So wait, Sentinel you don't even bet the games you put on here...you only bet parlays in "real life"?
I obviously have to play a single bet before I can play a parlay bet in rolling style. So this is the first stage. The ultimate stage is on my other thread that NO ONE seems to be paying attention to. And that's where I make the REAL profit.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melosjumper7:
So wait, Sentinel you don't even bet the games you put on here...you only bet parlays in "real life"?
I obviously have to play a single bet before I can play a parlay bet in rolling style. So this is the first stage. The ultimate stage is on my other thread that NO ONE seems to be paying attention to. And that's where I make the REAL profit.
So you claim to be in the top 1 percentile in winning bets on parlays no less, which the house has more of a clear advantage to win...any bettor knows that, or learns that quickly. I'm not saying you don't win or that you aren't in the top percentile, or even that you aren't winning at the straight bets on here. I'm just saying, is that what your claim is on your parlays? Also, the evidence of this, outside of you stating it?
0
So you claim to be in the top 1 percentile in winning bets on parlays no less, which the house has more of a clear advantage to win...any bettor knows that, or learns that quickly. I'm not saying you don't win or that you aren't in the top percentile, or even that you aren't winning at the straight bets on here. I'm just saying, is that what your claim is on your parlays? Also, the evidence of this, outside of you stating it?
I checked it out, and it looks like a decent strategy. Like I said, I wasn't claiming your not good, just wanted some evidence. That strategy has been used many times before, but since you have enough units to roll until profit, I get it. Then when you finally hit the roll, you gain profit and go back down on units to "re-roll" basically. Possibly every once in a while, if you find a good spot you might up units on a certain play outside of the exact roll strategy, or no? Good luck to you, either way.
0
I checked it out, and it looks like a decent strategy. Like I said, I wasn't claiming your not good, just wanted some evidence. That strategy has been used many times before, but since you have enough units to roll until profit, I get it. Then when you finally hit the roll, you gain profit and go back down on units to "re-roll" basically. Possibly every once in a while, if you find a good spot you might up units on a certain play outside of the exact roll strategy, or no? Good luck to you, either way.
The real advantage in this, is having enough money to constantly re-roll with the juice added as well. A billionaire would love this strategy basically.
0
The real advantage in this, is having enough money to constantly re-roll with the juice added as well. A billionaire would love this strategy basically.
The real advantage in this, is having enough money to constantly re-roll with the juice added as well. A billionaire would love this strategy basically.
The thing is you dont need a fortune. A 1000 units will suffice and never be busted.
There will be occasional set backs. But overall you are going to be heading north. There are so many back to back winners with the Zone. Thats what first got me thinking this method would exloit rolling parlays very well. And if you hit a sweet run like I do from time to time. You can reel off several parlays in a row.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melosjumper7:
The real advantage in this, is having enough money to constantly re-roll with the juice added as well. A billionaire would love this strategy basically.
The thing is you dont need a fortune. A 1000 units will suffice and never be busted.
There will be occasional set backs. But overall you are going to be heading north. There are so many back to back winners with the Zone. Thats what first got me thinking this method would exloit rolling parlays very well. And if you hit a sweet run like I do from time to time. You can reel off several parlays in a row.
You are too kind. I am not that good. I just understand how this game works. Which is why as you may have noticed I avoid the big events as much as possible. Too many suspect collapes going on.
In the lowet level events it does what it says on the tin more often. And theres more value on alot of the favourites. Because greedy all or nothing bettors cant bet huge amounts on them. They have TO WAIT, to grind out those profits like a business. Which is the way it should be done anyway.
when you get to the main tournaments favourites are over bet lower than their true value. So you then get player like Murray coming in at less than 1.2. When in reality he should be no lower than 1.6 or thereabouts. And when he gets beat like he did against Ferrer people wonder why?
0
Quote Originally Posted by lls_321:
World class handicapping
You are too kind. I am not that good. I just understand how this game works. Which is why as you may have noticed I avoid the big events as much as possible. Too many suspect collapes going on.
In the lowet level events it does what it says on the tin more often. And theres more value on alot of the favourites. Because greedy all or nothing bettors cant bet huge amounts on them. They have TO WAIT, to grind out those profits like a business. Which is the way it should be done anyway.
when you get to the main tournaments favourites are over bet lower than their true value. So you then get player like Murray coming in at less than 1.2. When in reality he should be no lower than 1.6 or thereabouts. And when he gets beat like he did against Ferrer people wonder why?
You are too kind. I am not that good. I just understand how this game works. Which is why as you may have noticed I avoid the big events as much as possible. Too many suspect collapes going on.
In the lower level events it does what it says on the tin more often. And theres more value on alot of the favourites. Because greedy all or nothing bettors cant bet huge amounts on them. They have TO WAIT, to grind out those profits like a business. Which is the way it should be done anyway.
when you get to the main tournaments favourites are over bet lower than their true value. So you then get player like Murray coming in at less than 1.2. When in reality he should be no lower than 1.6 or thereabouts. And when he gets beat like he did against Ferrer people wonder why?
0
Quote Originally Posted by lls_321:
World class handicapping
You are too kind. I am not that good. I just understand how this game works. Which is why as you may have noticed I avoid the big events as much as possible. Too many suspect collapes going on.
In the lower level events it does what it says on the tin more often. And theres more value on alot of the favourites. Because greedy all or nothing bettors cant bet huge amounts on them. They have TO WAIT, to grind out those profits like a business. Which is the way it should be done anyway.
when you get to the main tournaments favourites are over bet lower than their true value. So you then get player like Murray coming in at less than 1.2. When in reality he should be no lower than 1.6 or thereabouts. And when he gets beat like he did against Ferrer people wonder why?
Got a decent streak going its been a while. I now have 6 straight wins. Which translates into three consecutive parlay wins on the parlay thread. Will try to keep it going.
0
Got a decent streak going its been a while. I now have 6 straight wins. Which translates into three consecutive parlay wins on the parlay thread. Will try to keep it going.