thanks, but I definitely don't want to have 10 open "series" but am going dodgers under... thought that was my best option
"Athletics @Tigers, Pirates @Padres and Orioles @Indians would all be Under-Series.
MIN @SEA, PIT @SD already hit.
OAK @DET and BAL @CLE would be B-bets."
you have any opinion or ever think about waiting for after A bet? so like if you are only doing B and C after losing A i feel like if it then did get swept, i saved money... also adds bets if a lot has cleared already
Never tested that, so no idea. Might be good, might be bad. Honestly: My guess would be as good as anyones.
Regarding the pushs: Buying half a run in the "right" direction could increase hit rate significantly. But makes losses also more cost intense. Once again: No testing on this.
Will have a look on that, but it will take a while.
Astros @Red Sox: Cole - Porcello: 1.44 to win 1.00
Diamondbacks v Giants: Kelly - Samardzija: 1.41 to win 1.00
Dodgers @Reds: Hill - Desclafani: 1.42 to win 1.00
Mets @Marlins: deGrom - Richards: 2.28 to win 1.00
Rays @Yankees: Stanek - Sabathia: 1.04 to win 1.00
A: 43
B: 20 (2 running)
C: 9
D: 0
Lost: 5+1
+44.84
Thinking 2 overs would have got swept? Just estimating off my head I think...
Texas mariners.... over if 3 games, I'd assume you would call it an over swries?
Mariners would game 4 to not be swept... poo I figured. Vegas dave went mariners +1.5 could have been people's whole bank roll...
I don't think I'd back the mets again this year. I think them to lose and under are very good beta though
Well. It was the allmighty Marlins-pitching who already at exactly one game prior with 0 opp-Runs.. but yeah, Mets sucked.
They were a bad Team against a much worse one. I stated above that I don't like this situations, so yeah, won't probably happen again. But Marlins were much worse in my ratings.
[Quote]Totals for Saturday:
Over: STL @TEX (B), COL @PHI (B), KC @LAA (B)
Under: OAK @DET (C?), NYM @MIA (B)[/quote]
[Quote]Totals for Sunday:
Over: STL @TEX (C), COL @PHI (C), KC @LAA (C?)[/quote]
With average odds of -125 (lets assume some juice) would -15.7 Units approx. So, bad Weekend and I know why I don't like totals ..
Starting today:
Astros v White Sox
Braves @Giants
Cubs v Phillies
Diamondbacks @Padres
Nationals @Mets
Red Sox @Blue Jays
Twins @Angels
Yankees @Orioles
Total live-test:
Over: MIN @LAA, SEA @TEX
Under: BOS @TOR, OAK @CLE
I will be buying half a run at even lines. In the old system NYY @BAL and CWS @HOU would be overs too,
Thanks!
And yeah.. I'd like larger lines too, but unfortunately I cannot change them :)
Astros v White Sox (A): Peacock - Burr: 2.31 to win 1.00
Braves @Giants (A): Soroka - Suarez: 1.35 to win 1.00
Cubs v Phillies (A): Darvish - Arrieta: 1.14 to win 1.00
Diamondbacks @Padres (A): Weaver - Paddack: 0.75 to win 1.00
Nationals @Mets (A): Corbin - Font: 1.58 to win 1.00
Red Sox @Blue Jays (A): Price - Jackson: 2.10 to win 1.00
Twins @Angels (A): Odorizzi - Cole: 0.88 to win 1.00
Yankees @Orioles (A): Happ - Cashner: 1.75 to win 1.00
Totals - PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THIS IS A LIVE TEST AND NO REAL MONEY IS WAGERED
Over:
Mariners @Rangers (A): Leake - Minor: Over 10.5: 1.22 to win 1.00
Twins @Angels (A): Odorizzi - Cole: Over 8.5: 1.33 to win 1.00
Under:
Red Sox @Blue Jays (A): Price - Jackson: Under 8.5: 0.87 to win 1.00
Athletics @Indians (A): Anderson - Carrasco: Under 8.5: 1.25 to win 1.00
Works quite okay if you pick your places in NHL and MLB. Yet, it can be a killer for the mindset. Losing three in a row with a fav is annoying. Seeing a dog play 0-7 in seven games is a killer. Even if you stop the sweep at 3, I always ask myself what the heck I saw in that team ^^
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
