Baseball Heavy F

We're trying to help each other out here. I appreciate the posts otherwise I would have never come across this system. We are all humans here and mistakes happen. Eagle is doing us a favour and taking this over from Dan, this isn't his job. If you can do a better job step up and do it. Your internet bully tactics won't work here. Bah bah sheep? Grow up big boy. 

8 hours. Let me guess. Maybe is supereagle not actually an eagle but a human being with life, work and family. I also remember Chaser calling this forum the "gentlemen forum" so we can watch our language, cool down and move on. 

The reason for 8 hours was because I wasn’t on the board for that long and I bet the Twins so had no reason to even know I had made a typo. I was preoccupied and it even caused me to misspell Rockies. Anyone following this and knowing the nature of the plays would have known that the Astros run line was incorrect, I would hope, because it would be disproportionate from an odds standpoint by a long shot. I plainly had the bet amount correct and that wouldn’t match up with the Astros playing an equal level team. That’s the reason I will stand by 1-1 and not 0-2. Once again, I do apologize for the error but I’m not treating this as if a bunch of 1st graders are following and everything has to be perfectly executed for them to understand. Sports Network you really caught me off guard with how you went off on me and the situation. You really roasted me good. I have followed and read your stuff for years and have much respect. I hope you were just having a bad day.

Not a bad day, but a boring one; came across your 8 hour delay post, picked up a couple of S&S trolls with less than a 100 post's between them and rolled with a couple of very entertaining responses 'they took the bait..a ball buster, nothing personal, you and I are good;  and under any circumstances will I ever enter a thread using 'ball busting humorous tactics in your direction.

Dodgers Winner Indians Loser Overall Record 49-39 Playing $20/play: Starting Bankroll $2000 Current Bankroll $2093.00 Friday Plays: Risking $20 to win $20 on Braves RL Risking $30.40 to win $20 on Rockies RL Labby: Starting Bankroll $2000 Current Bankroll $2101.31 10-10-10-10-60-60-60-64-74-96 Friday Plays: Risking $161.12 to win $106 on Rockies RL Risking $106 to win $106 on Braves RL

Sorry to pop-up once again but I'm a bit concerned about this labby MM. Last night, you had to engage half the bankroll to bet this "$94-to-win" on each game. 94*8= 752, though your entire line only shows $342 losses (and $372 in total)....so your MM kinda creates "virtual losses". 

Of course, if you win all 8 bets, it's pretty cool because you can scratch your entire line more than twice! but what's the point of risking and trying to win more than twice of the actual line total ? it looks very risky to me (betting on labby being already too risky for most bettors...)

I'm working on a way to manage labby lines and it's already difficult to deal with "real losses" so I'd just wish to have your feelings about that.

Thanks agin for keeping this thread alive and GL 

Your points are valid. With the labby and it’s infinite ways to be run it comes down to risk tolerance for the individual. I allowed myself $2K that I was willing to lose doing this. To go winless last night would have killed it. I wouldn’t have lost 2K, but I wouldn’t have been able to recover the losses either so I would have had to stop. This method fits my level of aggression and is exactly how I play it. I am willing to go all the way up to risking 7.5% of my bankroll/play ($150). Of course sometimes you may catch odds that spill over $150 a little and I would play through based on the average risk amount. When the bets exceed that amount I would pull a total reset and start fresh from there regardless of where the Bankroll sits. Here again it all comes down to risk tolerance and each persons individual goal of what they want to accomplish. I had the idea that I wanted to double my bankroll to $4K when I took this over. The only way that would be possible would be by playing more aggressively. After taking Dan’s advice early on I pulled back the aggression quite a bit and thankfully. It’s really good that you asked this because I hadn’t really considered that many people following this would not play by the rule laid out at the beginning of the base bet being 1% of the bankroll. With any method of progression it HAS to be this way or there will be certain demise. I really prefer a half or even a quarter percent for the base play honestly. Anyone who has followed to this point should be ahead and not hurt. Please, moving forward, DO NOT play this if you aren’t playing based around 1% of your bankroll or less. Progressives are just too risky because bad runs will happen. I hope this helps.

Early play on Nats RL

Guys I just noticed I typoed again. We are supposed to be RL not ML. I hope this was realized in time for Sports Network!

Deservedly so..

Thursday Plays:

I think I will preserve the remainder of my $2K and pull the plug here. My aggressive Labby couldn’t get the job done. I will continue to post the $20 plays and see how they play out.