Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
0
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thasian:
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Thanks for the feedback yanks and BOL at your climb ;)
As written above, I was very succesful with my series picking-approach in the past. And am not willing o change the system just because of two early losses.. some losses WILL appear, just hoped they would pop up significantly later..
0
Quote Originally Posted by yanks21x:
Quote Originally Posted by Thasian:
Really unhappy with this weekend. Looks to be a ery bad start. Yet - should work out long-time but I hate this. Oakland again back, Rays just lost their first series of the year. In a sweep...
I hear ya... I got burnt last week by dodgers and brewers... I suggest, less series... and really put thought into it, possibly taking 4 game series and home team but not a mass favorite... just my opinion... also even trying over unders... but as I said I lost 2 sweeps already so I am climbing out of a hole
Thanks for the feedback yanks and BOL at your climb ;)
As written above, I was very succesful with my series picking-approach in the past. And am not willing o change the system just because of two early losses.. some losses WILL appear, just hoped they would pop up significantly later..
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
0
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
I add one unit "to win" per Game. Rewarding me for the extra work, so to say, and aiming for 1 unit per game.
Quick example, all bets at 2.0 / +100 :
A-Game: Risk 1.00 to win 1.00 (my one unit, I want to have)
B-Game: Risk 3.00 to win 3.00 (1 unit loss recovery, 1 unit "to win" from the A-Game, 1 extra unit since its B-Game)
C-Game: Risk 7.00 to win 7.00; 1+3=4 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C [third stage, so i want 3 units]
D-Game: Risk 15.00 to win 15.00; 1+3+7=11 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C,D [fourth stage, so i want 4 units]
0
Quote Originally Posted by yanks21x:
So I realized, if you bet 1.1 to win 1... game 2 bet, isn't it to win 1 + 1.1? You seem to be adding the bet plus win amount potential plus anot her unit?
I add one unit "to win" per Game. Rewarding me for the extra work, so to say, and aiming for 1 unit per game.
Quick example, all bets at 2.0 / +100 :
A-Game: Risk 1.00 to win 1.00 (my one unit, I want to have)
B-Game: Risk 3.00 to win 3.00 (1 unit loss recovery, 1 unit "to win" from the A-Game, 1 extra unit since its B-Game)
C-Game: Risk 7.00 to win 7.00; 1+3=4 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C [third stage, so i want 3 units]
D-Game: Risk 15.00 to win 15.00; 1+3+7=11 units loss recovery, 1 unit each for A,B,C,D [fourth stage, so i want 4 units]