Are we supposed to believe a Belichek team lost this many balls in the first quarter on accident? They are laying down in order to not have to face seattle in the playoffs. They are hoping that san fran will take them out for them. I was afraid of this but talked myself into a small bet on new england to my regret.
San Francisco at New England (12/16/2012)
Posted:
#76
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:
Are we supposed to believe a Belichek team lost this many balls in the first quarter on accident? They are laying down in order to not have to face seattle in the playoffs. They are hoping that san fran will take them out for them. I was afraid of this but talked myself into a small bet on new england to my regret.
Are we supposed to believe a Belichek team lost this many balls in the first quarter on accident? They are laying down in order to not have to face seattle in the playoffs. They are hoping that san fran will take them out for them. I was afraid of this but talked myself into a small bet on new england to my regret.
Dude Seattle is in the NFC 
Quote Originally Posted by mellowman7883:
Are we supposed to believe a Belichek team lost this many balls in the first quarter on accident? They are laying down in order to not have to face seattle in the playoffs. They are hoping that san fran will take them out for them. I was afraid of this but talked myself into a small bet on new england to my regret.
Are we supposed to believe a Belichek team lost this many balls in the first quarter on accident? They are laying down in order to not have to face seattle in the playoffs. They are hoping that san fran will take them out for them. I was afraid of this but talked myself into a small bet on new england to my regret.
Dude Seattle is in the NFC 
Posted:
#77
I think i need to stick to the NBA. Just an atrocious day. THe good news is the PATs are only down 14.. Should be down 28 with that first half performance
I think i need to stick to the NBA. Just an atrocious day. THe good news is the PATs are only down 14.. Should be down 28 with that first half performance
Posted:
#78
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
I've gone 10-5 on my posted picks so far this week. If you're nice to me EasyPics- I let you suck up to me alittle.![]()
Quote Originally Posted by easypics:
I've gone 10-5 on my posted picks so far this week. If you're nice to me EasyPics- I let you suck up to me alittle.![]()
Posted:
#85
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:
I've gone 10-5 on my posted picks so far this week. If you're nice to me EasyPics- I let you suck up to me alittle.![]()
He's such a BS liar !![]()
![]()
Quote Originally Posted by vue21849:
I've gone 10-5 on my posted picks so far this week. If you're nice to me EasyPics- I let you suck up to me alittle.![]()
He's such a BS liar !![]()
![]()
Posted:
#86
This game was exciting. IF SF can make it to the Superbowl and meets up again with the Pats, I'm gonna be ALL OVER the Pats for sure. You don't get to beat the Pats twice in one year. Then again that's IF SF can even make it past the playoffs which I'm thinking they will lose yet once again in a HUGE disappointment. Memories of last year looming around will leave butterflies in their stomachs.

I went 4-1 on my regular plays and this was a small play that lost and that was clearly stated as a small play. Hopefully anyone following wasn't riding LARGE on this game because if you watched it, the Pats caught up, tied it and could've covered but it just wasn't meant to be this time around. It wasn't like the Pats never had a chance to cover in this game at any point. So I'm yet once again after 3 weeks of straight hot @ss fire runs collecting yet once again this week.
Looking forward to next week and yet another awesome run!
This game was exciting. IF SF can make it to the Superbowl and meets up again with the Pats, I'm gonna be ALL OVER the Pats for sure. You don't get to beat the Pats twice in one year. Then again that's IF SF can even make it past the playoffs which I'm thinking they will lose yet once again in a HUGE disappointment. Memories of last year looming around will leave butterflies in their stomachs.

I went 4-1 on my regular plays and this was a small play that lost and that was clearly stated as a small play. Hopefully anyone following wasn't riding LARGE on this game because if you watched it, the Pats caught up, tied it and could've covered but it just wasn't meant to be this time around. It wasn't like the Pats never had a chance to cover in this game at any point. So I'm yet once again after 3 weeks of straight hot @ss fire runs collecting yet once again this week.
Looking forward to next week and yet another awesome run!
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,175
- Monday 11/02/2026 706
- BEARS/SEATTLE live in game COMMENTS welcome 774
- NFL LOCKED IN! 112,270
- PART DEUX 161
- Florida Man - Monday Night 4,790
- Streak Survivor Winner List 21,856
- I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 6,560
- *EdgeHunter MNF Bears VS. Seahawks! 12-2 Run — Trust the Research, Let the Plays Speak!* 2,861
- Week 10 Money 1,607
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
