Posted:
#251
Your record is wrong.
Total for chase is 44-14
Telling people it 44-2 is not correct.
0
HFOUDL System 2009
Posted:
#252
Quote Originally Posted by nngov:
Your record is wrong.
Your record is wrong.
Total for chase is 44-14
Telling people it 44-2 is not correct.
No.. it is not. It is 44-2.
When you lose a 3 or 4 game series it counts as ONE loss on the Chase and you substract the 14 or 15 Units lost for the entire series, not 7 or however the hell many you have it calculated as..
Learn how to use a damn System before you start "correcting" someone in their own thread.
Get Lost Pal.. your commentary isn't needed here.
0
Posted:
#253
Quote Originally Posted by nngov:
Your record is wrong.
Your record is wrong.
Total for chase is 44-14
Telling people it 44-2 is not correct.
You sir, are an idiot.
Please come back when you learn basic math and realize that 1+1 = 2.
I apologize for the late post, was really busy today.
These stats do not include today's games.
(betting each game of series)
AL = 54-32 (62.79%) +13.42u
NL = 37-26 (58.73%) +4.88u
Total = 91-58 (61.07%) +18.30u
(Chase)
AL = 27-1 (96.43%) +16.08u
NL = 19-1 (95.00%) +5.45u
Total = 46-2 (95.83%) +21.53u
Games For June 13th, 2009
Singles
SF +100
LAA -128
Tor -138
Chase
Tor -138 (4.28u)
0
Posted:
#255
Well i hope we win some cash today cause i am bumming about the Red Wings loss last night. Im deathly afraid this is going to lead a Pitt dynasty now. Have to congratulate them on coming up huge in Detroit after what happened in game 5.
Anyway on to the system.
I have a question for today's game. I am using sportsbetting as a book and they aren't anywere close to having the Angles at -128. They have them at -200. Thats quite a difference. Was wondering what book you are using that has them at -128?
Also, just to help me follow this more on my own. Where do you get the info that helps you determine what teams were dogs yesterday. Do you just print them off of covers or a book and hang on til the next day? It probably sounds like a dumb question but it would help me follow this more closely and, in cases like yesterday, be able to place my wagers on my own in case you are busy.
0
Posted:
#256
Yeah the Angels are -210 on my book right now.. and rightly so with Saunders vs. Geer.
If you click on Scoreboard, MLB here on covers, you can go back to the previous days and it shows what the lines were for that game. You can even go back years and get lines on games, very useful.
It then shows the lines for the current days games so you can figure out who is a home fav very quickly.
The Jays are stinkin it up bigtime again.. I think I'm going to have to bail on them because I can't handle a 3rd system loss so close in succession..
BOL
If you click on Scoreboard, MLB here on covers, you can go back to the previous days and it shows what the lines were for that game. You can even go back years and get lines on games, very useful.
It then shows the lines for the current days games so you can figure out who is a home fav very quickly.
The Jays are stinkin it up bigtime again.. I think I'm going to have to bail on them because I can't handle a 3rd system loss so close in succession..
BOL
0
Posted:
#260
Quote Originally Posted by kreatture:
Tom I would double check your bet, cuz I'm sure it was Refunded. There was a pitching change and there's no way LA was -128 with Saunders vs. Geer ???
Tom I would double check your bet, cuz I'm sure it was Refunded. There was a pitching change and there's no way LA was -128 with Saunders vs. Geer ???
For the sake of tracking, I'll be listing it as -210.
I didn't actually bet that game, decided to stay away from interleague after last year haha
0
Posted:
#275
Quote Originally Posted by Tomspeople:
(betting each game of series)
AL = 59-35 (62.77%) +14.07u
NL = 39-26 (60.00%) +6.88u
Total = 98-61 (61.64%) +20.95u
(Chase)
AL = 29-2 (93.55%) +3.21u
NL = 19-1 (95.00%) +5.45u
Total = 48-3 (94.12%) +8.66u
(betting each game of series)
AL = 59-35 (62.77%) +14.07u
NL = 39-26 (60.00%) +6.88u
Total = 98-61 (61.64%) +20.95u
(Chase)
AL = 29-2 (93.55%) +3.21u
NL = 19-1 (95.00%) +5.45u
Total = 48-3 (94.12%) +8.66u
Toft - it would appear so far that yes, betting each game is more profitable.
0
Hot Forum Topics
