Monday 5/27 results
Dog EFF Score
1-1, +.15 units
YTD 17-20, +.74 units
Pitt 180 Loss
Minn 115 WIN
Dog EFF
0-1, - 2 units
YTD 43-38, +29.72 units
All 2 units
Tex game 1 105 Loss
System Plays
3-4, -.95 units
YTD 132-155, +7.95 units
Tex game 1 105 Loss
SD 105 Loss
Tor 105 WIN
Minn 115 WIN
Mets 105 WIN
STL/KC Under 7 +110 Loss
Cubs/Sox Under 7.5 -120 Loss
We are looking for teams who won their previous game and are facing a team within their division.
We are looking for teams who won their previous game and are facing a team within their division.
I label them 1-5 from the sheet, with 1 being the low scoring dog and 5 being the Under bet. Here is what I had for Sunday. Multiple numbers mean they qualified for multiple systems.
| Minn |
| NYY |
| Tex |
| Phil |
| Pitts |
| Tor |
| Cle |
| SD |
| STL/LAD |
Tuesday 5/28 system plays
Dog EFF Score
YTD 17-20, +.74 units
Atl 105
NYY 110
Minn 110
LAA 120
Dog EFF
YTD 43-38, +29.72 units
All 2 units
Atl 105
Pitt 145
System Plays
YTD 132-155, +7.95 units
Atl 105
Pitt 145
Hou 155
Cubs 170
Minn 110
LAA 120
NYY/Mets Under 6.5 -115
Yeah teamrankings.com uses AJAX to render the page after it's loaded - so you can't use a typical excel web query - I found another way to grab the data from teamrankings.com - look thorugh my spreadsheets and more thread - there should be a teamrankings spreadhseet that I developed that has some sample code. I probably could figure out how to do it the traditional way - but haven't spent much time on it.
Yeah teamrankings.com uses AJAX to render the page after it's loaded - so you can't use a typical excel web query - I found another way to grab the data from teamrankings.com - look thorugh my spreadsheets and more thread - there should be a teamrankings spreadhseet that I developed that has some sample code. I probably could figure out how to do it the traditional way - but haven't spent much time on it.
+1 
Are you running a current spreadsheet? Degen has made several changes and his latest is version 11. You can download that from the link in post 1.
The columns for Dog EFF and Dog EFF Score start with column T. These won't show as plays, there needs to be a little human thought. For Dog EFF SCORE we are looking at the last two columns that show either a positive or neg number as dog and as fave. If I see any dog with a positive score and a fave with a negative score, it's a play for the Dog EFF Score system. Takes me just a minute to go through each game.
For Dog EFF system, look at all the teams that qualify for any of the 4 systems (obviously not the Under system). If a qualifying team has an Overall Dog Eff and a Using Odss Dog Eff number of .400 or better in each column, I make it a play.
Hope this helps.
Hey great catch, thanks. Sorry guys I messed that up. I had it correct on my sheet but posted wrong.
I'll correct the YTD record and units after the games tonight.
Tuesday 5/28 results
Dog EFF Score
2-2, +.15 units
YTD 19-22, +.89 units
Atl 105 WIN
NYY 110 Loss
Minn 110 Win
LAA 120 Loss
Dog EFF
2-0, +5 units
YTD 45-38, +34.72 units
All 2 units
Atl 105 WIN
Pitt 145 WIN
System Plays
4-2, +2.6 units
YTD 137-156, +12.75 units
Atl 105 WIN
Pitt 145 WIN
Hou 155 Loss
Cubs 170 rain
Minn 110 WIN
LAA 120 Loss
NYY/Mets Under 6.5 -115 WIN
Degen, I've been tracking something starting on May 15. I've been looking at dogs that have a pitcher rated with a better Sagarin rating than the fave. I'm not considering C tier or even B tier pitchers for the most part, I did make a game with Liriano a play.
Pretty interesting results so far. Total record is 18-20, but breaking this down to a filter of 10 ranking points you get this - Dog with +11 or more is 15-9 while 10 or less is 3-11.
So, in this small sample size a dog with a starting pitcher ranked at least 10 higher than the fave has been a good play. I'll keep tabs on how this progresses, just thought I'd throw that out there.
^^correction^^
So, in this small sample size a dog with a starting pitcher ranked at least 10 higher than the fave has been a good play. I'll keep tabs on how this progresses, just thought I'd throw that out there.
Should have read at least 11 higher.
^^correction^^
So, in this small sample size a dog with a starting pitcher ranked at least 10 higher than the fave has been a good play. I'll keep tabs on how this progresses, just thought I'd throw that out there.
Should have read at least 11 higher.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
