiting for a trend to finish and then look to go the other way. Seems like I read the line movement the wrong way again. Just to check did you see it as more money for the under than the over?
Cheers
Thanks Mavin, adding to my notes regarding waiting for a trend to finish and then look to go the other way. Seems like I read the line movement the wrong way again. Just to check did you see it as more money for the under than the over?
Cheers
I said, it must have been on both sides. How much? I can not know that. I doubt the books know till the game tip off
Hot Forum Topics
