Posted:
#26
another empty netter with 30 seconds left
sharks/hawks ODD $24.46 to ewin $11.12
0
NHL Final score ODD - $100- $10k chase
Posted:
#32
Quote Originally Posted by dj_destroyer:
Stay the course with your system of course but I'd just love to see this system taking the + money plays -- it would help out the chasing!
Stay the course with your system of course but I'd just love to see this system taking the + money plays -- it would help out the chasing!
-good point, thing is, what is better - chasing something that wins 70% of the time to 3, or chasing something that win 30% of the time to 6 ? -which is basically what you would be doing if you chased evens at +170...... correct answer is probably neither
..but an interesting discussion for sure...looks like just one game for tonite
level 1-ducks/wild ODD -220 $7.70 to win $3.18
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by dlew2k:
perhaps you might want to consider a Labby for all the games.. i.e. start a labby for games that start 7p-7:59 , and labbies for 8-9 then labbies for 9-10 , 10p+ . Even if the Odd hits at 67%, one can chase effectively with a labby at -200 odds.
perhaps you might want to consider a Labby for all the games.. i.e. start a labby for games that start 7p-7:59 , and labbies for 8-9 then labbies for 9-10 , 10p+ . Even if the Odd hits at 67%, one can chase effectively with a labby at -200 odds.
I think thats a really good idea...thanks !
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by neilsy25:
I think thats a really good idea...thanks !
-sorry, hit submit to soon ... I would like to work on this idea, any thoughts on how you see the labby looking to best offset the -220 juice ?..anyway...need at least a goal in the 3rd..Go Sens..tie it up and get me the ODD at the same time..
0
Posted:
#44
Quote Originally Posted by neilsy25:
-sorry, hit submit to soon ... I would like to work on this idea, any thoughts on how you see the labby looking to best offset the -220 juice ?..anyway...need at least a goal in the 3rd..Go Sens..tie it up and get me the ODD at the same time..
let me crunch out some numbers on a spreadsheet, and back test it from ... Nov 1 ?
But firstly I would say an aggressive labby like 5 5 5 5 would certainly make the -220 go away quick!
0
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by dlew2k:
let me crunch out some numbers on a spreadsheet, and back test it from ... Nov 1 ?
But firstly I would say an aggressive labby like 5 5 5 5 would certainly make the -220 go away quick!
Should be interesting, can't wait to see what you come up with. Curious to see how big the numbers get and if they'll be manageable.
0
Hot Forum Topics
