Posted:
#4676
lol amazing comes to a 50 pt qt needed.
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
Posted:
#4677
Quote Originally Posted by dexterjau3:
January 21 RECAP
New York Knicks -3.5 - $115 loss
New Orleans Hornets -6.5 - $100 win
UNDER Grizzlies 173 - $100 win
UNDER Bulls 49 1Q - $71 win
Days result: 3-1 +$156
YTD: 21-11-2 +$801
January 21 RECAP
New York Knicks -3.5 - $115 loss
New Orleans Hornets -6.5 - $100 win
UNDER Grizzlies 173 - $100 win
UNDER Bulls 49 1Q - $71 win
Days result: 3-1 +$156
YTD: 21-11-2 +$801
January 22 RECAP
UNDER Bucks 49.5 1Q - $200 win
UNDER Cavaliers 49 1Q - $119 loss
Los Angeles Clippers +0.5 3Q - $81 loss
Days result: 1-2 +$0
YTD: 21-13-2 +$801
YTD: 21-13-2 +$801
Posted:
#4688
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:
I really hope he gets the over but have OKC -2 and ML on parlays
I really hope he gets the over but have OKC -2 and ML on parlays
PARLAY (10 TEAMS)
( Risking: 1.00 - To Win: 642.08 )
01/22/2013
07:15 PM
NBA
[502] CLEVELAND +4½-110 -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
07:15 PM
NBA
[502] TOTAL u190-110 (BOSTON vrs CLEVELAND)-------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
07:45 PM
NBA
[504] DETROIT -4½-110 -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
07:45 PM
NBA
[504] TOTAL u195½-110 (ORLANDO vrs DETROIT) -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
08:15 PM
NBA
[506] MILWAUKEE -6½-110 -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
08:15 PM
NBA
[505] TOTAL o195½-110 (PHILADELPHIA vrs MILWAUKEE) -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
10:35 PM
NBA
[507] OKLAHOMA CITY -2-110 -------------------> WIN
01/22/2013
10:35 PM
NBA
[507] TOTAL o201½-110 (OKLAHOMA CITY vrs LA CLIPPERS) -------------------> WIN
01/23/2013
08:05 PM
NBA
[711] LA LAKERS +3½-110
01/23/2013
10:05 PM
NBA
[719] TOTAL o202½-110 (PHOENIX vrs SACRAMENTO)
Again I hope I hit this but its really still testing my past perf of hitting more than half on 8 to 10 team parlays. Was late to my pick 3 of my 10 to play so I played the second half of the bucks game will post that after this...
8-10 two more to go-
Posted:
#4689
Quote Originally Posted by Turbovtk:
What sucks about already hitting 6 of the 10 is that 2 of my fav have yet to happen so that makes me think I will miss one-
What sucks about already hitting 6 of the 10 is that 2 of my fav have yet to happen so that makes me think I will miss one-
$50 for $929
|
||||||||||||||
3-5 two to go
Posted:
#4691
I think it has been more luck than skill lately Mavin..you have been posting without any write-ups, no reasoning, and you have been posting far before the gametime without any view of the line movement or anything else. Take your time, do the research, and make your picks accordingly and you will be back to your starting roll
Posted:
#4693
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
I think it has been more luck than skill lately Mavin..you have been posting without any write-ups, no reasoning, and you have been posting far before the gametime without any view of the line movement or anything else. Take your time, do the research, and make your picks accordingly and you will be back to your starting roll
I think it has been more luck than skill lately Mavin..you have been posting without any write-ups, no reasoning, and you have been posting far before the gametime without any view of the line movement or anything else. Take your time, do the research, and make your picks accordingly and you will be back to your starting roll
I saw his picks earlier and did not see a write up but I had my mind made up after the OT loss on which OKC led in OT i thought they come with the thunder- no pun intended. Also the clippers fading yesterday late in the game did not inspire me and then paul was out- and they won games without him but that was not going to last- I thought that Paul out would also increase the under thats because while he gives better shot opp to his team mates he also likes to slow down the game and control the clock - I did not see this happen today.
The over was looking shady with OKC shooting 20% from the field- then KD took over- It was too close for comfort but it worked out.
As for me getting close to completing the parlays- have other with open spots hope to get them all to just 1 to go so that I can hedge one of them-
Posted:
#4694
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:
I think it has been more luck than skill lately Mavin..you have been posting without any write-ups, no reasoning, and you have been posting far before the gametime without any view of the line movement or anything else. Take your time, do the research, and make your picks accordingly and you will be back to your starting roll
I think it has been more luck than skill lately Mavin..you have been posting without any write-ups, no reasoning, and you have been posting far before the gametime without any view of the line movement or anything else. Take your time, do the research, and make your picks accordingly and you will be back to your starting roll
Thanks for your concern CM, but I can assure you I do not guess the outcomes of the games but handicap them real hard. When I post early picks (only happened 3 times) it is because I have those games and their outcomes marked earlier and circled in my notes as the results of the noting the details convincing me about the outcome. In other words - spot plays for me. And if you're talking about luck - I'd rather been unlucky than lucky outcome wise lately. Otherwise I would not have to grind out so much for so long. Thanks as always in your constructive criticism especially on the heels of a winning day as I also believe it should be done (I'm not being sarcastic or cynical) 
Posted:
#4698
As promised, here are the stats I've collated this past few days
MONDAY (1/21)
- Martin Luther King's day - HOLIDAY
- Monday was said to be a FAVE day, but since it's a HOLIDAY, I deemed it more fit to the weekend trend of DOGS and FADES day.
FAVES to DOGS (ATS ONLY)
7-1-1
PUBLIC to FADES (ATS ONLY)
7-1-1
TUESDAY (1/22)
- Said to be a FAVE day.
- Let's see the trend...
FAVES to DOGS (ATS ONLY)
3-1
PUBLIC to FADES (ATS ONLY)
3-1
WEDNESDAY
- Said to be a DOGS and FADES day.
- For all the expert pick lurkers out there, expert picks last Wednesday turned out 0-3
- here are my picks and short write ups
DEN@HOU -2.0
pk - DEN +2.0 (2u)
This is not my write up but damn I've got to share this one. Really well written. Go see for yourself. This is from "swolesbee"
"These are the top 2 teams in the NBA as far as pace goes. Transition is the name of their game for them. Neither team has much of an offensive post presence and neither team is very effective in a halfcourt setting. The difference here is that Denver has very good transition defense(5th in the NBA), Houston does not(26th). When both teams have to run some offense Denver actually is more effective than Houston (I will rarely ever get to say that about Denver). If Houston can't score on the break all they do is try to break a team down off the dribble(Iso plays with Harden), or they run a pick n roll. They really don't have any threats with the roll man and most of their pick n rolls or pick n pops are designed for the ball carrier(Harden or Lin) to get their own shot. Teams are starting to figure this out though and as a result the Houston offense is really struggling lately. Denver matches up-very well because as I mentioned they play great transition defense but also because they are really good at defending the ball handler in the pickn roll. They are top 6 in the NBA in all 3 of these phases: transition defense, isolation plays, and defending the pick n roll ball handler.
Denver also has 2 other HUGE advantages.
Bench play and offensive rebounding. Denver doesn't have a low post presence per-say but they are the best offensive rebounding team in the league. Last game Faried alone had 9 offensive rebounds lol. This in my opinion could be the difference as Houston has nobody on their roster capable of keeping Faried of the boards. Denver has the 6th best bench in the league, Houston has the 20th. Denver will bring Andre Miller, Corey Brewer, Wilson Chandler, and Javale Mcgee off the bench. Houston brings Toney Douglas, Patrick Beverley(d-league call up), Markus Morris, Greg Smith, and Delfino off the bench.
The way to beat Denver is to slow the pace down, make them play half court offense, box out their bigs, and attack them with a low post presence. Houston absolutely has no chance at doing any of that."
https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=22&sub=101539315&page=1
- I also noticed that the Reverse Line Theory is applicable in this one. Public pounding on HOU, and the line moved from -2.5 to -2.0 still in favor of HOU. hmmm.. Reverse Line Theory tallied (in my personal notes) at 10-4. Took DEN right away.
CONT. ON ANOTHER PAGE...
Posted:
#4699
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Thanks for your concern CM, but I can assure you I do not guess the outcomes of the games but handicap them real hard. When I post early picks (only happened 3 times) it is because I have those games and their outcomes marked earlier and circled in my notes as the results of the noting the details convincing me about the outcome. In other words - spot plays for me. And if you're talking about luck - I'd rather been unlucky than lucky outcome wise lately. Otherwise I would not have to grind out so much for so long. Thanks as always in your constructive criticism especially on the heels of a winning day as I also believe it should be done (I'm not being sarcastic or cynical)
I knew exactly what you were doin especially when you had no SA play for 2H
Keep it rockin Mavin 
Posted:
#4700
Quote Originally Posted by newty25:
It's too bad CP didn't play last night. I really would have like to have seen whether that would have made a big difference. I suspect not since the Clippers were terrible from the line and awful at 3 pointers.
It's too bad CP didn't play last night. I really would have like to have seen whether that would have made a big difference. I suspect not since the Clippers were terrible from the line and awful at 3 pointers.
Basically, it became Griffin against the Thunder.
Ya, pretty poor showing by the clips
Hot Forum Topics
