Therizz's NHL Opening Game Fav 2013-14

I rolled my early HAT losses onto that 2H MIZZ play and cleared all of them with that W...DET really hurt though.  I did not play the STL series, thankfully.  Good luck to all as usual...

I'm down 11 units. I'm betting way below my bankroll, so not too worried about riding this out on the labby line.

Thankfully my totals system had  a great night 7-2-2.

Look for the NHL Totals system thread started by me on this page.

 

here is a link too: https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=79&sub=101715520

Thanks Dan, jumping on board after losing 17 units today. I am still up over 50 units on the season, but want to break that 100 unit mark by end of next month hopefully. 

Wednesday: Minnesota on the regular system A game.

Thursday is STL on the double dip B.

Upcoming possibilities: Thursday  Van, Saturday  Phx and Toronto.

Regular system:

Record 21-2

A: 18-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 9-0

A: 6-4

B: 2-1 (STL pending)

C: 1-0

Hey Dan, have you ever considered just playing the A games for this system? I'm no expert but it looks like it would have been profitable this year. How about previous years though?

River, last year's total are below. You might be on to something with the A games. A combined 57-23 (71%). This year we are almost at 73% on the A game. Looks like the 2011/2012 season was at 67% on A games (double dip not tracked).

Last year Final totals

Regular chase record:

48-4

A 37-15

B 9-6

C 2-4

Double dip record

Record 26-2

A 20-8

B 4-4

C 2-2

Dan how many units are you going on tonight's game with consideration to last nights round of games ?

I'm going light, only 1 unit.

Wednesday results: Minnesota wins on the regular system A game. No double dip opportunity.

Thursday is STL on the double dip B. Doesn't look like Van will qualify vs SJ.

Upcoming possibilities: Saturday Phx and Toronto.

Regular system:

Record 22-2

A: 19-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 9-0

A: 6-4

B: 2-1 (STL pending)

C: 1-0

A games will have higher winning percentage obviously because they have a filter of -130 or higher and use to be -145 or higher. Based on those odds they need a higher winning percentage to make up for the juice. 

we need this friggin b bet win

Thursday: STL on B game on the double dip. Van does not qualify on the regular chase.

Upcoming possibilities: Saturday Phx and Toronto.

Regular system:

Record 22-2

A: 19-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 9-0

A: 6-4

B: 2-1 (STL pending)

C: 1-0

Thursday results: STL wins on the B game on the double dip and are done.

Upcoming possibilities: Saturday Phx and Toronto.

Regular system:

Record 22-2

A: 19-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 10-0

A: 6-4

B: 3-1

C: 1-0

winner winner chicken dinner

Hey guys,

Hey guys,

Double Dip = 2nd half of a 6 game home stand, chasing 2nd win.

Could be any length of series of at least 4. After the regular chase win, as long as there ar at least 3 games left, you start the process over with a team needing to qualify the next game. If they do it's a double dip A game. If they don't qualify, the chase is done regardless of how many games are left.

Saturday: Phoenix and Toronto both on the regular chase A game. 

 

Regular system:

Record 22-2

A: 19-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 10-0

A: 6-4

B: 3-1

C: 1-0

pho line is dropping quite a bit from last night. It might not stay above -130 before game time. Either way I am on it though. 

Saturday results: Phoenix and Toronto both win on the regular chase A game. Phoenix is done. Toronto has a chance for the double dip Tuesday.

For Sunday, it doesn't look like Wash will qualify against STL.

Monday - Wpg looks good against Calgary. Lots of potential action Tuesday.  

Regular system:

Record 24-2

A: 21-5

B: 2-3

C: 1-2

Double dip:

Record 10-0

A: 6-4

B: 3-1

C: 1-0

has anyone considered starting a series when the opening game didnt qualify but the 2nd game of a 4 or more game series qualified? i know at least 1 other person has thought about this. if you did some research, i'd like to hear what you found. i'll also take a look myself