Posted:
#401
tomorrow play
E.
0
Ridiculously absurd chase system
JEFF what's the play ?
Posted:
#422
Wait so this clown picks games based on what time they start at 
Let me give a little math lesson to everyone.
At -150 your break-even point is 60%.
To need to win at least 1/4 @ 60%, you are effectively laying/risking:
(1 - 0.60)^4, or 39.06 to 1. Your break-even point is 97.44%. This tout is boasting about a 95.5% system where you are risking 39 to 1.
Let me put this is simpler terms. You lose 4 in a row @ -150, you lose 39 units. You don't lose 4 in a row @ -150 (JEFF's system), you win 1 unit.
Heck even I have a fool proof system that's hitting at 99.995%. It's very simple: You'll win 1 unit 99.995% of the time. But when you lose, you lose your house.
Maybe the OP should go back to sucking c0ck for a living 
1
Posted:
#425
Quote Originally Posted by m0rtgageguy:
Wait so this clown picks games based on what time they start at
Wait so this clown picks games based on what time they start at
Let me give a little math lesson to everyone.
At -150 your break-even point is 60%.
To need to win at least 1/4 @ 60%, you are effectively laying/risking:
(1 - 0.60)^4, or 39.06 to 1. Your break-even point is 97.44%. This tout is boasting about a 95.5% system where you are risking 39 to 1.
Let me put this is simpler terms. You lose 4 in a row @ -150, you lose 39 units. You don't lose 4 in a row @ -150 (JEFF's system), you win 1 unit.
Heck even I have a fool proof system that's hitting at 99.995%. It's very simple: You'll win 1 unit 99.995% of the time. But when you lose, you lose your house.
Maybe the OP should go back to sucking c0ck for a living
Hey m0rtgageguy, although i am certain that Jeff is more than capable of defending himself and his system here, perhaps you might be better served to shut your piehole and go back and read the post in it's entirity.
Although i do not personally condone using a chase type "system" when it comes to wagering i do respect the time that Jeff has taken to research his past data and his record with his system in this forum post has a very transparent and proven track record that speaks for itself.
Mortgageguy, you may feel that you are offering some points of wisdom for all to consider but it's the very manner in which you present your arguments which leaves much to be desired. Not to mention, i find it kind of creepy the way you seem to indulge in "stalking" other members on this board with your "bullying" type posts. This isn't the first time you have come across this way.
In closing, move along and don't buy into Jeff's system if that's the way you feel. If you have something constructive to mention than by all means feel free to contribute it in a sensible manner but to consistently badger others in a betting forum only proves to us all your lack of intelligence.
SteamR Out!!
0
Hot Forum Topics
