Taking stands against both these guys at absurd prices. -900 and -700. Get the hell out of here. These guys need to put alot of work in in their young careers to be laying these kinds of numbers in major matches.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Taking stands against both these guys at absurd prices. -900 and -700. Get the hell out of here. These guys need to put alot of work in in their young careers to be laying these kinds of numbers in major matches.
Hackanov is fun to fade as a favorite. The guy is a spray machine with his forehand the likes of Paire. Constantly donating cheap points on absurd wild swings.
0
Hackanov is fun to fade as a favorite. The guy is a spray machine with his forehand the likes of Paire. Constantly donating cheap points on absurd wild swings.
This is not the first time you've come at me with BS only to be proven wrong. Medvedev lost the first 2 sets in 1 hour. I posted at 9:45. That match began at 9:36. Your first post here was at 10:30 when he just lost the 2nd set.
0
This is not the first time you've come at me with BS only to be proven wrong. Medvedev lost the first 2 sets in 1 hour. I posted at 9:45. That match began at 9:36. Your first post here was at 10:30 when he just lost the 2nd set.
This is not the first time you've come at me with BS only to be proven wrong. Medvedev lost the first 2 sets in 1 hour. I posted at 9:45. That match began at 9:36. Your first post here was at 10:30 when he just lost the 2nd set.
I wish I had the chance to tail. You posted at 945 and both were already being played and both were down in each match when i checked at 946. No worries. I like to tail your female underdogs +250 or more but lately it has been a downer. Is that why it is not posted? You only post on other venues and not Wimbledon?
Good Luck!
0
Quote Originally Posted by rzagza:
This is not the first time you've come at me with BS only to be proven wrong. Medvedev lost the first 2 sets in 1 hour. I posted at 9:45. That match began at 9:36. Your first post here was at 10:30 when he just lost the 2nd set.
I wish I had the chance to tail. You posted at 945 and both were already being played and both were down in each match when i checked at 946. No worries. I like to tail your female underdogs +250 or more but lately it has been a downer. Is that why it is not posted? You only post on other venues and not Wimbledon?
And yes I'm still doing the +250s in almost all the womens matches with the exception of Kvitova and Karolina Pliskova because they're so tough on grass. Stay the course otherwise.
0
And yes I'm still doing the +250s in almost all the womens matches with the exception of Kvitova and Karolina Pliskova because they're so tough on grass. Stay the course otherwise.
Monteiro must want to vomit. Blew the 2nd set in excuciating fashion then blows 2 set points in the 3rd set, loses another tiebreaker. He's basically screwed now.
0
Monteiro must want to vomit. Blew the 2nd set in excuciating fashion then blows 2 set points in the 3rd set, loses another tiebreaker. He's basically screwed now.
Its unreal that not every court has hawkeye challenge...Khach was up 0-40 on Monteiro at 2-2 in this set and everyone missed an obvious out call by Thiago...that easily could have turned this set in Karen favor.
With the richest tourny in the world, how can they possibly not allow for challenges on every court? Ridiculous
I agree it's ridiculous. Just like some of the majors not having any lights. Cheap pricks. How much can lights possibly cost?
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Its unreal that not every court has hawkeye challenge...Khach was up 0-40 on Monteiro at 2-2 in this set and everyone missed an obvious out call by Thiago...that easily could have turned this set in Karen favor.
With the richest tourny in the world, how can they possibly not allow for challenges on every court? Ridiculous
I agree it's ridiculous. Just like some of the majors not having any lights. Cheap pricks. How much can lights possibly cost?
Shapovolov reminds me a ton of Dolgopolov. Not sure he'll ever be elite. He will be one of those up and down yo-yo players with great wins and awful losses.
Khachanov and Alex Zverev are def the future. Zverev will be #1 for sure at some point. Khachanov is a top 10 player if he can be more patient off the ground. He's overly aggressive. Needs to pick his spots.
0
Shapovolov reminds me a ton of Dolgopolov. Not sure he'll ever be elite. He will be one of those up and down yo-yo players with great wins and awful losses.
Khachanov and Alex Zverev are def the future. Zverev will be #1 for sure at some point. Khachanov is a top 10 player if he can be more patient off the ground. He's overly aggressive. Needs to pick his spots.
nothing stands out to you because you didn't watch them growing up on the challenger circuit nor care about diving into coaching. You are just a dart boarder with no real edge.
0
nothing stands out to you because you didn't watch them growing up on the challenger circuit nor care about diving into coaching. You are just a dart boarder with no real edge.
nothing stands out to you because you didn't watch them growing up on the challenger circuit nor care about diving into coaching. You are just a dart boarder with no real edge.
They dont have the weapons you need to be a top 10 player. And I doubt theyre willing to embrace the grind like a David Ferrer. Kachanov and Zverev have serious firepower but Zverev's mental approach is better than KK so far. He also moves better.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PeteySkeety:
nothing stands out to you because you didn't watch them growing up on the challenger circuit nor care about diving into coaching. You are just a dart boarder with no real edge.
They dont have the weapons you need to be a top 10 player. And I doubt theyre willing to embrace the grind like a David Ferrer. Kachanov and Zverev have serious firepower but Zverev's mental approach is better than KK so far. He also moves better.
Grass is the one finicky surface for the women. The reason for that is it plays to the players who are the shot makers. You see less tampon upsets under that scenario where the true ballstrikers outhit their opponents as opposed to just getting outgrinded by some scrub playing ping pong and praying for errors. Case in point Brenge beat Kvitova on a hardcourt but plays her today on the faster surface and probably gets blown off the court, and thats even these Wimbledon courts playing slower than ever, it's still the fastest surface out there with the low bounce.
0
Grass is the one finicky surface for the women. The reason for that is it plays to the players who are the shot makers. You see less tampon upsets under that scenario where the true ballstrikers outhit their opponents as opposed to just getting outgrinded by some scrub playing ping pong and praying for errors. Case in point Brenge beat Kvitova on a hardcourt but plays her today on the faster surface and probably gets blown off the court, and thats even these Wimbledon courts playing slower than ever, it's still the fastest surface out there with the low bounce.
Hot Forum Topics
