All Forums | Systems & Strategies

4 GAME CHASE SYSTEM 51-1 SO FAR THIS YEAR

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 29841
Posts: 364
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 3164
Posted: #76
WOWWWWWWWW!!!! Almost flipped over the coffee table celebrating the Morales single that gave the Angels the win! Starting to stress cuz I don't have the proper bankroll for a chase-system like this so I may have to use strict filters (e.g. only chase home teams above .500 and fade teams below .500)...either that, or just follow the thread and bet the game 3 or 4 of a chase...

Thanks again Tony for updating the thread on a regular !
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #77

Quote Originally Posted by tha_riddla:

WOWWWWWWWW!!!! Almost flipped over the coffee table celebrating the Morales single that gave the Angels the win! Starting to stress cuz I don't have the proper bankroll for a chase-system like this so I may have to use strict filters (e.g. only chase home teams above .500 and fade teams below .500)...either that, or just follow the thread and bet the game 3 or 4 of a chase...

Thanks again Tony for updating the thread on a regular !


 

SURE THING! HOPE IT WORKS OUT WELL FOR EVERYONE!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 443
Posted: #78
I agree with Riddla - because I was staring down the barrell of a heavy, heavy wager sourced from a light bankroll.  Riddla, if you can heavy an effective way of working that filter, be it Excel or Access, let me know, b/c whatever it is, I can see how it would be labor intensive.
 
But to see that Angels score on Sportscenter after seeing the 8-2 Mariners lead in the afternoon -- that got me out of a bigtime jam
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 73
Posted: #79
Did i miss something here? It almost sounded like TONYALLDAY3 was signing off from this thread.
I was really looking forward to following this and i really hope that you continue to post here TONY since i have been looking for a chase system in baseball like the NHL chase i have been doing the whole winter.

Very grateful for all your help TONY.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 73
Posted: #80
Sorry, my mistake. I finally found mondays games on the third page of the thread . Was updating the fourth page over and over but couldn´t find the plays so i got a little worried there for a minute.
Sorry TONY, keep up the good work.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #81
Cards are a game 2
 
 anything else for today guys ?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 82
Posted: #82
with the >.500 and >.500 filter:

2000.    68,88u  199-3   98,51%  -58,49u
2001.    65,47u   190-5  97,44%  -34,96u
2002.  119,25u   218-6  97,32%  -22,76u
2003.    28,76u   213-5  97,71%  -80,15u
2004.   -67,15u   196-7  96,55%  -90,50u
2005.    51,46u   191-8  95,98%  -26,58u
2006.  138,54u   206-4  98,10%  -27,63u
2007.     9,30u   197-8  96,10%  -30,31u
2008.   99,17u   203-3  98,54%  -47,19u


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 443
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by stickman80733:

Cards are a game 2
 
 anything else for today guys ?

Tony generally checks in sometime in the morning to verify. But I remember him saying he gets pretty busy with his job. So far I only know what you know -- Cards, game 2.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #84
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR MONDAY

GAME ONE:
CWS (OAK to lose) 1unit chase
St.Louis 1unit chase


SYSTEM RECORD 15-0
 
Sorry guys really busy will have tonights plays released as soon as I get a chance

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 443
Posted: #85
my book voided my CWS bet on Monday, b/c of the pitching change. 
 
Did this happen to anyone else?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 3164
Posted: #86
hrabri_pero - Thanks for posting those figures!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #87
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR TUESDAY

GAME ONE:
TOR 1unit chase
TB 1unit chase
TB (KC to lose) 1unit chase
SD 1unit chase

GAME TWO:
TIGERS 1unit chase
ST.LOUIS 1unit chase

GAME THREE:
NYY (TEX to lose) 1unit chase

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 73
Posted: #88
Ok, im stupid. Why do you bet on both TB to win AND fading KC? Is it two different chases or is it a misprint?
Should i make two bets on TB then?
Confused.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #89
Quote Originally Posted by pete22:

Ok, im stupid. Why do you bet on both TB to win AND fading KC? Is it two different chases or is it a misprint?
Should i make two bets on TB then?
Confused.

 

 i think the system, fit both Tampa & fading KC, thats how he listed, not sure if he played it for 2 units because of this, i just stuck w 1 & considered it a real strong play

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 538
Posted: #90
Just a question, I'm confused about units.  Lets say my unit is $100 and a team is -200 and I bet $200 to win $100 and lose  then the next game that team is -200 again, I bet $400 to win $200 and lose again.  Wouldn't I be down 6 units after 2 games instead of 3 then?  I guess what I'm asking is, do you bet enough to win $100 or bet $100 and win whatever it pays?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 73
Posted: #91
I took a shower and figured it out. It´s one chase where we are chasing for a win for tampa. And then another where we are chasing KC to lose.
Maybe not so stupid after all
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 4
Posted: #92
Can someone explain why NYY is a play with this system?
I am not seeing where it fits the criteria.
Show me, please..
Roger
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #93
I could of said 2units on TB but I wanted to show that both teams fit the system. NYY is a play because Tex won 3 straight road games after a losing streak.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #94
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #95
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR TUESDAY

GAME ONE:
TOR 1unit chase
TB 1unit chase
TB (KC to lose) 1unit chase
SD 1unit chase

GAME TWO:
TIGERS 1unit chase
ST.LOUIS 1unit chase

GAME THREE:
NYY (TEX to lose) 1unit chase
 
SYSTEM RECORD 20-0  calling sd a loss if they come back great!
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1367
Posted: #96
Det tomorrow...Wanna be careful...I recommend taking it at +1.5(-125)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1864
Posted: #97
great job Tony
 
 good point by allornothing
 
 Padres & Tigers have potential to be dangerous here playing Red Sox & Phillies,  2 elite teams,  any filters or ya just let it ride ?
 
 i might just go lighter due to the situation
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #98
Im letting it ride. I dont wanna change it up now.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 182
Posted: #99
SYSTEM PLAYS FOR WED
 
GAME 2:
SD 1unit chase
 
GAME 3:
DET 1unit chase
 
SYSTEM RECORD 20-0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 39
Posted: #100
Hi Tony, i am new to this site and been reading your thread and find it quite interesting and wanting to throw some action on your bets and see how well it goes.

Question that pops in my mind? Do you not analyze whatsoever the likilihood or chance of your team your supposed to bet on (according to the chase idea and who qualifies) how they match up with whom they are playing?

meaning, detroit tomorrow who your chasing has an absolutely terrible pitcher tomorrow and the pitcher for boston is outstanding thus why the juice is so high for boston to win..

Do you not consider this information or do you simply bet almost unemotional without analyzing the game at hand "simply because it qualifies"

? look forward to your reply.
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.