Posted:
#4601
okla ml
MAVIN OKLA ML
MAVIN OKLA ML
Has anyone made any money betting on sports steadily throughout the past year? 'cause I did! See how
Posted:
#4603
Sorry Mavin, I going to have to go with OKC on this one. Both teams are coming off a loss, and OKC has responded well all year after defeat where as the Clips seem to be a flat after a loss. Especially when losing to GS, they lost to Clev straight up, and only cover by a half point against an injured Lakers team. The fatigue factor comes in for the clips too, b2b, 3 in 4 nights, 4 in 6 nights. OKC has had one day rest, and they play at their peak on one day of rest.
Posted:
#4606
Final Picks for NBA Tuesday(5-2 yesterday) and Key Trends
Celtics -4.5
Boston lost last road game
Cleveland won last home game
Clev. 4-12 ATS at home
Clev 3-8 ATS as home dog
Orl +5
Orl lost last road game and home game
Det won last home game
Orl 12-4-1 ATS as an road dog
Det 4-10 ATS after a win
Det 3-8 ATS as a home fav
Det 9-14 ATS on 1 day of rest
Det has Chicago on deck
Mil -7
Mil 7-6 ATS as home fav
Mil 5-4 ATS on 2-3 days rest
Mil 17-8 in conf. games
Mil lost last home game
Phi 9-14 ATS after a loss
Phi 6-11 ATS as a road dog
Phi 2-9 ATS on no rest
Phi playing 3rd game in 4th night
Okc -1
Okc lost last road game
Okc 6-2 ATS after a loss
Okc 17-8-1 ATS on 1 day of rest
Okc 14-8-2 in conf. games
Lac won last home game
Lac 3-6 ATS after a loss
Lac 4-5 ATS on no rest
Lac 3rd game in 4th night, 4th game in 6th night
Those are some of my reasonings for my plays.
ty and gl to all...
Posted:
#4607
I hate to fade any pick of Marvin's but zero rest plays a huge factor in the outcome of games, especially with overtime games. For some reason, that extra 5 minutes really wears a team down.
I rarely ever bet on a team with zero rest and this doesn't seem like the opportune time to go against that rule.
Posted:
#4610
Quote Originally Posted by newty25:
I hate to fade any pick of Marvin's but zero rest plays a huge factor in the outcome of games, especially with overtime games. For some reason, that extra 5 minutes really wears a team down.
I hate to fade any pick of Marvin's but zero rest plays a huge factor in the outcome of games, especially with overtime games. For some reason, that extra 5 minutes really wears a team down.
I rarely ever bet on a team with zero rest and this doesn't seem like the opportune time to go against that rule.
Bulls played 3 OT games in a row and still beat Lakers.. I don't think this is the best theory to follow, but BOL with your picks man 
Posted:
#4611
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
Some early finals for tomorrow
Some early finals for tomorrow
Final:
Over 201.5 LA Clippers - OKC Thunder (-110) 220$
LA Clippers -1 (-110) 110$
MILWAUKEE Bucks -7 (-110) 220$
SportsMavin,
Are you a bit concerned that all your picks are now going the opposite line movements?
LAC/OKC over/under 200
LAC +1
Milwaukee -6.5
Posted:
#4614
Quote Originally Posted by TLProps:
Bulls played 3 OT games in a row and still beat Lakers.. I don't think this is the best theory to follow, but BOL with your picks man
I meant fading a team on zero rest that just played on OT game, but I was mistaken... the game yesterday didn't go into OT.
I almost never bet on a team with zero rest and love to fade them. That said, if both teams were rested, I'd be jumping on the Clippers to cover... so I'll just no-bet that game.
The more I look at it, the better the over is looking though.
Posted:
#4618
Thought to drop by and say Good Luck on your plays and thanks - mostly for facilitating a positive business like approach to sports handicapping - and a friendly support you showed yesterday. Needless to remind all the time that this business we're involved with is a 60%-40% business at its best and one who can't absorb 40% of the time the losses - better look for other venues. That is the killer for most - impatience and the desire to win it all at all the times.
Posted:
#4619
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:
The Thunder is not able to play for Under against the high paced team as the Clips. The Clips are playing some very good basketball and after a defeat in GS they'll be up to this game. People are still under impression of the Sixers covering against the Spurs. Well, the buck stops here.
The Thunder is not able to play for Under against the high paced team as the Clips. The Clips are playing some very good basketball and after a defeat in GS they'll be up to this game. People are still under impression of the Sixers covering against the Spurs. Well, the buck stops here.
Suckers were horrid last night only reason they covered is because the Spurs played to win not to 'cover' which is how Mavin and I saw it comin! Although SA is usually a strong play, you still must be careful as Pop likes to rest his players vs bad teams
Posted:
#4621
Quote Originally Posted by Fuzzrod:
awhh man I'm on the Thunder. This is a real statement team and I just see the Thunder putting LA in their place.
And the B2B scenario doesn't hurt things either. I just think the Thunder is a more talented team.
awhh man I'm on the Thunder. This is a real statement team and I just see the Thunder putting LA in their place.
And the B2B scenario doesn't hurt things either. I just think the Thunder is a more talented team.
I dont feel the same way fuzzrod
The only position that OKC has an advantage is KD. Every where else i give it too LAC or even, especially when comes to LAC first three off the bench with crawford, barnes and bledsoe vs martin collison and who, jackson maybe liggins.
now i know games are not won by the bench but i do believe that games are covered by the bench
intersested in any comments guys but I reallyt like clips here especially now my book is at +1 !!!
Posted:
#4622
Quote Originally Posted by stocktrader240:
Agree, I see value in Washington lately. So many just see the record and assume automatic loss. Wall has made a tremendous difference and ill be looking to bet on them until the bookies catch up. Similar to golden state to start the season I made a killing betting on them while so many still saw them as the warriors of old
Shhhhhh, the books are listening. lol
Posted:
#4624
Quote Originally Posted by CP74:
I dont feel the same way fuzzrod
The only position that OKC has an advantage is KD. Every where else i give it too LAC or even, especially when comes to LAC first three off the bench with crawford, barnes and bledsoe vs martin collison and who, jackson maybe liggins.
now i know games are not won by the bench but i do believe that games are covered by the bench
intersested in any comments guys but I reallyt like clips here especially now my book is at +1 !!!
Clips are 4-5 ATS with zero rest. Teams without rest are way too unpredictable. Fade them or don't bet them is the general rule.
Sure, you could win that bet. But, the whole idea of managing your money properly is always looking for the best spots to put it... that's not one of them.
Posted:
#4625
Quote Originally Posted by eaglequill:
The trouble is the public still thinks the Lakers are a good team with Kobe, Nash, Howard but they have no chemistry and are not playing with any heart. They are Fade material all year long!
NO DEFENSE, and no Defensive system, which is coaching
Did you here Stoudimires comments after a few games with wooden, im paraphrasing but he said this is the first time in his career hes learned a lick of D
Hot Forum Topics
