Tomorrow's action already submitted. Trevor Svajda 1st set ML +225
He lost today unfortunately...lost a few nice dinners on it
He lost today unfortunately...lost a few nice dinners on it
He lost today unfortunately...lost a few nice dinners on it
Incorrect. Zachary lost today. Trevor did not play.
Incorrect. Zachary lost today. Trevor did not play.
Very poor performance by Alek and a horrible investment by us.
* Ended up with very little profit today only reason we are even up is the large double investment on Kei but a ROUGH day at the office. Only going to play one play tomorrow which has been previously posted.
Very poor performance by Alek and a horrible investment by us.
* Ended up with very little profit today only reason we are even up is the large double investment on Kei but a ROUGH day at the office. Only going to play one play tomorrow which has been previously posted.
Kind of like the other day when the guy wanted to hijack your thread with a 3 page writeup supporting the opposite (losing) side, calling it something like "the most free money you can get" and then using whack tidbits to back up their claims such as delegitimizing prior accomplishments and opponent quality due to them being "30 years old".
WTF was that??? He goes point by point through a full 5 paragraph essay but every single point was completely fabricated BS. Comes off like a tout but gets the point home by using language and phrases to insinuate something is guaranteed, or a lock, or free money. And for whatever reason history has shown us that certain segments of people gravitate much more towards this type of overhyped rhetoric than they would to someone offering constructive analysis as the basis for their opinion.
My question is what motivates someone to do this? If you want to give your little sales pitch why not start a thread and lay it out there? Why instead would you wait for someone else to express a differing opinion so that you can swoop in and show them and the world that they are wrong and pretend that some other irrelevant crap actually backs up the claim. Why go to all that trouble at all?
What is going on around here lately? Is this normal behavior?
Kind of like the other day when the guy wanted to hijack your thread with a 3 page writeup supporting the opposite (losing) side, calling it something like "the most free money you can get" and then using whack tidbits to back up their claims such as delegitimizing prior accomplishments and opponent quality due to them being "30 years old".
WTF was that??? He goes point by point through a full 5 paragraph essay but every single point was completely fabricated BS. Comes off like a tout but gets the point home by using language and phrases to insinuate something is guaranteed, or a lock, or free money. And for whatever reason history has shown us that certain segments of people gravitate much more towards this type of overhyped rhetoric than they would to someone offering constructive analysis as the basis for their opinion.
My question is what motivates someone to do this? If you want to give your little sales pitch why not start a thread and lay it out there? Why instead would you wait for someone else to express a differing opinion so that you can swoop in and show them and the world that they are wrong and pretend that some other irrelevant crap actually backs up the claim. Why go to all that trouble at all?
What is going on around here lately? Is this normal behavior?
Or how about yesterday with wgomel on Kei but after he loses the first set somebody jumps in to save the day and let us know that something he picked up on with not converting the break points confirms that Kei can't win. But hey, he's just here to help though so what we can do now is just switch over to Shang in straight sets instead since you know with Kei being unable to win that makes Shang pretty much a sure thing.
Then when confronted he just reaffirms that he's here to help because he saw that thing with Kei and you know just trust him bro he was on Kei too but now he's just digging us all out of this hole cause he knows what he's doing with this stuff and is happy to help you guys.
What is this? What's the motivation here?
Or how about yesterday with wgomel on Kei but after he loses the first set somebody jumps in to save the day and let us know that something he picked up on with not converting the break points confirms that Kei can't win. But hey, he's just here to help though so what we can do now is just switch over to Shang in straight sets instead since you know with Kei being unable to win that makes Shang pretty much a sure thing.
Then when confronted he just reaffirms that he's here to help because he saw that thing with Kei and you know just trust him bro he was on Kei too but now he's just digging us all out of this hole cause he knows what he's doing with this stuff and is happy to help you guys.
What is this? What's the motivation here?
What about the Wimbledon final when I log onto my thread to find some kind of coordinated public service announcement going on basically saying like you know, as you see Noskova was unable to serve out the second set and since many of the readers here may be backing her we wanted to let you know that it's now mathematically impossible for her to recover and win the third set. Even though basic logic may suggest otherwise just remember we really know what we're talking about so trust us bro. Oh but hey the good news is you can just go cash out whatever you can from Noskova and roll it onto Muchova. I mean it's a sure thing why wouldn't you do that, in fact let's all do it right now!
I mean, obviously I'm being overly dramatic with my paraphrasing here . But does this kind of stuff not seem a little odd or is it just me?
I know those of you that have been around who were on Linda rode it out because you know better but the casuals in the shadows are more likely to be affected. What if you had a significant investment in one of these matches and in the heat of the moment you let some bozo convince you to leave a winning position for a losing one? How sick would that feel? This crap helps nobody, no matter how you try and frame it.
Does anyone know if there is anywhere on the internet where adults who gamble on sports with real money can get together and discuss mutual interests?
What about the Wimbledon final when I log onto my thread to find some kind of coordinated public service announcement going on basically saying like you know, as you see Noskova was unable to serve out the second set and since many of the readers here may be backing her we wanted to let you know that it's now mathematically impossible for her to recover and win the third set. Even though basic logic may suggest otherwise just remember we really know what we're talking about so trust us bro. Oh but hey the good news is you can just go cash out whatever you can from Noskova and roll it onto Muchova. I mean it's a sure thing why wouldn't you do that, in fact let's all do it right now!
I mean, obviously I'm being overly dramatic with my paraphrasing here . But does this kind of stuff not seem a little odd or is it just me?
I know those of you that have been around who were on Linda rode it out because you know better but the casuals in the shadows are more likely to be affected. What if you had a significant investment in one of these matches and in the heat of the moment you let some bozo convince you to leave a winning position for a losing one? How sick would that feel? This crap helps nobody, no matter how you try and frame it.
Does anyone know if there is anywhere on the internet where adults who gamble on sports with real money can get together and discuss mutual interests?
Alot of talk about the Boulter/ Alex wedding. Wonder why Tommy Paul's wedding flew under the radar?
Back to tennis, Alex is the defending champion and number 1 seed. Alex opened -225 favorite and is currently -135.
Stefanos has a clear advantage in this matchup and has found confidence with a title under his belt.
Looking forward to watching this match.
Alot of talk about the Boulter/ Alex wedding. Wonder why Tommy Paul's wedding flew under the radar?
Back to tennis, Alex is the defending champion and number 1 seed. Alex opened -225 favorite and is currently -135.
Stefanos has a clear advantage in this matchup and has found confidence with a title under his belt.
Looking forward to watching this match.
Mornin U
Only one wager today, will be watching/ scouting.
Mornin U
Only one wager today, will be watching/ scouting.
@wgomel21
Stefanos 12-1 vs him wow that's crazy and Just off a title . I put him with kudermetova but might just take the 50% profit cash out already and watch your first set bet. Knowing nothing about tennis like you all but think we will know early what kind of game this will be. Think I'm on the right side bc why isn't line higher playing defending champ and guy ranked what 300 spots higher?
Anyway good luck to us!
@wgomel21
Stefanos 12-1 vs him wow that's crazy and Just off a title . I put him with kudermetova but might just take the 50% profit cash out already and watch your first set bet. Knowing nothing about tennis like you all but think we will know early what kind of game this will be. Think I'm on the right side bc why isn't line higher playing defending champ and guy ranked what 300 spots higher?
Anyway good luck to us!
Eala sure does have a flair for the dramatic doesn't she? Next time instead of betting her before the match maybe I'll wait till she's a set and a break down lol.
The heralded 16 year old was very impressive fighting back against Alex. Was hard to predict how she'd do at this level but certainly passed that test. 25-4 record on the year and has won 14 of last 15, all at W100 level before today.
Her road to the semifinals includes Joint and then likely McNally so she's definitely in play to make a run here.
Eala sure does have a flair for the dramatic doesn't she? Next time instead of betting her before the match maybe I'll wait till she's a set and a break down lol.
The heralded 16 year old was very impressive fighting back against Alex. Was hard to predict how she'd do at this level but certainly passed that test. 25-4 record on the year and has won 14 of last 15, all at W100 level before today.
Her road to the semifinals includes Joint and then likely McNally so she's definitely in play to make a run here.
Great experience to have your boots on the ground. Sitting in the blazing sun and suffering the sweltering heat would be the drawback.
Great experience to have your boots on the ground. Sitting in the blazing sun and suffering the sweltering heat would be the drawback.
Welcome back
Welcome back
Something to think about. Honeymooners are 0-2 with Alex remaining.
Boulter lost yesterday
Tommy Paul lost earlier today
Something to think about. Honeymooners are 0-2 with Alex remaining.
Boulter lost yesterday
Tommy Paul lost earlier today
Nothing wrong with being excited about grabbing the W. Lord B is doin same thing. Ride that wave and carry that momentum on your next move. ![]()
Nothing wrong with being excited about grabbing the W. Lord B is doin same thing. Ride that wave and carry that momentum on your next move. ![]()
Walter…I need a W. What is your prediction here with Stefanos? Alex is so unpredictable…
please
Walter…I need a W. What is your prediction here with Stefanos? Alex is so unpredictable…
please
Trevor blew a luv-40 game hurt and naturally is broken the next game. To answer your question, I believe Stefanos is the play, but we have lost a lot of value so limit the size of your wager.
Trevor blew a luv-40 game hurt and naturally is broken the next game. To answer your question, I believe Stefanos is the play, but we have lost a lot of value so limit the size of your wager.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.