All Forums | Pro Football

Oakland at San Diego (11/10/2011)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 11614
Posts: 73
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 264
Posted: #51
I think San Diego is not up to par, but Oakland without McFadden?
forget about it
San Diego and under

if McFadden was not on crutches, it would be a different story !!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 93
Posted: #52

My Mid-Week 13 point teaser:

Oakland +20 over Chargers

Houston Under 87 against Tulane

GT +14 over VA Tech

Cent Mich +20 over Ohio

GL EVERYONE SHOULD BE A GREAT WEEKEND!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1253
Posted: #53
How much does this game SUCK when the OhioU / CMich thread is better....

I've seen hockey threads with more to talk about.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 615
Posted: #54
Lets keep cashing units guys..

Chargers -7

GLA
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1253
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by CappingVet:

Lets keep cashing units guys..

Chargers -7

GLA


CHEERS!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 4377
Posted: #56
S.D. -7
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 910
Posted: #57

LMAO_ I am with you, these are two crappy teams. I have been waiting for the "real rivers" to show up all season long....

BOLTALL & Gooooooo OhioU / CMich overs!!

Quote Originally Posted by drcomer:

How much does this game SUCK when the OhioU / CMich thread is better....


I've seen hockey threads with more to talk about.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1718
Posted: #58
looks like this game is right on the number. norv is a terrible head coach...take the +7
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 276
Posted: #59
sd will find a way to lose this one
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2937
Posted: #60
The Raiders lost at home against the Chiefs and Broncos
Oh yeah they suck
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 141
Posted: #61
Both on a short week.  I see the Raiders struggling to move the ball without McFadden and Palmer VERY rusty for obvious reasons.  Chargers put up some points then control the ball with Tolbert...tick tick tick.

Under 48

GL to all! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1157
Posted: #62
Well I hope to God I don't get f'ed on this wager..



Chargers -6.5 (Bought 1/2 pt. -125)  $1000 to win $800

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2010
Posts: 746
Posted: #63
Norv better not f this up for me!! My damn bookie when I went back for more on SD told me 8 points, what a fuck job.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4491
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by BreakaBookie:

Locked in 6.5 before the public drives the game close to 9 

Sd is a route i expect them to hit he pedal as they always do this time of the year

They were very impressive vs the packers and if tebow can play like elway vs oakland at home then its scary to see what rivers will do to this defense on the road.....

CArson palmer and no mcfadden on the road looks too appealing to pass up


Chargers -6.5

GL to all!!!

Really?!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 149
Posted: #65
Oakland 2nd H,LARGE!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1253
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by drcomer:


What about the fact that this is an Oakland team is quickly losing itself this season. 

The coach is not making good NFL coaching decisions

The QB is still making bad decisions on the field

The defense can't stop Tebow, KC, or anybody

The only guy that gives them a chance is not going to play

And you don't know who the coach is going to decide not to give playing time to this week

Let me be the first to say this...

I WAS WRONG!!!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1253
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by drcomer:


Raiders have a rookie coach, new/old/rusty QB, 1 WR that can catch but is very slow and old and new to the team, all other WRs are fast but got no hands, their best player is not going to be a factor tonight, and a defense that made Tim Tebow look like John Elway....

I can go on but I'm getting tired.

The only chance the Raiders have is if Rivers opens the back door for them.

OK, OK....

I WAS WRONG!!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1157
Posted: #68
So like the Baltimore/Jax game...the fix is in.  Only this one is much more believable 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1011
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by dddevin69:

Both of these teams SUCK ASS.          LMAO @ oak for losing to denver and god's disciple Tim Tebow

 

This is an iffy game at best.  medium play.....Oakland +6.5    Sd is clearly the better team and will win, but Sd may find a way to keep oakland in the game.

 

 

 

shoulda listened to DAT DURTY DEVIN....in the 69  wit yo Baby's mama.......   Hey where is that MORON 702CRAPPER?!?!?!?!   ur supposed to be such a Freakin Oakland raiders fan.   I called them to lost to KC and I WAS RIGHT.  and now I'm calling their big upset of SD.    WTF are u kid?!!?!?!?!   ur were right 702....UNDERDOG LOGIC CUMIN THROUGH!!!!!!!!!!!

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 910
Posted: #70
DDD gump soooooooooooooooooooooo sad, like I said you only stay around when you win, which is almost never.......really sooooo pathetic...  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1827
Posted: #71

Wow, what a pathetic game for the Chargers - F*** Rivers, he's done........ How much do they miss Darren Sproles or even L.T. right now. Way to "lose it in the lights" there Jackson...........

Although, they're in such a weak ass division, they might still wind up winning it - but they won't get any more of my $$$$ - - unless of course they start winning

Congrats Raidahhhhhhhhs & Under

 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1011
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by BombaBookie:

DDD gump soooooooooooooooooooooo sad, like I said you only stay around when you win, which is almost never.......really sooooo pathetic...  

 

 

Dude....Get off my NUTS!!!!!!!!!!         ur a freakin MORON.  Unlike urself at least I have the GUMPTION/ backbone to call a side. U don't ever call a side.  U just sit back and rag on people who call games like myself.  I don't see anywhere where u predicted team a would be team b or the O/U point spread.   ur an ARSEHOLE in my book.     I know ur pathetic ass is just waiting to read this.  I thought we called a truce...but I guess not. 

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 6622
Posted: #73
Are you serious? Did this game really go under, holy jesus in hell....
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.