Posted:
#1801
GL Kemosabe0
MLB system releases...
Posted:
#1802
Quote Originally Posted by BLACKEN1772:
TOR pitching change Cecil for Romero. I have Cecil slated for tonight I don't know when the change was made and could have been before the games were posted therefore most would not realize a switch. I thought I would pass it on. There has been a $.30 neg line move since 10pm est last night.
TOR pitching change Cecil for Romero. I have Cecil slated for tonight I don't know when the change was made and could have been before the games were posted therefore most would not realize a switch. I thought I would pass it on. There has been a $.30 neg line move since 10pm est last night.
I'm confused, do you mean Romero is pitching instead of Cecil today. He's listed at every book I use.
In fact, I've seen Romero on the overnight odds so there has been no change there for a while.
0
Posted:
#1804
Quote Originally Posted by snyder9:
I'm confused, do you mean Romero is pitching instead of Cecil today. He's listed at every book I use.
In fact, I've seen Romero on the overnight odds so there has been no change there for a while.
I'm confused, do you mean Romero is pitching instead of Cecil today. He's listed at every book I use.
In fact, I've seen Romero on the overnight odds so there has been no change there for a while.
Cecil was originally slated to start, but was changed to Romero due to Toronto having the luxury of 2 days off this week. The Jays announced this change early last night, but I never saw the change at most books until around 2am et.
0
Posted:
#1808
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
0
Posted:
#1809
Quote Originally Posted by MeMyselfandEye:
jasonr...Unit attachment isn't that difficult for each individual handicapper. - if you would read the thread, it's all in there. Its takes time, and the correct application to understand. I like the fact SN does not post his units. If you have an understanding of the ideas presented here you would already know the unit attachment...and for those that are 'bottomfeeders", it really upsets them.
I bet there have been 50 posts through tthe entire thread asking "Why doesn't SN attach units?" For those that have the understanding, the knowledge, the patience to learn, it's all there.
Historical Results:
Fri 7/24 +14.40
Sat 7/25 +13.84
Sun 7/26 -11.60
Mon 7/27 +12.20
Tues7/28 +18.42
Wed7/29 +2.38
Thurs7/30 +36.38
Fri 7/31 +20.52
Sat 8/1 +8.84
Sun 8/2 +15.45
Mon 8/3 + 3.85
Tues -22.16
That is +112.52 Units in the last 12 days...
jasonr...Unit attachment isn't that difficult for each individual handicapper. - if you would read the thread, it's all in there. Its takes time, and the correct application to understand. I like the fact SN does not post his units. If you have an understanding of the ideas presented here you would already know the unit attachment...and for those that are 'bottomfeeders", it really upsets them.
I bet there have been 50 posts through tthe entire thread asking "Why doesn't SN attach units?" For those that have the understanding, the knowledge, the patience to learn, it's all there.
Historical Results:
Fri 7/24 +14.40
Sat 7/25 +13.84
Sun 7/26 -11.60
Mon 7/27 +12.20
Tues7/28 +18.42
Wed7/29 +2.38
Thurs7/30 +36.38
Fri 7/31 +20.52
Sat 8/1 +8.84
Sun 8/2 +15.45
Mon 8/3 + 3.85
Tues -22.16
That is +112.52 Units in the last 12 days...
I can't buy into these numbers since the units risked aren't indicated before the games. They could be bogus since they are posted after the game
0
Posted:
#1810
How about you track back the units won/lost from the inception of this thread and make it simple for yourself by simply attaching 8 units to the RL, 4 to the ML/1st five inns, and 2 to the U/O.
If you don't count a unit return well into the +200s, then I'll pay some attention to your ramblings.
If you don't count a unit return well into the +200s, then I'll pay some attention to your ramblings.
0
Posted:
#1811
Quote Originally Posted by jasonr:
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
Not that you are worth a response, being the little creep you are.. but this is multiple times now where you are attacking this thread, and the host.
Now, as well, you are attacking his character, honesty, and integrity.
The only thing I can possibly say to you (and the nicest as well..) is please graduate high school so you have the skills necessary to read a book from cover to cover. If you would take 1 hour of your obviously "too busy to care" life and read this thread from beginning to finish, all of your questions will be answered. To your surprise, you may actually learn something as well.. even tho you have now proven on multiple occasions to not be capable of learning anything.
Assigned Unit value has been discussed in length throughout this thread. If one reads carefully and takes the time to comprehend what they are reading, you will know exactly how many Units he plays for on each wager.
In conclusion, everyone who contributes to this thread in a positive matter and understands what is going on here, can tell you almost exactly how many Units sports_Network is up or down well before he posts the results.
Nice try, but take your immature skills elsewhere.. you have overstayed your welcome here now.
0
Posted:
#1813
[Quote: Originally Posted by sports_Network]
MLB system releases Friday 08/07/09 Base_Runs formula...
Diamondbacks-106 ML...loss
Cubs+135 ML...scratched
Braves+124 ML...win
RedSox+122 ML...loss
Rangers+135 ML...win
Giants-135 RL...loss
BlueJays+130 RL...loss
WhiteSox+120 RL...loss
Mariners+182 RL...loss
ninePACformulated
projected ratio: 6/9 66.6%
R/R status ratio: 14/22 63.6%
SN
FINAL RESULTS:
2-6
units:-14.12
R/R status ratio: 14/36 39%
0
Posted:
#1815
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture:
Not that you are worth a response, being the little creep you are.. but this is multiple times now where you are attacking this thread, and the host.
Now, as well, you are attacking his character, honesty, and integrity.
The only thing I can possibly say to you (and the nicest as well..) is please graduate high school so you have the skills necessary to read a book from cover to cover. If you would take 1 hour of your obviously "too busy to care" life and read this thread from beginning to finish, all of your questions will be answered. To your surprise, you may actually learn something as well.. even tho you have now proven on multiple occasions to not be capable of learning anything.
Assigned Unit value has been discussed in length throughout this thread. If one reads carefully and takes the time to comprehend what they are reading, you will know exactly how many Units he plays for on each wager.
In conclusion, everyone who contributes to this thread in a positive matter and understands what is going on here, can tell you almost exactly how many Units sports_Network is up or down well before he posts the results.
Nice try, but take your immature skills elsewhere.. you have overstayed your welcome here now.
Okay Children, and to be honest with majority of you I am old enough to be your dad...So take a seat and learn from someone who knows...First of all this thread is more less a School of learning, what you perceive to learn from it, depends on you and what you perceive is being discussed. Your actions, they are only yours. If you are unable to conceive a theory of handicapping, then that is your problem. It is common knowledge that no one here is garanteeing any picks or winners of any particular game. What is being discussed is different ways to eliminate obsticles that would other wise prevent from reading or GUESSING the outcome of a game. So to be very polite about this I have only this to say to only the ones pertains to and that is ' GROW UP...BE QUITE...and QUITE WHINNING about your Stupidity in not keeping pace in what is being said. THANK YOU, and Have a wonderful day!!!
Not that you are worth a response, being the little creep you are.. but this is multiple times now where you are attacking this thread, and the host.
Now, as well, you are attacking his character, honesty, and integrity.
The only thing I can possibly say to you (and the nicest as well..) is please graduate high school so you have the skills necessary to read a book from cover to cover. If you would take 1 hour of your obviously "too busy to care" life and read this thread from beginning to finish, all of your questions will be answered. To your surprise, you may actually learn something as well.. even tho you have now proven on multiple occasions to not be capable of learning anything.
Assigned Unit value has been discussed in length throughout this thread. If one reads carefully and takes the time to comprehend what they are reading, you will know exactly how many Units he plays for on each wager.
In conclusion, everyone who contributes to this thread in a positive matter and understands what is going on here, can tell you almost exactly how many Units sports_Network is up or down well before he posts the results.
Nice try, but take your immature skills elsewhere.. you have overstayed your welcome here now.
0
Posted:
#1818
Quote Originally Posted by jasonr:
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
OKay Son, first off WHO THE @@@@@@@DO YOU THINK YOU ARE even trying to get into someone else business, whatever anyone says they win or lose is irrelevent in regards to this thread....Comeon Grow up and take the diapers off, if you want to learn then continue reading, study and quit taking the easy way in life
A bad day but up 53 units because Rangers were the strongest play and fading Saunders was the way to go.
If he posts the units won or lost after the games then he can list the units risked before the games starts.
The reason he's not listing the units risked before the game is because then we would easily notice that he's not being honest.
0
Posted:
#1820
Quote Originally Posted by snyder9:
SN
I was wondering if you're making any plays for NFL preseason? or do you only start during regular season.
If as you say that you perform much better in football than in baseball - I can't wait to see it.
SN
I was wondering if you're making any plays for NFL preseason? or do you only start during regular season.
If as you say that you perform much better in football than in baseball - I can't wait to see it.
pre-season is just that; pre-season. Strictly recreational, time to study roster changes, players positioning for a starting role, quarterbacks getting their timing down, starters playing the first quarter, time to analize, not wager. How does one handicapp a scrimmage? flip a coin? the coaches, the players, could care- less who wins, or loses; only the home fans worship a win..as the set spread indicates: +3visitors -3home games that mean virtually 'nothing' except "coach performance" are played as such.. why squander away your BR on a scrimmage game? wait and get ready for the real thing, where a win actually has meaning, and a matchup can be handicapped realisticly...to each his own, if a game is on TV, and I am analizing performance with a cold one in hand, and seek added recreation/entertainment, sure, I'll put a twenty dollar bill on the dog, just don't take pre-season wagering serious, and go beyond a c note wager...talk to me on "week one" the best to you always
SN
0
Posted:
#1821
Kreat, 7, Snyder -
The problem is we are giving
what he wants. Everyone had their shot at including myself. If we continue to respond to , this thread will degrade to the point of all the others. I propose if a $h1t stirrer gets smacked by someone after that we do not waste any more time and space on him . We can not fill these pages with useless banter and crap. And thats all I have to say about that!
BLKN
0
Posted:
#1823
SN - If you are declaring a respite for yourself, i offer my full support. or at least as much as i can in an electronic environment.
i agree w/blacken. no breaths to be wasted on the haters -- children that they are. they seem to have forgotten that this mutual interest of all ours' is still called 'gambling'
plenty of baseball left this season. regroup my friend and live for yourself and no-one else 4 a few days.
feel free to PM me if u need to vent.
0
Posted:
#1825
BLKN, correct call, no replay required when evaluating the impaired. when serious commentary becomes ignorant, it then possesses humor ,in the abstract, which in return, entertains the intellectual concept of a "wart" ( a un-wanted virus that appears out of nowhere, for no particular reason other than to be nurtured, and fed attention until they are disolved, by a no response attitude) an extremely frustrated bottomfeeder looking for the edge in which he will 'never' find, based on approach alone...
0
Hot Forum Topics
