Posted:
#4626
2016 NBA SYSTEM AFTER TONIGHT
76-10 (88.4%) +44600
1H OVER for 1000 48-38 (55.8%) +6200
2H OVER for 2000 28-8-2 (77.8%) +38400
1st half, 2nd half OVER UNDER theory - all tourney long
Good luck fellows. No hate. Under 107.5 here hope we all win.
Posted:
#4630
Quote Originally Posted by SPARTICUS:
Where in the hell did this onslaught of craziness come from...MAN????
Where in the hell did this onslaught of craziness come from...MAN????
That's the problem with Covers. It's the forum with the best cappers but also the forum with the most idiots. And since the moderators here don't care, just gotta put up with it and ignore it best you can..
Anyhow, another profitable night by GianFranco
Posted:
#4632
Very impressive results yes!., but be careful as this play starts to make money leak outta Vegas their evil mathematicians will quickly fix the hole with huge second half totals... fixin' that hole where the rain gets in.
So its ice cream and grape knee highs all around till the cooking cows see what we're b' doing wit der shitty 2nd half numbers
till then its business as usual...wack em n' stack em
Posted:
#4636
Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
NEW TO THIS. IF YOU WIN 1ST HALF YOU DON'T BET 2ND HALF. IS THIS CORRECT?
NEW TO THIS. IF YOU WIN 1ST HALF YOU DON'T BET 2ND HALF. IS THIS CORRECT?
Are you new to reading?? Are you new to asking for handouts instead of working hard to get what you want?? I bet you are Canadian...
Just messing with you...
If you WIN the 1st half, you DO NOT bet the 2nd half!!!!!!
Posted:
#4637
Quote Originally Posted by Sticks83:
Are you new to reading?? Are you new to asking for handouts instead of working hard to get what you want?? I bet you are Canadian...
Just messing with you...
If you WIN the 1st half, you DO NOT bet the 2nd half!!!!!!
so yesterday would yield a profit of 1 unit?
Posted:
#4638
Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
so yesterday would yield a profit of 1 unit?
I doubt they even bother to teach math in the canadian education system, but I will let you attempt to answer your own question by doing the math:
Cavs 1st half = +1000
Celtics 1st half = +1000
Knicks 2nd half = +2000
Clippers 2nd half = +2000
Knicks 1st half = -1100
Warriors 1st half = -1100
Clippers 1st half = -1100
Warriors 2nd half = -2200
Posted:
#4639
Is there a way to set an IQ prerequisite that could be met before someone asks a question in this thread?
We can set one at 6 and I'm sure it would really cut down on the same obvious, boneheaded repititive questions we see day in day out.
If we raised the IQ limit set at 10... shoot, perhaps the people asking these qs might even have the foresight to check the last
few pages.
The stupid is so strong in this thread, I fear it somehow is attracting even more dummies to it.. like some sort of beacon call....
We can set one at 6 and I'm sure it would really cut down on the same obvious, boneheaded repititive questions we see day in day out.
If we raised the IQ limit set at 10... shoot, perhaps the people asking these qs might even have the foresight to check the last
few pages.
The stupid is so strong in this thread, I fear it somehow is attracting even more dummies to it.. like some sort of beacon call....
Posted:
#4640
Quote Originally Posted by dinomite70:
Quote Originally Posted by billyh:
He is Canadian Quote Originally Posted by Sticks83:
Are you new to reading?? Are you new to asking for handouts instead of working hard to get what you want?? I bet you are Canadian...Just messing with you...If you WIN the 1st half, you DO NOT bet the 2nd half!!!!!!
so yesterday would yield a profit of 1 unit?Are you new to reading?? Are you new to asking for handouts instead of working hard to get what you want?? I bet you are Canadian...Just messing with you...If you WIN the 1st half, you DO NOT bet the 2nd half!!!!!!
Wait till all the dumb Americans vote that idiot trump in! ????
Posted:
#4643
Quote Originally Posted by The_Truth_:
Is there a way to set an IQ prerequisite that could be met before someone asks a question in this thread?
We can set one at 6 and I'm sure it would really cut down on the same obvious, boneheaded repititive questions we see day in day out.
If we raised the IQ limit set at 10... shoot, perhaps the people asking these qs might even have the foresight to check the last
few pages.
The stupid is so strong in this thread, I fear it somehow is attracting even more dummies to it.. like some sort of beacon call....
Is there a way to set an IQ prerequisite that could be met before someone asks a question in this thread?
We can set one at 6 and I'm sure it would really cut down on the same obvious, boneheaded repititive questions we see day in day out.
If we raised the IQ limit set at 10... shoot, perhaps the people asking these qs might even have the foresight to check the last
few pages.
The stupid is so strong in this thread, I fear it somehow is attracting even more dummies to it.. like some sort of beacon call....
I believe that some were sent into this thread to kind of disrupt things....take a guess as to who sent them here to ask these silly questions...all they have to do is read some of the previous post & you will find most of the answers...if they are not too lazy!!
Posted:
#4647
Quote Originally Posted by ScottyB28:
I'm confused on this. How is the system 76-10 when your 1st half plays are 48-38?
I'm confused on this. How is the system 76-10 when your 1st half plays are 48-38?
Seriously, please stop cluttering the thread with useless, dumb questions. Before you begin to type these dumb questions, take the time to read and come up with the answer by yourself. Its extremely simple. If you read how the system works you would understand why the record is so. Please and thank you (yes I am Canadian).
Gian
Hot Forum Topics
