MLB RPI SYSTEM 2012

I thought to qualify as a play the team must be over 500 not at .500.  B2W can you confirm.

Thanks

Looks like we have 2 games on tap as "A" games and 2 "B" games tomorrow. And no bookie, cws wont be a play. They have a worse record than thier opponent. Good night.

Yes you are correct, thanks for noticing that. So the White Sox would NOT qualify as a play tomorrow.

What are the "A" plays for Tuesday?

I made a Twitter account @MLBRPI. If you guys want, I can do my best to post the plays to that each day. And/or I can give you the password to the account and we can all be responsible for posting the plays on there. B2W what do you think? And everyone else...what do you think? I know that Covers doesn't work so well on certain phones/tablets etc so in terms or checking picks, Twitter might be a good option. Lemme know!

Well for me, I use decimal odds. My wagering system would be a little bit different. But to give you a general idea, whatever my "A" game bet is, if it loses, I double it up or more on the "B" game just as long as I get back whatever I lost in the "A" game and then profit for at least 50% of what I wagered in "A" game.

Thought so.

Only 2 "A"  games tomorrow? According to my calculations, I have ATL, SF, and WAS as the "A" games and NYM and LAD as "B" games. Am I missing something?

We'll find out what the games are in a couple of hours. Goodnight guys!

Im worry about a lot of C games which take our wins. Pre-RPI have a lot of C games and if we look a year before and 2 year before its JUST 8 games ending at C game.

If im not afraid of NYM, LAD making me scare af fuck

But HEY it maybe just me...

BOL

Something funny going on with the spreadsheet? When I update the standings the stats are going to the wrong teams and the NY Mets row reads DIFF

L10

POFF

I am aware of the spreadsheet issue.  This appears to be due to the data coming from ESPN.

regularjoe is correct, there is some bad data that is throwing everything off (down) apparently starting at the Mets row.

I will look into it this morning but if it is on ESPN's end, then there is nothing I can do.  It will most likely 'fix itself' the next time ESPN updates the standings.

 

I have found the problem and will post a new version of the workbook shortly.

ESPN inserted a new line on the web page the data comes from and that threw everything off.

B2W.... I like STL against the butt pirates... STL has been playing solid ball and plus there at home.. GL all Lets gooo SF

StL looks good. I agree.

Is it just me or the thread is somewhat messed up? The page seems to not load correctly but others do.

But the number don't fit the system. Are you playing em b2w?

B2W, what's wrong with ATL ?

Doesn't SF need a .500 record in order to be a play?