MLB Chase Systems

6.29.10

R/L BLITZ (35-0)

6/29 STL R/L  Game 3

5 GAME CHASE (147-2)

6/29 BAL (OAK to lose on Road) Game 1
6/29 CUBS (PIT to lose on Road) Game 1
6/29 SF (LAD to lose on Road)   Game 2

see you at the top!

6.29.10 results!

R/L BLITZ (35-0)

6/29 STL R/L  Game 3 (36-0)

5 GAME CHASE (147-2)

6/29 BAL (OAK to lose on Road) Game 1
6/29 CUBS (PIT to lose on Road) Game 1 (148-2)
6/29 SF (LAD to lose on Road)   Game 2

6.30.10

R/L BLITZ (36-0)

6/30 CUBS R/L  Game 1

5 GAME CHASE (148-2)

6/30 BAL (OAK to lose on Road) Game 2
6/30 SF (LAD to lose on Road)   Game 3
6/30 BAL  Game 1
6/30 ATL (NATS to lose on Road) Game1

See you at the top!

nice job keeping up prime, thanks

Sorry This thread is not real flashy, and it has been rather quiet, but I hope others can find confidence in the continued success.  It would be great if GB were to return.  I have questions that he may have already researched.

The inverse of this system may also be successful.??  These inverse plays are profitable so far this year, but I'm not sure how well they test in previous seasons.

I like to call these two other scenarios:
Road Warriors and Lame Ducks.

For example today you would have 3 - unofficial plays.

Road Warriors:
TEX: to win on the Road  Game 1
METS: to win on the Road  Game 4

Lame Ducks:
METS (Florida to lose at Home) Game 2

I don't want to clutter his thread with this topic, but maybe someone could back test these two scenarios.

6.30.10 results!

R/L BLITZ (36-0)

6/30 CUBS R/L  Game 1 

5 GAME CHASE (148-2)

6/30 BAL (OAK to lose on Road) Game 2 (149-2)
6/30 SF (LAD to lose on Road)   Game 3
6/30 BAL  Game 1 (150-2)
6/30 ATL (NATS to lose on Road) Game1 (151-2)

I'm disappointed to see the 5 Game Chase was stopped here. I know it sucked pretty bad last year with 8 or 9 losses, but it seemed to be doing very well this season.

Because it has so many plays, and it looked to be hitting a pretty high percentage of game 1's an 2's, I think this would be good potential running the Labourchere with.