Holy moly, what do you do for the Nats game today since they are a whopping -305? Do you take the -1.5 RL for -145? That -305 is a lot of juice to lay down.
Holy moly, what do you do for the Nats game today since they are a whopping -305? Do you take the -1.5 RL for -145? That -305 is a lot of juice to lay down.
Holy moly, what do you do for the Nats game today since they are a whopping -305? Do you take the -1.5 RL for -145? That -305 is a lot of juice to lay down.
I took the RL, not laying that juice.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
Quote Originally Posted by rayfinkle005:
Holy moly, what do you do for the Nats game today since they are a whopping -305? Do you take the -1.5 RL for -145? That -305 is a lot of juice to lay down.
Nationals clear on Game 1. Diamondbacks up Tuesday against sizzling Dodgers.
2017 Record: 10-0
Game 1 wins - 7
Game 2 wins - 2
Game 3 wins - 1
Record since tracking started in 1999: 573-1
506 wins within first two games
LAD, CUBS, HOU is a ROUGH 10-game stretch. at least ARI will be the dog in the first 2 or 3, so shouldn't be too expensive going into the cubs series should they be swept by the dodgers.
Quote Originally Posted by CKP22:
Nationals clear on Game 1. Diamondbacks up Tuesday against sizzling Dodgers.
2017 Record: 10-0
Game 1 wins - 7
Game 2 wins - 2
Game 3 wins - 1
Record since tracking started in 1999: 573-1
506 wins within first two games
LAD, CUBS, HOU is a ROUGH 10-game stretch. at least ARI will be the dog in the first 2 or 3, so shouldn't be too expensive going into the cubs series should they be swept by the dodgers.
I see that the Texas Rangers are the only loss this system had - are there any modifications that people are using to account for the dreaded losing streak that kills your bankroll?? For example, I saw someone mention they use a labby line and never chase past a game 3 loss. Would love to hear any ideas
I see that the Texas Rangers are the only loss this system had - are there any modifications that people are using to account for the dreaded losing streak that kills your bankroll?? For example, I saw someone mention they use a labby line and never chase past a game 3 loss. Would love to hear any ideas
when the LAD lost 2 in a row to the braves, there was big juice involved on game 3, so i used a sort of modified labby, i generally chase the ML to cover, so i laid off a little in that game and bet more the next 2 to claw back.
bankroll management is crucial in a chase system. I don't mind giving a little back to my books every now and then, especially in a successful system like this. just keeps them from squeezing me or putting a cap on my single game limit if they realize i'm chasing.
when the LAD lost 2 in a row to the braves, there was big juice involved on game 3, so i used a sort of modified labby, i generally chase the ML to cover, so i laid off a little in that game and bet more the next 2 to claw back.
bankroll management is crucial in a chase system. I don't mind giving a little back to my books every now and then, especially in a successful system like this. just keeps them from squeezing me or putting a cap on my single game limit if they realize i'm chasing.
ML always for me - this system is built on winning, not by how much these top teams win by. Accordingly, its important to manage the Game A wagers properly. I assume 3 losses minimum, especially with homestands like the D-backs are having now. When juice is high, still manage money properly. The system speaks for itself.
ML always for me - this system is built on winning, not by how much these top teams win by. Accordingly, its important to manage the Game A wagers properly. I assume 3 losses minimum, especially with homestands like the D-backs are having now. When juice is high, still manage money properly. The system speaks for itself.
ML always for me - this system is built on winning, not by how much these top teams win by. Accordingly, its important to manage the Game A wagers properly. I assume 3 losses minimum, especially with homestands like the D-backs are having now. When juice is high, still manage money properly. The system speaks for itself.
Exactly.
Quote Originally Posted by Irish7878:
ML always for me - this system is built on winning, not by how much these top teams win by. Accordingly, its important to manage the Game A wagers properly. I assume 3 losses minimum, especially with homestands like the D-backs are having now. When juice is high, still manage money properly. The system speaks for itself.
So according to your post at the beginning of the year you aren't entering a 3 game chase. So are done with AZ now? or betting them again in some fashion? ...they only have 5 games remaining at home.
CKP22: Nothing else for today correct?
Thx
Hi Dan,
So according to your post at the beginning of the year you aren't entering a 3 game chase. So are done with AZ now? or betting them again in some fashion? ...they only have 5 games remaining at home.
For Friday on the double dip, AZ game 3. Washington won on Thursday and have 5 games left. A game Friday.
Note on the system, I forgot that I use 5 games as the double dip criteria, so will use that starting here. Cost us a couple plays earlier, but we will just move forward using 5.
As for the question in the post above, we chase AZ until they win 1 or until lose 5 in a row on this home stand. We don't stop in the middle of a chase based on games remaining.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
For Friday on the double dip, AZ game 3. Washington won on Thursday and have 5 games left. A game Friday.
Note on the system, I forgot that I use 5 games as the double dip criteria, so will use that starting here. Cost us a couple plays earlier, but we will just move forward using 5.
As for the question in the post above, we chase AZ until they win 1 or until lose 5 in a row on this home stand. We don't stop in the middle of a chase based on games remaining.
I was more referring to you saying earlier you would be resetting your chase on games 3 and 4, therefore taking a loss on AZ after their two losses. Quote #936 of this thread.
Or are you not doing that any longer?
Thanks Dan.
I was more referring to you saying earlier you would be resetting your chase on games 3 and 4, therefore taking a loss on AZ after their two losses. Quote #936 of this thread.
I was more referring to you saying earlier you would be resetting your chase on games 3 and 4, therefore taking a loss on AZ after their two losses. Quote #936 of this thread.
Or are you not doing that any longer?
Understand. I adjust according to lines on games lost and next game. Since AZ was a dog both losses, I'm rolling on to a game 3.
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
Quote Originally Posted by Nuscas:
Thanks Dan.
I was more referring to you saying earlier you would be resetting your chase on games 3 and 4, therefore taking a loss on AZ after their two losses. Quote #936 of this thread.
Or are you not doing that any longer?
Understand. I adjust according to lines on games lost and next game. Since AZ was a dog both losses, I'm rolling on to a game 3.
So according to your post at the beginning of the year you aren't entering a 3 game chase. So are done with AZ now? or betting them again in some fashion? ...they only have 5 games remaining at home.
CKP22: Nothing else for today correct?
Thx
Next post All-Star system play is next week.
Quote Originally Posted by Nuscas:
Hi Dan,
So according to your post at the beginning of the year you aren't entering a 3 game chase. So are done with AZ now? or betting them again in some fashion? ...they only have 5 games remaining at home.