Posted:
#26
MINNESOTA
Washington at Minnesota (11/07/2013)
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by holtnt:
The ML was at -480 - YEAH IT WAS!!!
80% of all the side money was riding on the pack - Luckily. I was one of the "20 Percenters"
Wise Men in Vegas made enough money on that deal to build another wing onto Vegas - But only 2.5 bathrooms, not 3, thanks to me!
I’m NOT telling on anybody… I’m just saying - Me too!!!!
Posted:
#30
I want to take MIN +2.5 because the public is all over WAS and we know what that means...its just so hard to back Ponder...I have taken the dog and gone against the public in the last 4 MON/THURS night games and it hasnt worked well, it is 1-3 with the only cover being the Rams +16 at home against Seattle but aside from that I took the Vikings +4.5 at home against the Giants and they got blown out, I took the Redskins +5.5 on the road at DAL and they got blown out, and Tampa +6.5 at home against CAR and they got blown out...shitty QB's are so hard to bet on yet I've had no porblem doing it and losing the past four weeks, so why not try again?
MIN +2.5
MIN +2.5
Posted:
#31
Games are not fixed mhmmm mhmmm
Canseco is a liar there is no steroid abuse! He's just a loser and wants attention to sell his stupid book!.....WRONG
Canseco is a liar there is no steroid abuse! He's just a loser and wants attention to sell his stupid book!.....WRONG
Tim Donaghy is a liar NBA not fixed, no favoritism. WRONG
MLB is not fixed it can never happen. uh WHITE SOX anyone? WRONG
Another thing how in the world do the line makers get it almost perfect every single time? Are they Nostradamus? Why would they just not make a killing in the stock market?
Please young men...if you bet, know what you are against. All I'm saying.
Please young men...if you bet, know what you are against. All I'm saying.
Posted:
#33
Skins are in a must win game. They have a pretty nice schedule the rest of the year minus SF and KC. A win here puts them right back Iinto position to do what they did last year in the 2nd half. Skins D has had to work hard cause RG3 played horrible early on, he looks much better now and Morris is running great which will help tge D out. Fixed or not I could never back Minnesota against anyone, especially a team fighting for a playoff spot in the weak east.
27-20 Skins
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by tulanebill:
I can't recall seeing this much talk about "fixing" games as we are hearing this year. Is there any truth to the rumblings, or do we just have more sore losers posting this season?
The fact is that the league is tightening up so much, it comes down to one play. As opposed to 20 years ago when there were always a few stacked teams, its now the opposite.........a slew of flawed/average teams, with the few bottom dwellers..... It's not a better league as everyone thinks..
I can't recall seeing this much talk about "fixing" games as we are hearing this year. Is there any truth to the rumblings, or do we just have more sore losers posting this season?
Posted:
#35
Here in MN we are tired of watching a talented team on paper $hit the bed week after week. Crucial downs, you'll see AP on the sidelines. Frasier doesn't even make defenses account for AP in those situations. Ponder is afraid of his shadow and clams up in the pocket. Freeman can't read a defense or throw remotely accurately. Castle gets out there and wonders why the coaching staff thinks he's capable of holding anything more than a clipboard in his hands.
Redskins are playing for something cuz the NFC East is horrible and they still have a chance. The Vikes have their eyes on next year and a decent draft pick.
I'll take Shannahan and RGIII over Ponder and Fraiser any day. I'm not forgetting about the most explosive running back in the game but he is hindered by a hamstring that may not be getting as much national attention. AP was not able to hit that top gear on a few of his big runs last week in Dallas. He still has above average speed, but compared to previous seasons, the hamstring is keeping him from really unleashing.
Skins win & Over. 28-24
That is unless Blair Walsh decides to take the under again and misses a chip shot & a PAT.
Posted:
#37
Usually, I will just post an analysis of the game.... as I will do later.
But for now, I want to speak to the people that clearly never make the right pick and simply complain when they lose...
THE GAMES IN THE NFL AND NCAAF ARE NOT FIXED. PLEASE STOP YOUR IGNORANCE. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING GOOD TO ADD, BY ALL MEANS, PLEASE DO SO.
There are a lot of people here that add great insight to the games they actually wager on, those people know who they are....
But if you're one of the people claiming "the game was fixed" or "this team wins because the other just sucks".... Please SHUT UP, no one cares about your bad betting decisions, conspiracy theories, or useless insight.
THANK YOU, RANT COMPLETE.
Posted:
#38
Every time I read a thread on this site everyone is always saying "The public is on the Skins/ (insert team) and I'm going against the public on this one" but that is being said on 90% of the posts so the "public" is on the Vikings tonight. The line on my site has moved 1.5 against the Vikings since Tuesday from +2.5 down to +1... 
(pssst... public money is on the Vikings tonight)
This line should be over a field goal, there just begging you to take the hapless Vikings with this BS line. Rollin' Skins with a better QB and good run game... Over is likely but no play
Good Luck Amigos!
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by Wailers15:
Hmmmmm WSH beat a Chargers team that is much better than the Vikes especially on the D side of the ball, but that was at home.
Hmmmmm WSH beat a Chargers team that is much better than the Vikes especially on the D side of the ball, but that was at home.
Orakpo & Co....
Skins at least by 3. I just can't see the Vikes doing much. Dallas is crap too so that game didn't measure anything except that the Vikes are poop.
Skins are not completely that crappy of a team.
If Dallas is cap and Dallas has beaten both of these teams what does that make these teams. Especially the redskins.. I like vikes here. Rg3 will try to make a game winning move and end up giving the game away. He is the reason they suck.. Ap exposes the same D line that Dallas got off on. Let's go purple people eaters!!!
Over
Posted:
#45
Quote Originally Posted by GordoPockets:
Usually, I will just post an analysis of the game.... as I will do later.
Usually, I will just post an analysis of the game.... as I will do later.
But for now, I want to speak to the people that clearly never make the right pick and simply complain when they lose...
THE GAMES IN THE NFL AND NCAAF ARE NOT FIXED. PLEASE STOP YOUR IGNORANCE. IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING GOOD TO ADD, BY ALL MEANS, PLEASE DO SO.
There are a lot of people here that add great insight to the games they actually wager on, those people know who they are....
But if you're one of the people claiming "the game was fixed" or "this team wins because the other just sucks".... Please SHUT UP, no one cares about your bad betting decisions, conspiracy theories, or useless insight.
THANK YOU, RANT COMPLETE.
Okay Gordo, I've given you several cases of the NFL bein shady/ fixed and if you're truly that naive then keep waiting on Santa on Christmas Day to bring you presents. This guy is one of the purists I was talking about. By the way it is now safe to take Washington for all the redskin backers as all the money is starting to come down. Good luck to all!!!!
Posted:
#47
No way I'm backing a shitty minn team. TE gone now so who the fk ponder gonna throw too? Samantha? eyyyyy!!! The whole whose the public on, what Vegas wants...blah blah gives me a headache. Rosie Perez said it best sumtime choo win and sometime yoo loos. When you win act like you been there and when you lose...blame the dog. Hate Hate. Wash making a run for division. Wash and ov mediums
If you’re not large, you’re small - the DOC
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by Bhatchett12:
Let me repeat...when it comes to the National Fixed League don't be a purist be a realist!!! It's a billion dollar business and your telling me never have they fixed a game. Let's get serious. I've given you a couple. How about Peyton Manning sliding down instead of going in with absolutely no one around him. Remember that??!!! Let's get serious!! I'm not saying every game is fixed but there has definitely been its share of them. Don't be naive. By the way I hate to be the one to tell you but there's not a Santa!! One last thing this is the sport/league known thru the years and in vegas for fixing games. Minnesota will probably win this game. Just like when the entire post was on Seattle against the Rams. I couldn't wait to take the Rams and walk my happy behind up to the counter to pick up my $$$$. Good luck guys!!
Let me repeat...when it comes to the National Fixed League don't be a purist be a realist!!! It's a billion dollar business and your telling me never have they fixed a game. Let's get serious. I've given you a couple. How about Peyton Manning sliding down instead of going in with absolutely no one around him. Remember that??!!! Let's get serious!! I'm not saying every game is fixed but there has definitely been its share of them. Don't be naive. By the way I hate to be the one to tell you but there's not a Santa!! One last thing this is the sport/league known thru the years and in vegas for fixing games. Minnesota will probably win this game. Just like when the entire post was on Seattle against the Rams. I couldn't wait to take the Rams and walk my happy behind up to the counter to pick up my $$$$. Good luck guys!!
For anyone who hasn't seem much of the Rams this year, I can understand thinking that the Sea/St. Louis line was a lock in favor of the Seahawks.
You can go back to the game thread and view my post about it. I bet big on the Rams that night. And not because the whole world was on Seattle. I bet big on the Rams because despite all their deficiencies, they have a pretty solid defensive front. Robert Quinn, Brockers, Chris Long, etc. and Seattle's offensive line is horrible. Seattle is a great team and has a great quarterback, but I knew the Rams would be able to pressure Wilson. Despite Seattle being a much better team, St. Louis is a bad matchup for Seattle. Locally, I was able to get the line at +14 and felt very strongly that Seattle would have a tough time scoring and I figured all the Rams would do would be kick field goals with Greg the Leg. For that reason I bet the under also.
I get a ton of games wrong and bet on a lot of teams that I don't get to watch or know much about. My only point is, I don't believe there was a fix in that game. I just think people looked at it and said man, Seattle is awesome and St. Louis is garbage.
I would never bet on a road two touchdown favorite. This isn't college football. I took the Jaguars +28 when they played Denver. A lot has to go right for the much better team to cover in those situations and the better team has to be motivated to want to crush the opposition as opposed to just coasting to the inevitable easy victory.
Hot Forum Topics
