Well fellas, the month of October is behind us and we've made a killer profit so far!
On October 5th, we started with $1000 bucks. Those who are following the daily adjusted 2% units are up $329.43 while those playing the flat $20 units are up $301.40, or 15.07 units! We are also well above our ROI goal of 10% with a sweet 22% return. And when checking out our chart, we can see that this growth has been consistent throughout the month.
Keep in mind that dogs are typically generous at the beginning of the season, so I'll attribute some of our success to that. Thanks for following and here's to keeping the train rolling through November.
0
Well fellas, the month of October is behind us and we've made a killer profit so far!
On October 5th, we started with $1000 bucks. Those who are following the daily adjusted 2% units are up $329.43 while those playing the flat $20 units are up $301.40, or 15.07 units! We are also well above our ROI goal of 10% with a sweet 22% return. And when checking out our chart, we can see that this growth has been consistent throughout the month.
Keep in mind that dogs are typically generous at the beginning of the season, so I'll attribute some of our success to that. Thanks for following and here's to keeping the train rolling through November.
Jonny - This system has inspired me to actually post a reply. I have been following the last few weeks and I am very impressed. Sound logic with the anti-consensus and playing dogs. Not very flashy, but very steady and consistent growth without taking too many hits. I was looking into your plays to see if I could understand the theory better. Your picks today confuse me a bit. Although they are both dogs, they are not going against consensus opinion as they are 53% and 57%. Not knocking you at all, just wondering what your thought process is. I think this has great possibilities for baseball as well. Thanks.
0
Jonny - This system has inspired me to actually post a reply. I have been following the last few weeks and I am very impressed. Sound logic with the anti-consensus and playing dogs. Not very flashy, but very steady and consistent growth without taking too many hits. I was looking into your plays to see if I could understand the theory better. Your picks today confuse me a bit. Although they are both dogs, they are not going against consensus opinion as they are 53% and 57%. Not knocking you at all, just wondering what your thought process is. I think this has great possibilities for baseball as well. Thanks.
Jonny - This system has inspired me to actually post a reply. I have been following the last few weeks and I am very impressed. Sound logic with the anti-consensus and playing dogs. Not very flashy, but very steady and consistent growth without taking too many hits. I was looking into your plays to see if I could understand the theory better. Your picks today confuse me a bit. Although they are both dogs, they are not going against consensus opinion as they are 53% and 57%. Not knocking you at all, just wondering what your thought process is. I think this has great possibilities for baseball as well. Thanks.
You're totally right, dude. Tonight's plays were both dogs and consensus picks. There's really no theory here other than start with the dogs that go heavy against the consensus and pick those with the best value. However, one should not ignore the other dogs with great value. PHI and TOR were both golden plays in my opinion and had to be played to get us back on track. Cool for us, they both popped. Thanks for following, bro!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Syracuse44:
Jonny - This system has inspired me to actually post a reply. I have been following the last few weeks and I am very impressed. Sound logic with the anti-consensus and playing dogs. Not very flashy, but very steady and consistent growth without taking too many hits. I was looking into your plays to see if I could understand the theory better. Your picks today confuse me a bit. Although they are both dogs, they are not going against consensus opinion as they are 53% and 57%. Not knocking you at all, just wondering what your thought process is. I think this has great possibilities for baseball as well. Thanks.
You're totally right, dude. Tonight's plays were both dogs and consensus picks. There's really no theory here other than start with the dogs that go heavy against the consensus and pick those with the best value. However, one should not ignore the other dogs with great value. PHI and TOR were both golden plays in my opinion and had to be played to get us back on track. Cool for us, they both popped. Thanks for following, bro!
After losing those shootout games last night I went through the scores from all of the plays so far and noticed if you gave them each 1.5 points, they would have gone 57-18 for a 75% clip. I don't know what the puckline odds were on those games but if they all averaged out to anything above -400, one would be ahead. I've started charting these games on a new sheet in the book.
0
Hey guys -
After losing those shootout games last night I went through the scores from all of the plays so far and noticed if you gave them each 1.5 points, they would have gone 57-18 for a 75% clip. I don't know what the puckline odds were on those games but if they all averaged out to anything above -400, one would be ahead. I've started charting these games on a new sheet in the book.
meltdown Tuesday night in WAS. 
Hot Forum Topics
