Jonny - I saw your post the other day about taking the dogs +1.5. I didn't see any new sheet in your spreadsheet where you calculated this. Although 75% sounds like a great winning pct, it is not that high considering the price on goal lines. For example, the Kings +1.5 tonight would be -240. You would have to win that bet 70.6% to break-even, not to mention increasing your wager amount by 2.5 times. I think your regular dog plays are the way to go. Go Kings!
0
Jonny - I saw your post the other day about taking the dogs +1.5. I didn't see any new sheet in your spreadsheet where you calculated this. Although 75% sounds like a great winning pct, it is not that high considering the price on goal lines. For example, the Kings +1.5 tonight would be -240. You would have to win that bet 70.6% to break-even, not to mention increasing your wager amount by 2.5 times. I think your regular dog plays are the way to go. Go Kings!
Jonny - I saw your post the other day about taking the dogs +1.5. I didn't see any new sheet in your spreadsheet where you calculated this. Although 75% sounds like a great winning pct, it is not that high considering the price on goal lines. For example, the Kings +1.5 tonight would be -240. You would have to win that bet 70.6% to break-even, not to mention increasing your wager amount by 2.5 times. I think your regular dog plays are the way to go. Go Kings!
Yeah, I started a sheet for it and just didn't have time to pursue it fully. Maybe something there later...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Syracuse44:
Jonny - I saw your post the other day about taking the dogs +1.5. I didn't see any new sheet in your spreadsheet where you calculated this. Although 75% sounds like a great winning pct, it is not that high considering the price on goal lines. For example, the Kings +1.5 tonight would be -240. You would have to win that bet 70.6% to break-even, not to mention increasing your wager amount by 2.5 times. I think your regular dog plays are the way to go. Go Kings!
Yeah, I started a sheet for it and just didn't have time to pursue it fully. Maybe something there later...
Jonny: I ran the numbers for the puck lines on all your plays to date. They were 63-23 73.26% for a profit of 208.40. Your profit of 232.01 is better despite a lesser record of 43-43. Personally, I will just stick with the moneylines since there is less risk. I added a formula to your spreadsheet that will calculate profit and loss based on the result of a "WIN" or "LOSS" entry. That might make it easier for you and cut-out any math errors. But, I am not sure how to post the Excel spreadsheet to this forum. Let me know if you are interested.
0
Jonny: I ran the numbers for the puck lines on all your plays to date. They were 63-23 73.26% for a profit of 208.40. Your profit of 232.01 is better despite a lesser record of 43-43. Personally, I will just stick with the moneylines since there is less risk. I added a formula to your spreadsheet that will calculate profit and loss based on the result of a "WIN" or "LOSS" entry. That might make it easier for you and cut-out any math errors. But, I am not sure how to post the Excel spreadsheet to this forum. Let me know if you are interested.
Jonny: I ran the numbers for the puck lines on all your plays to date. They were 63-23 73.26% for a profit of 208.40. Your profit of 232.01 is better despite a lesser record of 43-43. Personally, I will just stick with the moneylines since there is less risk. I added a formula to your spreadsheet that will calculate profit and loss based on the result of a "WIN" or "LOSS" entry. That might make it easier for you and cut-out any math errors. But, I am not sure how to post the Excel spreadsheet to this forum. Let me know if you are interested.
Thanks but I just copy and paste. No data entry needed other than the odds.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Syracuse44:
Jonny: I ran the numbers for the puck lines on all your plays to date. They were 63-23 73.26% for a profit of 208.40. Your profit of 232.01 is better despite a lesser record of 43-43. Personally, I will just stick with the moneylines since there is less risk. I added a formula to your spreadsheet that will calculate profit and loss based on the result of a "WIN" or "LOSS" entry. That might make it easier for you and cut-out any math errors. But, I am not sure how to post the Excel spreadsheet to this forum. Let me know if you are interested.
Thanks but I just copy and paste. No data entry needed other than the odds.
good points raised about the ml or puckline play when betting dogs. i for one would be more inclined to play the puckline because of the common occurrence of 1 goal losses by the dogs in the nhl.
0
good points raised about the ml or puckline play when betting dogs. i for one would be more inclined to play the puckline because of the common occurrence of 1 goal losses by the dogs in the nhl.