last night I tried a spin off of your strategy here with the pucklines towards the underdog. and it actually hit. I will do some research for the season and let you know what I find out.
Thank you
John B.
0
last night I tried a spin off of your strategy here with the pucklines towards the underdog. and it actually hit. I will do some research for the season and let you know what I find out.
Thank you
John B.
Hard to believe Vancouver opened as a favorite here, but it did.
Fwd +429
12/08 Day 60 level (3) $300Key is New Jersey with:
[A] Anaheim 300/414
[B] Dallas 300/424
[C] Vancouver 300/580
0
Hard to believe Vancouver opened as a favorite here, but it did.
Fwd +429
12/08 Day 60 level (3) $300Key is New Jersey with:
[A] Anaheim 300/414
[B] Dallas 300/424
[C] Vancouver 300/580
yes on the 1.5 lines. In the case of the SJ last night, I am an Av's fan so I couldnt go against them and I took the Panthers @ +1.5 against Buff, since I was at the game and they came thru for me the other night against the Pens.
I will keep in touch with my research using 1.5 pucklines on the underdogs.
0
yes on the 1.5 lines. In the case of the SJ last night, I am an Av's fan so I couldnt go against them and I took the Panthers @ +1.5 against Buff, since I was at the game and they came thru for me the other night against the Pens.
I will keep in touch with my research using 1.5 pucklines on the underdogs.
Not much profit after 59 days tracking this, but there may be something similar that works better.
Have you noticed that the parlay lines are a little steeper than the straight money lines?
0
Not much profit after 59 days tracking this, but there may be something similar that works better.
Have you noticed that the parlay lines are a little steeper than the straight money lines?
mostly in NHL OT included they seem to add 4-6 extra at times--may just be that lines changed from when I was checking to when I log in to parlays. I could be wrong.
0
mostly in NHL OT included they seem to add 4-6 extra at times--may just be that lines changed from when I was checking to when I log in to parlays. I could be wrong.
After 60 days tracking this at level (1) = $100
(was not betting it in beginning) the results so far are:
[All based only on opening lines--Key = highest juice, A next then B & C]
Key team -- 42W / 18L = 70.00%
(A) team -- 38W / 22L = 63.33%
(B) team -- 37W / 20L = 64.91%
(C) team -- 32W / 17L = 65.31%
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team -- 24W/36L= 40.00% <$1,429>
(B) team -- 25W/32L= 43.86% +$762
(C) team -- 23W/26L= 46.94% +$1,790
----------------------------------
Total Keys --72W/94L= 43.37% +$1,123
0
After 60 days tracking this at level (1) = $100
(was not betting it in beginning) the results so far are:
[All based only on opening lines--Key = highest juice, A next then B & C]
Key team -- 42W / 18L = 70.00%
(A) team -- 38W / 22L = 63.33%
(B) team -- 37W / 20L = 64.91%
(C) team -- 32W / 17L = 65.31%
In Parlays, Key with:
(A) team -- 24W/36L= 40.00% <$1,429>
(B) team -- 25W/32L= 43.86% +$762
(C) team -- 23W/26L= 46.94% +$1,790
----------------------------------
Total Keys --72W/94L= 43.37% +$1,123
On that trip to level (5) and back to level (1) lost about $1,000. ||angry.gif' border=0>
The whole idea of sliding units is to have more $$ when key wins than when key loses---unfortunately, got little help from the A B C teams, and not even one sweep!
Still +$1,411 with the sliding units is a little better than the +743 on flat plays.
0
On that trip to level (5) and back to level (1) lost about $1,000. ||angry.gif' border=0>
The whole idea of sliding units is to have more $$ when key wins than when key loses---unfortunately, got little help from the A B C teams, and not even one sweep!
Still +$1,411 with the sliding units is a little better than the +743 on flat plays.