Posted:
#51
Whatever happpened to this thread?
0
Mlb chase underdog system
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by darkstar77:
Whatever happpened to this thread?
Whatever happpened to this thread?
Personally.. I have taken the info and created a 'one play each new set of series' system with it (max 2 plays).
Still early in the season so unsure how it will pan out, so far so good… no juice and picking winners is quite enjoyable.
Added a few other simple little stats to look at to help with the deciding to play.
The key is to pick a dog a that will avoid the sweep… ideally like any system you wanna win on the A game as well.
Highly recommend the info in post 1..
0
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by rivermonsterz:
Any update on your progress goodsy?
Any update on your progress goodsy?
All in all it's going really well and it's the only type of MLB betting I will be/am doing…
Though I did stuff up during the middle of the season which cost me..I see it has all part of the learning process but I can honestly say this is the way to go.. just pick 1 or 2 dogs per new set of plays. If you play too many you will land in the crap.
Just put together some basic batting and pitching criteria.. look at the scheduled starters.. keep an eye on injuries. Be careful with your money management and you should be sweet.
As for MM.. I recommend not going on aggressive labby now. Martingale works great… though have a think about a recovery process too as you will need it. Don't set your stating unit amount too high otherwise you will burn yourself.
Whatever happens.. don;t get overconfident.. while it;s easy.. it;s also difficult. You think one series will be easy and you end up getting swept. Just learn from the losses.
There needs to be thought and reasoning behind the selections. Don't just pick big dogs otherwise it will eff up.
Have learnt much this season and am really excited about next season already.
0
Posted:
#55
Seems pretty straight forward..Tho' I see no reason to have such large bets..Taking a $7,000 bankroll and betting $1,000 on game 1 seems pretty crazy.
Take $7,000 and break it up into 20 $350 units maybe. You could even afford to run a couple chases at a time and still not go broke if something catastrophic happens.
0
Posted:
#57
Quote Originally Posted by Wildbill2545:
i like the look of this may give it a shot next season
i like the look of this may give it a shot next season
Absolutely mate.. it is good a method. Though be careful with your selections.. incorporate some, even basic, handicapping and you should be sweet.
Just keep in mind, the more plays you make per round, the more chance you have of being swept.
0
Posted:
#58
Quote Originally Posted by Goodsy:
Absolutely mate.. it is good a method. Though be careful with your selections.. incorporate some, even basic, handicapping and you should be sweet.
Just keep in mind, the more plays you make per round, the more chance you have of being swept.
This is my first ever covers post. I see how this system could work, but would like some help getting started with it in the 2016 MLB season. Did you try it again in 2015 season with decent results?
0
Posted:
#60
This system seems to be quite logical and makes sense, even in it's original form using the given parameters. It could be worth a shot!
Coolspot you originally posted plays then stopped (TOR A & TB A, TOR A & TB B). I looked back at the results and I think TOR B was a winner and TB B was postponed. When TB played the makeup game they won!
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by jmt41288:
I like this idea. Let's keep some communication going and go for it!
I like this idea. Let's keep some communication going and go for it!
I really like this system as well as it actually makes sense and you can actually look back to check how it did (if you wanted to). I wonder when the best time to start it would be though? Right now this early in the season you only have head-to-head stats to go on. Maybe when 10 games have been played we could look seriously into starting.
0
Posted:
#73
Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Sask:
I really like this system as well as it actually makes sense and you can actually look back to check how it did (if you wanted to). I wonder when the best time to start it would be though? Right now this early in the season you only have head-to-head stats to go on. Maybe when 10 games have been played we could look seriously into starting.
Well I would like to be a part of the ride.
0
Posted:
#74
I also like that it could only be a 3-4 game chase as opposed to a 7-8 game chase where you lose your entire bankroll!
Hopefully, as the original author stated, picking the right away teams using the given parameters will leave you with a really large percentage of away teams winning 1/3 or 1/4 games and an extremely small probability of getting swept!
0
Hot Forum Topics
