All Forums | Systems & Strategies

Ridiculously absurd chase system

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 55046
Posts: 438
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 20434
Posted: #101
Quote Originally Posted by BaggerVANCE:


yes but since you're doubling your wager on the (b) game, thus chasing the original loss, a successful (b) game voids the original loss on (a). it is all graded as a win since there is no net loss of units.

Yes that i understand,but my question is why was the B game played? The A game won the night before that so there shouldn't have been a chase on the B game?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #102
Oct 5th PHI lost 4-1 (A) game , so you bet the dog the next game which just happened to PHI again and it won +1.5 on that game (B)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #103
[Quote: Originally Posted by DJsmurf45]

What if you played this system +1 and not +1.5(better money)

 

To me a push is not a loss,  How would it affect the chase?

[/Quote)

Here is the answer to your question

A) 40
B) 9
C) 1
D) 1

It's a much less costly approach netting you 51 units! Good call! 
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 20434
Posted: #104
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Oct 5th PHI lost 4-1 (A) game , so you bet the dog the next game which just happened to PHI again and it won +1.5 on that game (B)

Gotcha..thanks
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #105
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Quote Originally Posted by DJsmurf45:

What if you played this system +1 and not +1.5(better money)

 

To me a push is not a loss,  How would it affect the chase?

[/Quote)

Here is the answer to your question

A) 40
B) 9
C) 1
D) 1

It's a much less costly approach netting you 51 units! Good call! 


Now THIS is something I can get excited about without too much worry with my small bankroll.  Thanks for running those numbers so quickly!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #106
Winnipeg wins on the (A) game

Record
A)  75
B) 18
C) 3
D) 1

Also now tracking +1 pushes not tracked, just dog outright winners!

Record 
A) 41
B) 9
C) 1
D) 1

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 20434
Posted: #107
It keeps on rolling....good work
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #108
Can the madness continue? 

Buffalo +1.5 (A)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2005
Posts: 1399
Posted: #109
Hey Jeff been following for a few weeks and thanks for the info/profits.  As this is still the 1st game of the chase, however, may skip this matchup
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 27577
Posted: #110
whats up jeff    very interesting system you have going on here.however don't fully understand your wagering concept.years back I was in a chase system that used all dogs, it was very simple if game a was+120 you put $100 on it. if it lost game b might be +125 you would wager $200 on it to collect your losses and profit from  game two payout. you cant do that in this situation. if -1.5 was -150 and you lost putting a $100 on it, you couldn't put $200 on game b at -165, because by the time you get to game c it would be impossible to recoup your losses with a $300 play. or for game b do you add your losses to $200 more? any way best of luck!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #111
Quote Originally Posted by potvin:

whats up jeff    very interesting system you have going on here.however don't fully understand your wagering concept.years back I was in a chase system that used all dogs, it was very simple if game a was+120 you put $100 on it. if it lost game b might be +125 you would wager $200 on it to collect your losses and profit from  game two payout. you cant do that in this situation. if -1.5 was -150 and you lost putting a $100 on it, you couldn't put $200 on game b at -165, because by the time you get to game c it would be impossible to recoup your losses with a $300 play. or for game b do you add your losses to $200 more? any way best of luck!


Hey there, for fav lines, you have to bet to WIN the $100.  Example: -150 line, bet $150 to win $100.  That's why fav chases require a LARGE roll, due to compounding on the subsequent games after a loss.  Continuing from above, if the -150 first chase bet loses, & the next one was -150 as well, you'd have to wager whatever the amount is to WIN back your original $150 plus another $100 ($250), which would be $375.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 27577
Posted: #112

Quote Originally Posted by Hardtimes75:



Hey there, for fav lines, you have to bet to WIN the $100.  Example: -150 line, bet $150 to win $100.  That's why fav chases require a LARGE roll, due to compounding on the subsequent games after a loss.  Continuing from above, if the -150 first chase bet loses, & the next one was -150 as well, you'd have to wager whatever the amount is to WIN back your original $150 plus another $100 ($250), which would be $375.

that's what I thought did an n.f.l. system like that

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 108
Posted: #113
Forget this + 1.5 business jeff run the numbers for straight up dog wins?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 108
Posted: #114
thank you, I think I am going to start with +1 to lower the juice and see how that goes.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #115
Thursday 2/6 

Calgary (B) 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 846
Posted: #116
we'll get em tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 108
Posted: #117
now jeff sorry one more question, when you were back checking for the +1, how would you play it. Say you lost your first play (A), then play (B) was a push, would your next play be to keep chasing my first loss or do I start over? because of the push. thanks
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 27577
Posted: #118
I would think keep playing, otherwise you will lose the chase
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 27577
Posted: #119

Quote Originally Posted by t_vigilante:



Didn't even look at the schedule today, then noticed there were only 3 games on tonight.
I said it before, the system has problems with days that have 3 games or less on it.

Calgary +1.5 makes me wanna puke just looking at it, but if it hits....then wow, this system has some bawls.

I don't think flames +1.5 is a bad play at all.my isles suck as favs. they might win outright

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 1195
Posted: #120
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Winnipeg wins on the (A) game

Record
A)  75
B) 18
C) 3
D) 1

Also now tracking +1 pushes not tracked, just dog outright winners!

Record 
A) 41
B) 9
C) 1
D) 1

shoot i can hardly find any sites that offer +1 PL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13947
Posted: #121
Make your own +1 brobeans
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2011
Posts: 861
Posted: #122

Flames are -125 +1PL now at 5 Dimes Jeff .

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 1272
Posted: #123

I thought Columbus was a selection for the last game

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 1195
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by wheaty :

Make your own +1 brobeans
I don't think I can do that on Bovada
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 508
Posted: #125
Quote Originally Posted by Brobeans:

I don't think I can do that on Bovada


You can do it on any book.  You just have to do a PL hedged with a ML bet to come up with the equivalent.  Look up the calculations on the net.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.