My selection method depends on finding patterns within a group of 28 numbers. I went into the pattern that selected Leeds to win or draw and added some additional requirements to meet in order to be an investment recommendation. Hope this adjustment makes that pattern more reliable. I personally am now 1 win and 1 loss with that pattern and the archives winning percentage has fallen from 9 and 2 (81.81%) to now 9 and 3 (75.00% which is the requirement for a Two * selection which I stopped posting a few weeks ago.) but in archives to personally make a wager on one of these selections or post it here on Covers the archives for a Four * Selection must be 80.00% or higher and a Five * Selection must be 88.88% or higher. The requirements for a Three * Selection are not based on winning percentage but rather on return on investment. The ROI must be at about 1.00 unit profit per unit wagered or higher.
Thank you, Leonard
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
My selection method depends on finding patterns within a group of 28 numbers. I went into the pattern that selected Leeds to win or draw and added some additional requirements to meet in order to be an investment recommendation. Hope this adjustment makes that pattern more reliable. I personally am now 1 win and 1 loss with that pattern and the archives winning percentage has fallen from 9 and 2 (81.81%) to now 9 and 3 (75.00% which is the requirement for a Two * selection which I stopped posting a few weeks ago.) but in archives to personally make a wager on one of these selections or post it here on Covers the archives for a Four * Selection must be 80.00% or higher and a Five * Selection must be 88.88% or higher. The requirements for a Three * Selection are not based on winning percentage but rather on return on investment. The ROI must be at about 1.00 unit profit per unit wagered or higher.
Hot Forum Topics
