Posted:
#1
Betting on this shyt raises your blood pressure up like no other.
How many times am I going to see some broad I bet on go up 5-1, just to end up losing 5-7?
Jesus.......
3
Be honest. Is there anything more frustrating than betting on women's tennis
Posted:
#3
I have no clue what you guys are talking about - you describe the perfect conditions for trading and then you whine? The best thing when choosing a sport to bet on is that “unsuspected” things happen - then just learn to read it better than the market and then you are golden 
- always suspect the unsuspected basically (esp. Live markets are wild and even though it seems unpredictable you pretty quickly notice patterns - if you follow tennis a lot)
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
2
Posted:
#5
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:
yup i've also seen a million times when they win the first set 6-1 then lose the 2nd set 6-2. hot garbage
yup i've also seen a million times when they win the first set 6-1 then lose the 2nd set 6-2. hot garbage
Oh my God. Don't even get me started on that. Like how is that even possible? I'll tune into a match and see them end destroying their opponent 6-1 in the first set, then place a live bet and all of a sudden the broad can't serve or return to save her life. I mean what the hell happened in those few minutes when you sat down between sets?
3
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
I have no clue what you guys are talking about - you describe the perfect conditions for trading and then you whine? The best thing when choosing a sport to bet on is that “unsuspected” things happen - then just learn to read it better than the market and then you are golden - always suspect the unsuspected basically (esp. Live markets are wild and even though it seems unpredictable you pretty quickly notice patterns - if you follow tennis a lot)
I have no clue what you guys are talking about - you describe the perfect conditions for trading and then you whine? The best thing when choosing a sport to bet on is that “unsuspected” things happen - then just learn to read it better than the market and then you are golden - always suspect the unsuspected basically (esp. Live markets are wild and even though it seems unpredictable you pretty quickly notice patterns - if you follow tennis a lot)
Exactly. Yes, it sucks when it's your player who blows the lead but if you can't stomach that then you definitely need to stay away from the women because it absolutely is going to happen time and time again. The first thing to know about women's tennis is that it's women's tennis. It is almost a completely different sport than the men who are bigger, stronger, and can back up their serve infinitely better for those exact reasons. There are quality women's players who consistently struggle to back up their serve but they win matches by being good on return. You won't find good men's players that can't back up their serve. The variance in the women's game is what creates opportunities.
3
Posted:
#10
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:
tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve
tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve
That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed.
0
Posted:
#11
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22:
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed.
9 out of 10 times they shank the return or right into the net
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed.
0
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24:
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed. 9 out of 10 times they shank the return or right into the net
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed. 9 out of 10 times they shank the return or right into the net
Nerves, but at the highest level, you would think that they would have all of that sorted out. You would expect that kind of stuff from lower level tennis, but not at the highest level.
0
Posted:
#14
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22:
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed. 9 out of 10 times they shank the return or right into the net Nerves, but at the highest level, you would think that they would have all of that sorted out. You would expect that kind of stuff from lower level tennis, but not at the highest level.
Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by theMatrix24: tennis is just another stupid fucking sport for losers. fritz with 9 break points 0 breaks. do this fucking idiots go full r3t8rd every time it's advantage and the server is on his 2nd serve That's actually a good question and something else I've noticed. 9 out of 10 times they shank the return or right into the net Nerves, but at the highest level, you would think that they would have all of that sorted out. You would expect that kind of stuff from lower level tennis, but not at the highest level.
Brother...these guys are human beings. They aren't programmed to win, hence this is where gambling was put into play. If it was a perfect science, we'd all be cashin'!
Secondly...there is a reason Women play best 2/3 all the time, regardless of Grand Slams or regular tournaments...
And...I particularly like this from Calde13
The best thing when choosing a sport to bet on is that “unsuspected” things happen - then just learn to read it better than the market and then you are golden - always suspect the unsuspected basically
2
Posted:
#15
But now, all of a sudden, you two partners in crime are talking about the ATP. As pointed out, those are so different that it would be a stretch to treat them as the same sport, at least from a gambling perspective!
Tennis is an "unfair" game by design. It isn't THAT unusual for the player who wins the most points to end up the loser. Name another sport where that would be the case. Points are only important if they win you games, and games are only important if they win you sets, and sets are only important if they win you the match. As you can see, it becomes complex to explain to an outsider. In ATP, they have a strong serve, so they're more likely to win key points. Most players on both tours have a hidden level that they access when facing key points! John Isner, in his prime, often had odds of -190 for that serve game - when serving down 0-40 because he almost always won his serves. Then, you just had to see him make six aces in a row rather than four before collecting your money! But again, you clearly noticed that this is tennis and how it works ! Why don't you embrace that fact and learn to trade it? The sport and its athletes weren't waiting for you to notice before changing their ways and they don’t do it to bugger you - this is how it has worked for centuries- probably also before you were born 
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
3
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi:
If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way
If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way
Unless of course we're talking about prime serena, but I doubt we'll see another one of those anytime soon.
2
Posted:
#21
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22:
Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi: If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way Unless of course we're talking about prime serena, but I doubt we'll see another one of those anytime soon.
Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi: If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way Unless of course we're talking about prime serena, but I doubt we'll see another one of those anytime soon.
Did you actually bet WTA back in Serena’s prime or is it just something you pulled out of your ass? Because I have a hot take here - I am almost 100% certain you would be down money if you had bet same amount on Serena to win on all her matches from she started until she retired - you could almost never no matter her opponent get better odds than -1000 and most often she was somewhere in the -3000, -5000 range - and she did actually lose once in a while even though when you look back at the grand scope of thing maybe didn’t seem like it
You do know that it is the odds in relation to your win procentage that define if you are winning long term right? Your win procentage alone doesn’t define anything
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#22
Just a heads up it's not just women.
I looked today and some of these tournaments are R1 and R16 right now. You have odds of +200 on dogs and they are winning the damn matchups. The -200 or -300 favorites are barely winning. These are nail biters right up until the end. Who needs the stress? I wait until the dominant players are in tournaments and then I bet on Tennis. 95% of these players are unreliable as hell. They can't be trusted with my $. That's the men and women not just women. Tennis is a joke for betting on imo until the big tournaments come around.
1
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by Coin86:
Just a heads up it's not just women. I looked today and some of these tournaments are R1 and R16 right now. You have odds of +200 on dogs and they are winning the damn matchups. The -200 or -300 favorites are barely winning. These are nail biters right up until the end. Who needs the stress? I wait until the dominant players are in tournaments and then I bet on Tennis. 95% of these players are unreliable as hell. They can't be trusted with my $. That's the men and women not just women. Tennis is a joke for betting on imo until the big tournaments come around.
Just a heads up it's not just women. I looked today and some of these tournaments are R1 and R16 right now. You have odds of +200 on dogs and they are winning the damn matchups. The -200 or -300 favorites are barely winning. These are nail biters right up until the end. Who needs the stress? I wait until the dominant players are in tournaments and then I bet on Tennis. 95% of these players are unreliable as hell. They can't be trusted with my $. That's the men and women not just women. Tennis is a joke for betting on imo until the big tournaments come around.
You make a good point.
0
Posted:
#24
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi: If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way Unless of course we're talking about prime serena, but I doubt we'll see another one of those anytime soon. Did you actually bet WTA back in Serena’s prime or is it just something you pulled out of your ass? Because I have a hot take here - I am almost 100% certain you would be down money if you had bet same amount on Serena to win on all her matches from she started until she retired - you could almost never no matter her opponent get better odds than -1000 and most often she was somewhere in the -3000, -5000 range - and she did actually lose once in a while even though when you look back at the grand scope of thing maybe didn’t seem like it You do know that it is the odds in relation to your win procentage that define if you are winning long term right? Your win procentage alone doesn’t define anything
Quote Originally Posted by Nuts22: Quote Originally Posted by icemantbi: If you bet favorites in Women's tennis, especially heavy chalk favorites like Iga is against Amanda your gonna get killed I learned that the hard way Unless of course we're talking about prime serena, but I doubt we'll see another one of those anytime soon. Did you actually bet WTA back in Serena’s prime or is it just something you pulled out of your ass? Because I have a hot take here - I am almost 100% certain you would be down money if you had bet same amount on Serena to win on all her matches from she started until she retired - you could almost never no matter her opponent get better odds than -1000 and most often she was somewhere in the -3000, -5000 range - and she did actually lose once in a while even though when you look back at the grand scope of thing maybe didn’t seem like it You do know that it is the odds in relation to your win procentage that define if you are winning long term right? Your win procentage alone doesn’t define anything
Obviously I meant the spread.......
0
Hot Forum Topics
